{"operation":"document","citation":"CPF 420145012","title":"CHEVRON PIPE LINE CO — Notice of Probable Violation","source_type":"enforcement","agency":"Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration","status":"historical","official":true,"published_on":"2014-05-21","effective_on":null,"summary":"CLOSED notice of probable violation citing 195.442(a), 199.105(b), 199.225(a), 199.225(a)(2)(i).","machine_formats":{"json":"https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-enforcement-420145012.json","markdown":"https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-enforcement-420145012.md"},"app_url":"https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-enforcement-420145012","source_url":"https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-data/case/420145012","body":"Notice of Probable Violation involving CHEVRON PIPE LINE CO. PHMSA's enforcement data identifies the cited regulations as 195.442(a),  199.105(b),  199.225(a),  199.225(a)(2)(i). The case was opened on 2014-05-21 and is reported as closed as of 2015-02-12. Proposed civil penalty: $158,400. Assessed civil penalty: $158,400. Open the official case record for notices, responses, orders, and the latest status.\n\nOfficial case documents:\n\n420145012_Closure_02122015.pdf: https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-documents/420145012/420145012_Closure_02122015.pdf\n\n420145012_Closure_02122015_text.pdf: https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-documents/420145012/420145012_Closure_02122015_text.pdf\n\n420145012_Final Order_11042014.pdf: https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-documents/420145012/420145012_Final%20Order_11042014.pdf\n\n420145012_Final Order_11042014_text.pdf: https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-documents/420145012/420145012_Final%20Order_11042014_text.pdf\n\n420145012_NOPV PCP PCO_05212014.pdf: https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-documents/420145012/420145012_NOPV%20PCP%20PCO_05212014.pdf\n\n420145012_NOPV PCP PCO_05212014_text.pdf: https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-documents/420145012/420145012_NOPV%20PCP%20PCO_05212014_text.pdf\n\n420145012_Operator Response to Notice_06252014.pdf: https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-documents/420145012/420145012_Operator%20Response%20to%20Notice_06252014.pdf\n\n420145012_NOPV PCP PCO_05212014_text.pdf\n\nNOTICE OF PROBABLE VIOLATION\nPROPOSED CIVIL PENALTY\nand\nPROPOSED COMPLIANCE ORDER\nCERTIFIED MAIL - RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED\nMay 21, 2014\nMr. Randy Curry\nPresident\nChevron Pipe Line Company\n4800 Fournace Place\nBellaire, TX 77401-2324\nCPF 4-2014-5012\nDear Mr. Curry:\nOn November 14, 2013, Chevron Pipe Line Company (CPL) experienced an excavation related\naccident on its West Texas LPG Pipeline System 10-inch Loop Line near Milford, TX\n(approximate Mile Post (MP) 39.44). As a result of this accident, a representative of the Pipeline\nand Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA), Office of Pipeline Safety (OPS),\npursuant to Chapter 601 of 49 United States Code conducted an accident investigation and\nperformed an inspection of your related Damage Prevention practices.\nAs a result of the investigation and inspection, it appears that you have committed probable\nviolations of the Pipeline Safety Regulations, Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations. The items\ninspected and the probable violation(s) are:\n1. §195.442 Damage prevention program.\n(a) Except as provided in paragraph (d) of this section, each operator of a\nburied pipeline must carry out, in accordance with this section, a written\nprogram to prevent damage to that pipeline from excavation activities.\n\n\n\nCPL’s damage prevention program failed to prevent damage to its pipeline from excavation\nactivities being performed by a second party contractor. On November 14, 2013, at 9:30 am,\nCPL’s 10” West Texas LPG line was struck by their contractor installing cathodic protection\nfacilities. As a result of incorrect facility location, the contractor placed a drilling rig directly\nover a 10-inch LPG pipeline and punctured the line with his drilling equipment. The line\nruptured and subsequently ignited.\nPrior to the start of excavation, the pipeline’s location was identified incorrectly by CPL\npersonnel, causing the pipeline to be damaged during the excavation activities being overseen by\nthe operator. CPL generally followed the CPL damage prevention procedures, but the operator’s\ndamage prevention procedures lacked sufficient detail to ensure that the marking was performed\nproperly.