# PEMBINA COCHIN LLC — Notice of Probable Violation

- **operation:** document
- **citation:** CPF 320205004
- **title:** PEMBINA COCHIN LLC — Notice of Probable Violation
- **source type:** enforcement
- **agency:** Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
- **status:** historical
- **official:** true
- **published on:** 2020-03-19
- **effective on:** Not available
- **summary:** CLOSED notice of probable violation citing 195.307(c), 195.505(b).
- **machine formats:** - **json:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-enforcement-320205004.json
- **markdown:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-enforcement-320205004.md
- **app url:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-enforcement-320205004
- **source url:** https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-data/case/320205004
**body:**

Notice of Probable Violation involving PEMBINA COCHIN LLC. PHMSA's enforcement data identifies the cited regulations as 195.307(c),  195.505(b). The case was opened on 2020-03-19 and is reported as closed as of 2024-12-16. Proposed civil penalty: $187,200. Assessed civil penalty: $172,800. Open the official case record for notices, responses, orders, and the latest status.

Official case documents:

320205004_Closure Letter_12162024_(16-153531S).pdf: https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-documents/320205004/320205004_Closure%20Letter_12162024_(16-153531S).pdf

320205004_Closure Letter_12162024_(16-153531S)_text.pdf: https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-documents/320205004/320205004_Closure%20Letter_12162024_(16-153531S)_text.pdf

320205004_Consent Agreement and Order_03182021.pdf: https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-documents/320205004/320205004_Consent%20Agreement%20and%20Order_03182021.pdf

320205004_Consent Agreement and Order_03182021_text.pdf: https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-documents/320205004/320205004_Consent%20Agreement%20and%20Order_03182021_text.pdf

320205004_NOPV PCP PCO_03192020.pdf: https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-documents/320205004/320205004_NOPV%20PCP%20PCO_03192020.pdf

320205004_NOPV PCP PCO_03192020_text.pdf: https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-documents/320205004/320205004_NOPV%20PCP%20PCO_03192020_text.pdf

320205004_Operator Response to Notice and Request for Hearing_05222020.pdf: https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-documents/320205004/320205004_Operator%20Response%20to%20Notice%20and%20Request%20for%20Hearing_05222020.pdf

320205004_PHC Hearing Scheduled_06232020.pdf: https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-documents/320205004/320205004_PHC%20Hearing%20Scheduled_06232020.pdf

320205004_PHC Hearing Scheduled_06232020_text.pdf: https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-documents/320205004/320205004_PHC%20Hearing%20Scheduled_06232020_text.pdf

320205004_PHC Hearing Scheduled_06232020_text.pdf

June 23, 2020
VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL TO: GHopkins@velaw.com and Allan.Beshore@dot.gov
Mr. George C. Hopkins
Counsel for Pembina Cochin, LLC
Vinson & Elkins, LLP
2200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW
Suite 500 West
Washington, DC 20037
Mr. Allan C. Beshore
Director, Central Region
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
901 Locust Street, Suite 462
Kansas City, Missouri 64106
Re: Notice of Hearing, Pembina Cochin, LLC
CPF No. 3-2020-5004
Dear Mr. Hopkins and Mr. Beshore:
In accordance with 49 C.F.R. § 190.211, an informal hearing will be held regarding the Notice of
Probable Violation, Proposed Civil Penalty, and Proposed Compliance Order issued to Pembina
Cochin, LLC by the Office of Pipeline Safety in the above-referenced matter. The hearing will take
place via videoconference on October 21, 2020, beginning at 9:00 a.m. Central Time.
At least 10 calendar days prior to the hearing (or by October 11, 2020), both parties must submit
and exchange any additional written materials they intend to present at the hearing and a list of
attendees. This information should be provided electronically. Materials not submitted by this date
may be excluded. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at (202) 366-6139 or
Kristin.Baldwin@dot.gov.
Sincerely,
Kristin Baldwin
Presiding Official
cc: Ms. Melanie Stevens, Counsel, Central Region, Office of Pipeline Safety, PHMSA

