# ENABLE GAS TRANSMISSION, LLC — Warning Letter

- **operation:** document
- **citation:** CPF 420111016W
- **title:** ENABLE GAS TRANSMISSION, LLC — Warning Letter
- **source type:** enforcement
- **agency:** Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
- **status:** historical
- **official:** true
- **published on:** 2011-12-08
- **effective on:** Not available
- **summary:** CLOSED warning letter citing 192.605.
- **machine formats:** - **json:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-enforcement-420111016w.json
- **markdown:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-enforcement-420111016w.md
- **app url:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-enforcement-420111016w
- **source url:** https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-data/case/420111016W
**body:**

Warning Letter involving ENABLE GAS TRANSMISSION, LLC. PHMSA's enforcement data identifies the cited regulation as 192.605. The case was opened on 2011-12-08 and is reported as closed as of 2011-12-08. Open the official case record for notices, responses, orders, and the latest status.

Official case documents:

420111016W_Warning Letter_12082011.pdf: https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-documents/420111016W/420111016W_Warning%20Letter_12082011.pdf

420111016W_Warning Letter_12082011_text.pdf: https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-documents/420111016W/420111016W_Warning%20Letter_12082011_text.pdf

420111016W_Warning Letter_12082011_text.pdf

WARNING LETTER
CERTIFIED MAIL - RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
December 8, 2011
Mr. Pete Kirsch
Senior VP Pipeline Operations & Engineering
Centerpoint Energy Gas Transmission
1111 Louisiana Street
Houston, TX 77002
CPF 4-2011-1016W
Dear Mr. Kirsch:
On various days between February 28 and June 10, 2011, a representative of the
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) pursuant to Chapter
601 of 49 United States Code inspected your natural gas pipeline system.
As a result of the inspection, it appears that you have committed a probable violation of
the Pipeline Safety Regulations, Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations. The item
inspected and the probable violation is:
1. § 192.605 Procedural manual for operations, maintenance, and
emergencies.
(a) General. Each operator shall prepare and follow for each pipeline, a
manual of written procedures for conducting operations and maintenance
activities and for emergency response. For transmission lines, the manual
must also include procedures for handling abnormal operations. This
manual must be reviewed and updated by the operator at intervals not
exceeding 15 months, but at least once each calendar year. This manual
must be prepared before operations of a pipeline system commence.
Appropriate parts of the manual must be kept at locations where
operations and maintenance activities are conducted.



Centerpoint Energy Gas Transmission (CEGT) personnel did not follow procedures as
described in the following paragraphs.
In regards to monitoring internal corrosion coupons CEGT’s “Internal Corrosion
Coupons” procedures, Document Number PS-03-02-294, page 4 of 5, requires the
examination of coupons at least twice each calendar year, but with intervals not
exceeding 7 ½ months. CEGT’s maintenance records indicated internal corrosion
coupon monitoring exceeded 7 ½ months for those coupons located in Waskum on Line
S, and in Caddo Pine Island on Line ST-15. Coupon on Line S went 9 ½ months in
2009, and coupon on Line ST-15 went 11 ½ months in 2010 between monitoring cycles.
Also, during the inspection PHMSA asked CEGT personnel to perform a covered task to
demonstrate the necessary knowledge, skill and ability. We refer to this as a Protocol 9
– Operator Qualification (OQ) Field Inspection. CEGT personnel did not follow
company Operations and Maintenance (O&M) procedures. CEGT Rectifier Inspection
procedure, Document Number PS-03-02-242, Section 2.4, requires personnel to check
the rectifier cabinet with a multi-meter referenced to ground before grasping the padlock
to ensure there is not an electrical short through the rectifier cabinet. Once it has been
established that there is not a short, unlock the rectifier and open the cabinet. The
CEGT Technician failed to use a multi-meter to check for shorts on the rectifier cabinet,
prior to grasping the padlock. This indicates that CEGT personnel failed to follow O&M
procedures while conducting an O&M activity. This is important as the procedure was
established to protect the employee and not following the procedure places
unnecessary risk on the employee.
CEGT Compressor Station Gas Detection Testing procedures, Procedure Number 310,
Part B, requires that 50% lower explosive limit (LEL) calibration gas be applied to
detection cells for verification that siren and blue lights are activated at 20% LEL. This
will also verify cells are properly calibrated. During an OQ protocol 9 observation of a
CEGT O&M Technician, he used his mouth to blow on the tube used to attach
calibration tank to gas detection sensor. CEGT procedures do not indicate where
blowing on tube is allowed or required to test gas detection equipment. This indicates
that CEGT personnel failed to follow O&M procedures while conducting an O&M
activity.
Under 49 United States Code, § 60122, you are subject to a civil penalty not to exceed
$100,000 for each violation for each day the violation persists up to a maximum of
$1,000,000 for any related series of violations. We have reviewed the circumstances
and supporting documents involved in this case, and have decided not to conduct
additional enforcement action or penalty assessment proceedings at this time. We
advise you to correct the item(s) identified in this letter. Failure to do so will result in
Centerpoint Energy Gas Transmission being subject to additional enforcement action.
2



No reply to this letter is required. If you choose to reply, in your correspondence please
refer to CPF 4-2011-1016W. Be advised that all material you submit in response to this
enforcement action is subject to being made publicly available. If you believe that any
portion of your responsive material qualifies for confidential treatment under 5 U.S.C.
552(b), along with the complete original document you must provide a second copy of
the document with the portions you believe qualify for confidential treatment redacted
and an explanation of why you believe the redacted information qualifies for confidential
treatment under 5 U.S.C. 552(b).
Sincerely,
R. M. Seeley
Director, Southwest Region
Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration
3
- **truncated:** false
- **body characters:** 5789