\nThe primary CPL procedure used for second-party excavation was Section 5 of the Core Liquids\nManual. This procedure instructed the CPL personnel performing line locating to:\n4) Use maps, as built documents, and other available data as necessary to\nassist in verifying that all facilities in a specific area are located and\nmarked. If omissions or errors are discovered in facility mapping during\nthe course of a locating activity, corrections must be submitted to the GIS\nAnalyst in a timely manner.\nCPL’s procedure was not specific or detailed enough to ensure that the proper maps and locating\ntechniques were used by the CPL employee performing the line locating. The CPL employee\nused his DeLorme Maps, the facility signs and markers at the jobsite and the location of the\nabove ground 14-inch valve for information and located the pipeline using his RD8000 pipeline\nlocator set to CP mode. CPL’s two parallel lines in the right of way crossed each other several\ntimes and the accuracy of the DeLorme Maps as well as the disposition of an abandoned pipeline\nin the area were not fully investigated. The pipeline employee did not use any other pipeline\nmaps or drawings. No additional line locating was performed, and the location below the\nproposed drilling site was not probed or checked by hand digging prior to starting the drilling\noperations. This was not a requirement of the CPL Damage Prevention procedure or Excavation\nHES 202 for second party foreign line crossings, but was a requirement for third party foreign\nline crossings (Core Liquids Manual Section 5, Foreign Line Crossing Procedure MIP 206).\n2. §199.105 Drug tests required.\nEach operator shall conduct the following drug tests for the presence of a prohibited\ndrug:\n(b) Post-accident testing. As soon as possible but no later than 32 hours after an\naccident, an operator shall drug test each employee whose performance either\n2\n\n\n\ncontributed to the accident or cannot be completely discounted as a contributing\nfactor to the accident. An operator may decide not to test under this paragraph but\nsuch a decision must be based on the best information available immediately after\nthe accident that the employee's performance could not have contributed to the\naccident or that, because of the time between that performance and the accident, it\nis not likely that a drug test would reveal whether the performance was affected by\ndrug use.\nCPL failed to conduct post-accident drug testing within 32 hours for the employee performing\nline locating and marking prior for the accident that occurred on November 14, 2013 at 0933\nhours local time. The post-accident testing was completed at 9:45 p.m. on November 15, 2013, a\nlittle more than 4 hours past the 32 hour limit for testing to be completed.\n3. §199.225 Alcohol tests required.\nEach operator shall conduct the following types of alcohol tests for the presence of\nalcohol:\n(a) Post-accident. (1) As soon as practicable following an accident, each operator\nshall test each surviving covered employee for alcohol if that employee's\nperformance of a covered function either contributed to the accident or cannot be\ncompletely discounted as a contributing factor to the accident. The decision not to\nadminister a test under this section shall be based on the operator's determination,\nusing the best available information at the time of the determination that the\ncovered employee's performance could not have contributed to the accident.\n(2)(i) If a test required by this section is not administered within 2 hours following\nthe accident, the operator shall prepare and maintain on file a record stating the\nreasons the test was not promptly administered. If a test required by paragraph (a)\nis not administered within 8 hours following the accident, the operator shall cease\nattempts to administer an alcohol test and shall state in the record the reasons for\nnot administering the test.\nCPL failed to conduct post-accident alcohol testing within 8 hours for the employee performing\nline locating and marking prior for the accident that occurred on November 14, 2013 at 0933\nhours local time. The post-accident testing was completed at 9:45 p.m. on November 15, 2013, a\nlittle more than 28 hours past the 8 hour limit for testing to be completed.