320205004_NOPV PCP PCO_03192020_text.pdf

NOTICE OF PROBABLE VIOLATION
PROPOSED CIVIL PENALTY
and
PROPOSED COMPLIANCE ORDER
CERTIFIED MAIL - RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
March 19, 2020
Mr. Ron McClain
Vice President – Engineering and Operations
Kinder Morgan Cochin, LLC
500 Dallas Street, Suite 1000
Houston, Texas 77002
CPF 3-2020-5004
Dear Mr. McClain:
From June 7, 2016 through October 21, 2016, representatives of the Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA), Office of Pipeline Safety (OPS), pursuant to
Chapter 601 of 49 United States Code (U.S.C.), inspected your Kinder Morgan Cochin
facilities in Kankakee, Illinois, and Rodgers, North Dakota.
As a result of the inspection, it is alleged that you have committed probable violations of the
Pipeline Safety Regulations, Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). The items
inspected and the probable violations are:



1. §195.307 Pressure testing aboveground breakout tanks.
(c) For aboveground breakout tanks built to API Std 650 (incorporated by
reference, see §195.3) and first placed in service after October 2, 2000, testing
must be in accordance with sections 7.3.5 and 7.3.6 of API Standard 650
(incorporated by reference, see §195.3).
Kinder Morgan Cochin first placed in-service Tank 4 after October 2, 2000, located at
Kankakee, IL terminal and failed to pressure test Tank 4, in accordance with section
7.3.5 of API Standard 650. API Std 650 section 7.3.5, Testing of the Shell, states,
“If water is available for testing the shell, the tank shall be filled with water as
follows: (1) to the maximum design liquid level.”
Kinder Morgan’s “Technical Standard for Hydrostatic Testing” record for Kankakee
Tank 4 did not show the height of the water. Tank 4 has been in service since
December 1, 2014 and was in-service at the time of the PHMSA field inspection from
August 22 to August 26, 2016. Kinder Morgan Cochin could not produce evidence
that the water level for Tank 4 was filled to the maximum design liquid level.
2. §195.505 Qualification program.
Each operator shall have and follow a written qualification program. The
program shall include provisions to:
(b) Ensure through evaluation that individuals performing covered tasks are
qualified;
Kinder Morgan Cochin failed to follow its written operator qualification program to
ensure through evaluation that individuals performing covered tasks are qualified.
Kinder Morgan’s Operator Qualification program for Facilities Subject to DOT Parts
192 and 195 stated in Section 3.2, “KM employees and contractors performing
covered tasks are OQ-qualified by evaluating their knowledge, skill and ability. On
most tasks, this is accomplished by using a knowledge test and skill evaluation.”
Kinder Morgan Cochin’s records showed that Kinder Morgan utilized contractors to
perform the pig receiver modifications at the Rogers Pump Station on May 6, 2016.
On May 7, 2016, a leak occurred at the Rogers Pump Station. Kinder Morgan’s
internal investigation determined that the cause for the event was that the contractor
did not thoroughly tighten the threaded fitting upon completion of the modification
work.
After reviewing records from the Project Book for the Roger’s Receiver, PHMSA
requested the operator’s qualification records for the contractors who performed the
modification, to establish that they were qualified to perform the covered task. Kinder
Morgan Cochin did not produce any records to demonstrate that the contractor
2