\nProposed Civil Penalty\nUnder 49 United States Code, § 60122, you are subject to a civil penalty not to exceed $200,000\nper violation per day the violation persists up to a maximum of $2,000,000 for a related series of\nviolations. For violations occurring prior to January 4, 2012, the maximum penalty may not\nexceed $100,000 per violation per day, with a maximum penalty not to exceed $1,000,000 for a\n3\n\n\n\nrelated series of violations. The Compliance Officer has reviewed the circumstances and\nsupporting documentation involved in the above probable violation(s) and has recommended that\nyou be preliminarily assessed a civil penalty of $158,400 for item 1.\nProposed Compliance Order\nWith respect to Item 1, pursuant to 49 United States Code § 60118, PHMSA proposes to issue a\nCompliance Order to CPL. Please refer to the Proposed Compliance Order, which is enclosed\nand made a part of this Notice.\nWarning Items\nWith respect to items 2 and 3, we have reviewed the circumstances and supporting documents\ninvolved in this case and have decided not to conduct additional enforcement action or penalty\nassessment proceedings at this time. We advise you to promptly correct these item(s). Failure to\ndo so may result in additional enforcement action.\nResponse to this Notice\nEnclosed as part of this Notice is a document entitled Response Options for Pipeline Operators\nin Compliance Proceedings. Please refer to this document and note the response options. All\nmaterial you submit in response to this enforcement action may be made publicly available. If\nyou believe that any portion of your responsive material qualifies for confidential treatment\nunder 5 U.S.C. 552(b), along with the complete original document you must provide a second\ncopy of the document with the portions you believe qualify for confidential treatment redacted\nand an explanation of why you believe the redacted information qualifies for confidential\ntreatment under 5 U.S.C. 552(b). If you do not respond within 30 days of receipt of this Notice,\nthis constitutes a waiver of your right to contest the allegations in this Notice and authorizes the\nAssociate Administrator for Pipeline Safety to find facts as alleged in this Notice without further\nnotice to you and to issue a Final Order.\nIn your correspondence on this matter, please refer to CPF 4-2014-5012 and for each\ndocument you submit, please provide a copy in electronic format whenever possible.\nSincerely,\nR. M. Seeley\nDirector, Southwest Region\nPipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration\nEnclosures: Proposed Compliance Order\nResponse Options for Pipeline Operators in Compliance Proceedings\n4\n\n\n\nPROPOSED COMPLIANCE ORDER\nPursuant to 49 United States Code § 60118, the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety\nAdministration (PHMSA) proposes to issue to Chevron Pipe Line Company (CPL) a Compliance\nOrder incorporating the following remedial requirements to ensure the compliance of CPL with\nthe pipeline safety regulations:\n1. In regard to Item Number 1 of the Notice pertaining to CPL’s Damage Prevention\nprocesses; CPL shall revise its damage prevention procedures to ensure that all excavation,\nwhether first, second or third-party receive the same level of response and risk management\nto prevent damage to pipeline facilities.\n2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. In regard to Item Number 1 of the Notice pertaining to CPL’s Damage Prevention process;\nCPL shall perform further investigation, including excavation as necessary to positively\ndetermine the disposition of the abandoned pipeline that was replaced by the installation of\nthe 10-inch Loop Line in 1988. CPL shall determine if any other similar locations exist\nwithin the West Texas LPG System and develop a mechanism for communicating to\nemployees performing line locating activities where potentially abandoned pipelines may\nexist through drawings or records that shall be utilized during the line locating process.\nIn regard to Item 1 of the Notice pertaining to CPL’s Damage Prevention processes; CPL\nshall provide a method for physical marking and identification in the field for all CP test\nstations in right-of-ways containing parallel or multiple CPL lines in the West Texas LPG\nSystem to identify the pipeline to which the test station is connected. CPL shall update the\nDeLorme Mapping with the information collected from the field activities conducted under\nthis item to ensure the accuracy of the CP records.\nIn regard to Items 1 through 3 of the Notice, all revised procedures resulting from the CPL\nRCA, requirements of this Order, or revisions to the CPL Damage Prevention Program\nshall be summarized in a listing and copies of each procedure or Plan shall be submitted in\ntheir entirety in final form to PHMSA, Southwest Region for review.