employee or contractor supervisor were qualified to perform the required Kinder
Morgan Cochin covered task “104.14, General Pipeline Repair – Component
Replacement.”
After reviewing the incident investigation summary and further email correspondence
between PHMSA and Kinder Morgan Cochin, Kinder Morgan Cochin confirmed the
contractor’s employee was not qualified. The contractor’s employee did not have the
required third-party training elements to be operator qualified under Kinder Morgan
Cochin’s operator qualification program. The contractor employee was also not under
the direct supervision (span of control) of a qualified individual.
Proposed Civil Penalty
Under 49 U.S.C. § 60122 and 49 CFR § 190.223, you are subject to a civil penalty not to
exceed $218,647 per violation per day the violation persists, up to a maximum of $2,186,465
for a related series of violations. For violation occurring on or after November 27, 2018 and
before July 31, 2019, the maximum penalty may not exceed $213,268 per violation per day,
with a maximum penalty not to exceed $2,132,679. For violation occurring on or after
November 2, 2015 and before November 27, 2018, the maximum penalty may not exceed
$209,002 per violation per day, with a maximum penalty not to exceed $2,090,022. For
violations occurring prior to November 2, 2015, the maximum penalty may not exceed
$200,000 per violation per day, with a maximum penalty not to exceed $2,000,000 for a
related series of violations. The Compliance Officer has reviewed the circumstances and
supporting documentation involved for the above probable violation(s) and has recommended
that you be preliminarily assessed a civil penalty of $187,200 as follows:
Item number
PENALTY
1
2
$28,800
$158,400
Proposed Compliance Order
With respect to item 1 pursuant to 49 U.S.C. § 60118, the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration proposes to issue a Compliance Order to Kinder Morgan Cochin, LLC.
Please refer to the Proposed Compliance Order, which is enclosed and made a part of this
Notice.
Response to this Notice
Enclosed as part of this Notice is a document entitled Response Options for Pipeline
Operators in Compliance Proceedings. Please refer to this document and note the response
options. All material you submit in response to this enforcement action may be made publicly
available. If you believe that any portion of your responsive material qualifies for confidential
treatment under 5 U.S.C. 552(b), along with the complete original document you must provide
3



a second copy of the document with the portions you believe qualify for confidential
treatment redacted and an explanation of why you believe the redacted information qualifies
for confidential treatment under 5 U.S.C. 552(b).
Following the receipt of this Notice, you have 30 days to submit written comments, or request
a hearing under 49 CFR § 190.211. If you do not respond within 30 days of receipt of this
Notice, this constitutes a waiver of your right to contest the allegations in this Notice and
authorizes the Associate Administrator for Pipeline Safety to find facts as alleged in this
Notice without further notice to you and to issue a Final Order. If you are responding to this
Notice, we propose that you submit your correspondence to my office within 30 days from
receipt of this Notice. This period may be extended by written request for good cause.
In your correspondence on this matter, please refer to CPF 3-2020-5004 and, for each
document you submit, please provide a copy in electronic format whenever possible.
Sincerely,
Allan C. Beshore
Director, Central Region, OPS
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
Enclosures: Proposed Compliance Order
Response Options for Pipeline Operators in Compliance Proceedings
Cc: Mr. Darren Marine
Senior Executive
Pembina Cochin, LLC
4000, 585-8 AVE SW
Calgary, Alberta T2P1G1
Canada
dmarine@pembina.com
4



PROPOSED COMPLIANCE ORDER
Pursuant to 49 United States Code § 60118, the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety
Administration (PHMSA) proposes to issue to Kinder Morgan Cochin, LLC a Compliance
Order incorporating the following remedial requirements to ensure the compliance of Kinder
Morgan Cochin, LLC with the pipeline safety regulations:
1. 2. 3. In regard to Item Number 1 of the Notice pertaining to section 7.3.5 and 7.3.6
of API Standard 650, Kinder Morgan Cochin, LLC must successfully test Tank
4 and sufficiently document the test for Tank 4 per API Std 650 section 7.3.5
and 7.3.6.
In regard to Compliance Order Item Number 1 (above) Kinder Morgan Cochin
must complete this activity within 180 days of receipt of this order.
It is requested (not mandated) that Kinder Morgan Cochin, LLC maintain
documentation of the safety improvement costs associated with fulfilling this
Compliance Order and submit the total to Allan C. Beshore, Director, Central
Region, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration. It is
requested that these costs be reported in two categories: 1) total cost associated
with preparation/revision of plans, procedures, studies and analyses, and 2)
total cost associated with replacements, additions and other changes to pipeline
infrastructure.
5