\nCPL shall carry out training for all affected employees to cover the procedural revisions\nresulting from this Order to specifically include supervisory personnel. CPL shall submit a\ntraining plan to PHMSA which identifies the affected procedures and proposed training\nschedule for approval prior to implementation.\nCPL shall complete Items 1 through 5 no later than 90 days after the issuance of the Final\nOrder.\nIt is requested (not mandated) that CPL maintain documentation of the safety improvement\ncosts associated with fulfilling this Compliance Order and submit the total to Rod Seeley,\nDirector, Southwest Region, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration. It is\nrequested that these costs be reported in two categories: 1) total cost associated with\npreparation/revision of plans, procedures, studies and analyses, and 2) total cost associated\nwith replacements, additions and other changes to pipeline infrastructure.\n\n420145012_Closure_02122015_text.pdf\n\nCERTIFIED MAIL - RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED\nFebruary 12, 2015\nMr. Randy Curry\nPresident\nChevron Pipe Line Company\n4800 Fournace Place\nBellaire, TX 77401-2324\nCPF 4-2014-5012\nDear Mr. Curry:\nOn November 14, 2013, Chevron Pipe Line Company (CPL) experienced an excavation related\naccident on its West Texas LPG Pipeline System 10-inch Loop Line near Milford, TX\n(approximate Mile Post (MP) 39.44). As a result of this accident, a representative of the Pipeline\nand Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA), Office of Pipeline Safety (OPS),\npursuant to Chapter 601 of 49 United States Code conducted an accident investigation and\nperformed an inspection of your related Damage Prevention practices.\nAs a result of the investigation and inspection, a Notice of Probable Violation, with a Proposed\nCivil Penalty and Proposed Compliance Order (NOPV) was issued under case file CPF 4-2014-\n5012 to CPL in a letter dated May 21, 2014. On November 4, 2014, PHMSA issued a Final\nOrder in the matter which was received by Chevron on November 17, 2014. In a letter dated\nFebruary 2, 2015, Chevron responded to the Final Order with a letter summarizing its actions\nand requesting closure of the case.\nThis letter is to inform you no further action is necessary and this case is now closed. Thank you\nfor your cooperation.\nSincerely,\nR. M. Seeley\nDirector, Southwest Region\nPipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration\n\n420145012_Final Order_11042014_text.pdf\n\nNOVEMBER 4, 2014\nMr. Al Williams\nPresident\nChevron Pipe Line Company\n4800 Fournace Place\nBellaire, TX 77401-2324\nRe: CPF No. 4-2014-5012\nDear Mr. Williams:\nEnclosed please find the Final Order issued in the above-referenced case. It makes a finding of\nviolation, assesses a civil penalty of $158,400, and specifies actions that need to be taken by\nChevron Pipe Line Company to comply with the pipeline safety regulations. This is to\nacknowledge receipt of payment of the full penalty amount, by wire transfer dated July 30, 2014.\nWhen the terms of the compliance order have been completed, as determined by the Director,\nSouthwest Region, this enforcement action will be closed. Service of the Final Order by\ncertified mail is deemed effective upon the date of mailing, or as otherwise provided under\n49 C.F.R. § 190.5.\nThank you for your cooperation in this matter.\nSincerely,\nJeffrey D. Wiese\nAssociate Administrator\nfor Pipeline Safety\nEnclosure\ncc: Mr. R.M. Seeley, Director, Southwest Region, OPS\nMr. James M. Barnum, Vice President, Chevron Pipe Line Company,\n4800 Fournace Place, Bellaire, TX 77401-2324\nCERTIFIED MAIL - RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED\n\n\n\nU.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION\nPIPELINE AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS SAFETY ADMINISTRATION\nOFFICE OF PIPELINE SAFETY\nWASHINGTON, D.C. 20590\n____________________________________\n)\nIn the Matter of )\n)\nChevron Pipe Line Company, ) CPF No. 4-2014-5012\n)\nRespondent. )\n____________________________________)\nFINAL ORDER\nPursuant to 49 U.S.C. § 60117, a representative of the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety\nAdministration (PHMSA), Office of Pipeline Safety (OPS), conducted an investigation of an\naccident involving the pipeline system operated by Chevron Pipe Line Company (CPL or\nRespondent) near Milford, Texas. CPL, an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Chevron\nCorporation, operates approximately 10,000 miles of pipeline transporting crude oil, refined\npetroleum products, liquefied petroleum gas, natural gas and chemicals within the United\nStates.1\nThe investigation arose out of an excavation-related accident on CPL’s West Texas LPG\nPipeline System that occurred on November 14, 2013.\nAs a result of the investigation, the Director, Southwest Region, OPS (Director), issued to\nRespondent, by letter dated May 21, 2014, a Notice of Probable Violation, Proposed Civil\nPenalty, and Proposed Compliance Order (Notice), which also included warnings pursuant to\n49 C.F.R. § 190.205. In accordance with 49 C.F.R. § 190.207, the Notice proposed finding that\nCPL had violated 49 C.F.R. § 195.442 and proposed assessing a civil penalty of $158,400 for the\nalleged violation. The Notice also proposed ordering Respondent to take certain measures to\ncorrect the alleged violation. The warning items required no further action, but warned the\noperator to correct the probable violations.\nCPL responded to the Notice by letter dated June 25, 2014 (Response). The company did not\ncontest the allegation of violation and paid the proposed civil penalty of $158,400 as provided in\n49 C.F.R. § 190.227. The company also provided information concerning the corrective actions\nit had taken. Respondent did not request a hearing and therefore has waived its right to one.\n1 See http://chevronpipeline.com/about/ (last accessed on September 9, 2014).\n\n\n\n2\nFINDING OF VIOLATION\nIn its Response, CPL did not contest the allegation in the Notice that it violated 49 C.F.R. Part\n195, as follows:\nItem 1: The Notice alleged that Respondent violated 49 C.F.R. § 195.442, which states in\nrelevant part:\n§ 195.442 Damage prevention program.\n(a) Except as provided in paragraph (d) of this section, each operator\nof a buried pipeline must carry out, in accordance with this section, a\nwritten program to prevent damage to that pipeline from excavation\nactivities….\nThe Notice alleged that Respondent violated 49 C.F.R. § 195.442 by failing to carry out a written\nprogram to prevent damage to its pipeline from excavation activities. Specifically, the Notice\nalleged that CPL’s written damage prevention program lacked sufficient detail to ensure that the\npipeline marking was performed properly prior to excavation. Respondent did not contest this\nallegation of violation. Accordingly, based upon a review of all of the evidence, I find that\nRespondent violated 49 C.F.R. § 195.442 by failing to carry out a written program to prevent\ndamage to its pipeline from excavation activities.\nThis finding of violation will be considered a prior offense in any subsequent enforcement action\ntaken against Respondent.\nASSESSMENT OF PENALTY\nUnder 49 U.S.C. § 60122, Respondent is subject to an administrative civil penalty not to exceed\n$200,000 per violation for each day of the violation, up to a maximum of $2,000,000 for any\nrelated series of violations.2 In determining the amount of a civil penalty under 49 U.S.C.\n§ 60122 and 49 C.F.R. § 190.225, I must consider the following criteria: the nature,\ncircumstances, and gravity of the violation, including adverse impact on the environment; the\ndegree of Respondent’s culpability; the history of Respondent’s prior offenses; and any effect\nthat the penalty may have on its ability to continue doing business; and the good faith of\nRespondent in attempting to comply with the pipeline safety regulations. In addition, I may\nconsider the economic benefit gained from the violation without any reduction because of\nsubsequent damages, and such other matters as justice may require. The Notice proposed a civil\npenalty of $158,400 for the violation cited above.\nItem 1: The Notice proposed a civil penalty of $158,400 for Respondent’s violation of\n49 C.F.R. § 195.442, for failing to carry out a written program to prevent damage to its pipeline\n2 The Pipeline Safety, Regulatory Certainty, and Job Creation Act of 2011, Pub. L. No. 112-90, § 2(a)(1), 125 Stat.\n1904, January 3, 2012, increased the civil penalty liability for violating a pipeline safety standard to $200,000 per\nviolation for each day of the violation, up to a maximum of $2,000,000 for any related series of violations.\n\n\n\n3\nfrom excavation activities. This was a serious violation which resulted in a pipeline accident.\nChevron is culpable for the violation and has neither contested the allegation nor presented any\nevidence or argument justifying a reduction in the proposed penalty. Accordingly, having\nreviewed the record and considered the assessment criteria, I assess Respondent a civil penalty of\n$158,400 for violation of 49 C.F.R. § 195.442, which amount has already been paid by\nRespondent.