320205004_Consent Agreement and Order_03182021_text.pdf

March 18, 2021
VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL TO: dmarine@pembina.com
Mr. Darren Marine
Vice President, Transmission Pipelines
Pembina Pipeline Corporation
4000, 585-8 Ave. SW
Calgary, Alberta T2P1G1, Canada
CPF No. 3-2020-5004
Dear Mr. Marine:
Enclosed please find a Consent Order incorporating the terms of the Consent Agreement between
the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) and Pembina Cochin, LLC,
which was executed on March 17, 2021. Service of the Consent Order and Consent Agreement by
electronic mail is deemed effective upon the date of transmission, or as otherwise provided under
49 C.F.R. § 190.5.
Thank you for your cooperation in this matter.
Sincerely,
Alan K. Mayberry
Associate Administrator
for Pipeline Safety
Enclosure: Order and Consent Agreement
cc: Mr. Gregory Ochs, Director, Central Region, Office of Pipeline Safety, PHMSA
Mr. George Casey Hopkins, Vinson & Elkins, LLP, Counsel for Pembina Conchin, LLC,
ghopkins@velaw.com
Ms. Cassia Prentice, Legal Counsel, Pembina Cochin, LLC, cprentice@pembina.com
CONFIRMATION OF RECEIPT REQUESTED



U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PIPELINE AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS SAFETY ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE OF PIPELINE SAFETY
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20590
__________________________________________
In the Matter of )
Pembina Cochin LLC, ) CPF No. 3-2020-5004
a subsidiary of Pembina U.S. Corporation, )
)
)
)
Respondent. )
__________________________________________)
CONSENT AGREEMENT AND ORDER
WHEREAS, on March 19, 2020, pursuant to 49 C.F.R. § 190.207, the Director, Central Region,
Office of Pipeline Safety, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA), U.S.
Department of Transportation (Director), issued a Notice of Probable Violation, Proposed Civil
Penalty and Proposed Compliance Order (Notice) to Kinder Morgan Cochin, LLC, which is now
known as Pembina Cochin LLC (Pembina Cochin or Respondent).1 The Notice alleged that
Respondent had violated the pipeline safety regulations in 49 C.F.R. Part 195 and proposed a civil
penalty of $187,200; and
WHEREAS, on April 22, 2020, Pembina Cochin submitted payment in the amount of $187,200,
and on April 24, 2020, requested an extension to respond to the Notice. The company requested a
second extension to respond on May 13, 2020, and on May 22, 2020, filed a response to the Notice,
contesting the allegations of violation, the proposed civil penalty, and the proposed compliance
order, and requesting an informal hearing; and
WHEREAS, the Director and Pembina Cochin held a meeting telephonically on August 17 and
October 29, 2020, to discuss resolution of this proceeding; and
WHEREAS, as result of these good-faith discussions, PHMSA and Respondent (collectively, the
Parties) have reached an agreement on the terms and conditions of a settlement, as set forth herein,
and agree that this Consent Agreement and Order (Agreement) will serve to avoid further
administrative proceedings or litigation, that it is the most appropriate means of resolving this
proceeding, and that it will promote the public interest by improving the safety performance of
Pembina Cochin’s pipeline system and advancing the enforcement and safety goals of PHMSA.
NOW, THEREFORE, upon consent and agreement of the Parties, it is Ordered and Adjudged as
follows:
1 Pembina U.S. Corporation is the parent company of Pembina Cochin LLC. Pembina Cochin LLC owns and operates
the U.S. portion of the Cochin Pipeline.