\nCOMPLIANCE ORDER\nThe Notice proposed a compliance order with respect to Item 1 in the Notice for violation of\n49 C.F.R. § 195.442. Under 49 U.S.C. § 60118(a), each person who engages in the\ntransportation of hazardous liquids or who owns or operates a pipeline facility is required to\ncomply with the applicable safety standards established under chapter 601. Pursuant to the\nauthority of 49 U.S.C. § 60118(b) and 49 C.F.R. § 190.217, Respondent is ordered to take the\nfollowing actions to ensure compliance with the pipeline safety regulations applicable to its\noperations:\n1. With respect to the violation of § 195.442 (Item 1), Respondent must revise its\ndamage prevention procedures to ensure that all excavation-related activities receive\nappropriate CPL response and risk management to prevent damage to pipeline\nfacilities. Respondent must train all affected employees, including supervisory\npersonnel, on the revised procedures. Respondent must submit a training plan\nidentifying the affected procedures and proposed training schedule to the Director,\nSouthwest Region, for approval prior to implementation.\n2. With respect to the violation of § 195.442 (Item 1), Respondent must perform\nfurther investigation to determine the disposition of the abandoned pipeline that was\nreplaced in 1988 by the 10-inch Loop Line that was damaged in this accident. CPL\nmust determine whether similar locations exist within the West Texas LPG System\nand develop a mechanism for accounting for abandoned facilities during the line\nlocating process.\n3. With respect to the violation of § 195.442 (Item 1), PHMSA suggests that\nRespondent develop and implement a method for physical marking and identification\nof its test stations in rights-of-way containing multiple CPL lines in the West Texas\nLPG System to identify the pipeline to which the test station is connected. CPL maps\nand records should be updated with the information collected using this method.\n4. CPL must provide all revised procedures and records demonstrating completion of\nthe items listed above to the Director, Southwest Region, for review within 90 days of\nreceipt of the Final Order.\nThe Director may grant an extension of time to comply with any of the required items upon a\nwritten request timely submitted by the Respondent and demonstrating good cause for an\nextension.\n\n\n\n4\nFailure to comply with this Final Order [CPF No. 4-2014-5012] may result in the administrative\nassessment of civil penalties not to exceed $200,000 for each violation for each day the violation\ncontinues or in referral to the Attorney General for appropriate relief in a district court of the\nUnited States.\nWARNING ITEMS\nWith respect to Items 2 and 3, the Notice alleged probable violations of Part 199 but did not\npropose a civil penalty or compliance order for these items. Therefore, these are considered to\nbe warning items. The warnings were for:\n49 C.F.R. § 199.105 (Item 2) ─ Respondent’s alleged failure to drug test an\nemployee whose performance could not be completely discounted as a\ncontributing factor to the accident within 32 hours after the accident; and\n49 C.F.R. § 199.225 (Item 3) ─ Respondent’s alleged failure to alcohol test an\nemployee whose performance could not be completely discounted as a\ncontributing factor to the accident within 8 hours after the accident.\nCPL presented information in its Response showing that it had taken certain actions to address\nthe cited items. If OPS finds a violation of any of these items in a subsequent inspection,\nRespondent may be subject to future enforcement action.\nUnder 49 C.F.R. § 190.215, Respondent has a right to submit a Petition for Reconsideration of\nthis Final Order. The petition must be sent to: Associate Administrator, Office of Pipeline\nSafety, PHMSA, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE, East Building, 2nd Floor, Washington, DC\n20590, with a copy sent to the Office of Chief Counsel, PHMSA, at the same address. PHMSA\nwill accept petitions received no later than 20 days after receipt of service of this Final Order by\nthe Respondent, provided they contain a brief statement of the issue(s) and meet all other\nrequirements of 49 C.F.R. § 190.215. Unless the Associate Administrator, upon request, grants a\nstay, the terms and conditions of this Final Order are effective upon service in accordance with\n49 C.F.R. § 190.5.\n___________________________________ __________________________\nJeffrey D. Wiese Date Issued\nAssociate Administrator\nfor Pipeline Safety","truncated":false,"body_characters":26130}