I. General Provisions.
1. For purposes of this Agreement, Pembina Cochin acknowledges that the portion of
the Cochin Pipeline in the United States and the Cochin Kankakee Terminal located in Kankakee
County, Illinois is subject to the jurisdiction of the Federal pipeline safety laws, 49 U.S.C. 60101, et
seq., and the regulations and administrative orders issued thereunder.
2. Pembina Cochin further acknowledges that it received proper notice of PHMSA’s
allegations in this proceeding and that the Notice states claims upon which relief may be granted
pursuant to 49 U. S.C. § 60101, et seq., and the regulations and orders issued thereunder.
3. The Parties agree to the terms of this Agreement, and Pembina Cochin agrees to
hereby waive any further procedural requirements with respect to its issuance. Pembina Cochin
further waives all rights to contest the validity of this Agreement, including all rights to
administrative or judicial hearings or appeals.
II. Findings of Fact and Violations.
4. Respondent acknowledges, and PHMSA hereby finds, that Pembina Cochin violated
49 C.F.R. § 195.307(c) (Item 1), as alleged in the Notice, by failing to pressure test Tank 4 at the
company’s Kankakee, Illinois terminal in accordance with section 7.3.5 of API Standard 650.
Specifically, Respondent was unable to provide any evidence that the water level for Tank 4 was
filled to the maximum design liquid level.
5. Respondent further acknowledges, and PHMSA hereby finds, that Pembina Cochin
violated 49 C.F.R. § 195.505(b) (Item 2), as alleged in the Notice, by failing to follow its own written
operator qualification program to ensure through evaluation that individuals performing covered
tasks are qualified. Specifically, Respondent utilized contractors to perform pig-receiver
modifications at its Rogers Pump Station, and on the following day in the early morning, a leak
occurred at said facility. Respondent’s internal investigation determined that the cause of the release
was a contractor’s failure to thoroughly tighten the threaded fitting upon completion of certain
modification work.
III. Civil Penalty.
6. Pembina Cochin further agrees to pay a civil penalty in the amount $14,400 in
connection with Item 1 of the Notice and $158,400 in connection with Item 2 of the Notice, for a
total civil penalty amount of $172,800.
7. PHMSA agrees to use reasonable efforts to assist Pembina Cochin in recouping the
excess civil penalty that has already been paid by Respondent to PHMSA, in amount of $14,400.
IV. Corrective Measures.
8. PHMSA agrees to withdraw the Proposed Compliance Order as written in the Notice,
and, instead, Respondent agrees to take the following Corrective Measures:



a. Pembina Cochin will complete an Engineering Assessment, to be performed by
third-party experts, to evaluate the fitness for service of Tank 4, using API 5792
finite element modeling of the applied stresses in the tank, weld residual stress
models, other API 579 requirements along with Welding Research Council
Bulletin 562, “Recommendations for Establishing the Minimum Pressurization
Temperature (MPT) for Equipment,” and models for material properties in the
fracture mechanics calculations. Pembina Cochin will provide to the Director the
qualifications of the third-party experts and the results of the Engineering
Assessment, including the impact on the maximum design level of Tank 4, within
60 days of the Effective Date of this Agreement; and
b. From the Effective Date of this Agreement until December 31, 2023, or the date
when Pembina Cochin performs an internal and external inspection of Tank 4
under API 653, 3 whichever is earlier, Pembina Cochin will implement the
measures referenced in Appendix A attached hereto with respect to Tank 4.
9. The Director may grant an extension of time for completion of any of the work to be
performed under Paragraphs 8(a) and 8(b) upon Respondent’s timely, written request that
demonstrates both good cause for an extension and provides sufficient detail to enable the Director
to evaluate Respondent’s request. A timely request should be submitted at least 15 calendar days
prior to the date on which the work at issue is due to be submitted to the Director.
10. Respondent agrees to maintain documentation of the costs associated with
implementation of the actions specified in Paragraphs 8(a) and 8(b), including Appendix A, and
agrees to make this information available to PHMSA upon request.
V. Miscellaneous.
11. Nothing in this Agreement affects or relieves Pembina Cochin of its responsibility to
comply with all applicable requirements of the Federal pipeline safety laws, 49 U.S.C. § 60101, et
seq., and the regulations and orders issued thereunder. Nothing in this Agreement alters PHMSA’s
right of access, entry, inspection, and information gathering, or its authority to bring any enforcement
action against Pembina Cochin pursuant to the Federal pipeline safety laws, the regulations and
orders issued thereunder, or any other provision of Federal or state law.
12. This Agreement does not waive or modify any Federal, state, or local laws or
regulations applicable to Pembina Cochin’s pipeline system. This Agreement is not a permit or a
modification of a permit under any Federal, state, or local laws or regulations. Pembina Cochin
remains responsible for achieving and maintaining compliance with all applicable Federal, state, and
local laws, regulations and permits.
13. This Agreement constitutes the final, complete, and exclusive agreement and
understanding between the Parties with respect to the settlement embodied in this Agreement. The
Parties acknowledge that there are no representations, agreements, or understandings relating to the
2 ASME - API 579-1/ASME FFS-1, Fitness-For-Service, June 2016.
3 API Standard 653, “Tank Inspection, Repair, Alteration, and Reconstruction,” 3rd edition, December 2001,
(including addendum 1 (September 2003), addendum 2 (November 2005), addendum 3 (February 2008), and errata
(April 2008)), which is incorporated by reference into 49 CFR Part 195.



settlement other than those expressly contained in this Agreement, except that the terms of this
Agreement may be construed by reference to the Notice.
14. This Agreement does not create rights in, or grant any cause of action to, any person
not a party to this Agreement. PHMSA is not liable for any injuries or damages to persons or
property arising from acts or omissions of Pembina Cochin or its officers, employees, or agents
carrying out the work required by this Agreement. PHMSA, its officers, employees, agents, and
representatives are not liable for any cause of action arising from any acts or omissions of Pembina
Cochin or its contractors in carrying out any work required by this Agreement.
15. purchasers.
This Agreement shall apply to and be binding on PHMSA and Pembina Cochin, its
officers, directors, employees, successors and assigns, including, but not limited to, subsequent
16. For all transfers of ownership or operating responsibility of Pembina Cochin’s
pipeline system, Respondent will provide notice of the transfer to PHMSA through the National
Registry of Operators no later than 60 days after the transfer occurs, consistent with the requirements
of 49 C.F.R. § 191.22(c)(2).
VI. Enforcement
17. This Agreement is subject to all enforcement authorities available to PHMSA under
49 U.S.C. §60101, et seq., and 49 C.F.R. Part 190, including administrative civil penalties under
49 U.S.C. §60122, and referral of the case to the Attorney General for judicial enforcement, if
PHMSA determines that Respondent is not complying with the terms of this Agreement in
accordance with determinations made by the Director, or if appealed, in accordance with decisions
of the Associate Administrator.
VII. Effective Date.
18. The “Effective Date” is the date on which this Agreement has been signed by both
Pembina Cochin and PHMSA.
VIII. Termination.
19. Respondent may request that the Director close this case on or after December 31,
2023, or after the date when Pembina Cochin performs an internal and external inspection of Tank
4 under API 653, whichever is earlier. Closure of the case will result in termination of the
Agreement.
IX. Ratification.
20. The Parties’ undersigned representatives certify that they are fully authorized to enter
into the terms and conditions of this Agreement and to execute and legally bind such party to this
document.



PEMBINA COCHIN LLC PIPELINE AND HAZARDOUS
MATERIALS ADMINISTRATION,
OFFICE OF PIPELINE SAFETY
___________________________ ___________________________
Name: Darren Marine Name: Alan K. Mayberry
Title: Vice President, Transmission Pipelines Title: Associate Administrator for Pipeline
Safety
March 16, 2021 March 17, 2021
___________________________ ___________________________
Date: Date:

320205004_Closure Letter_12162024_(16-153531S)_text.pdf

VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL TO: SBurrows@Pembina.com; BBachmeier@Pembina.com;
December 16, 2024
Mr. Scott Burrows
President and Chief Executive Officer,
Pembina Cochin, LLC
4000, 585-8 AVE SW
Calgary, AB Canada T2P 1G1
RE: CPF 3-2020-5004
Dear Mr. Burrows:
On March 18, 2021, the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA)
issued to Pembina Cochin, LLC (Pembina) a Consent Order incorporating the terms of the
Consent Agreement between the parties. This Consent Order included a Civil Penalty assessment
and a requirement to take corrective actions on your pipeline. Based on our review of the
documentation provided by your staff and confirmation of payment of the civil penalty, it has
been determined that Pembina has complied with the terms of the Consent Order.
Accordingly, this case is now closed, and no further action is contemplated with respect to the
matters involved in this case. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter.
Sincerely,
Gregory A. Ochs
Director, Central Region, Office of Pipeline Safety
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
cc: Bob Bachmeier, Manager of Regulatory and Environmental, US Operations, Pembina
Cochin, BBachmeier@Pembina.com
- **truncated:** false
- **body characters:** 25685