# FLORIDA GAS TRANSMISSION CO — Warning Letter

- **operation:** document
- **citation:** CPF 42023026WL
- **title:** FLORIDA GAS TRANSMISSION CO — Warning Letter
- **source type:** enforcement
- **agency:** Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
- **status:** historical
- **official:** true
- **published on:** 2023-05-08
- **effective on:** Not available
- **summary:** CLOSED warning letter citing 191.23(a)(9), 192.917(b).
- **machine formats:** - **json:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-enforcement-42023026wl.json
- **markdown:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-enforcement-42023026wl.md
- **app url:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-enforcement-42023026wl
- **source url:** https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-data/case/42023026WL
**body:**

Warning Letter involving FLORIDA GAS TRANSMISSION CO. PHMSA's enforcement data identifies the cited regulations as 191.23(a)(9),  192.917(b). The case was opened on 2023-05-08 and is reported as closed as of 2023-05-08. Open the official case record for notices, responses, orders, and the latest status.

Official case documents:

42023026WL_Warning Letter_05082023_(21-202528).pdf: https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-documents/42023026WL/42023026WL_Warning%20Letter_05082023_(21-202528).pdf

42023026WL_Warning Letter_05082023_(21-202528)_text.pdf: https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-documents/42023026WL/42023026WL_Warning%20Letter_05082023_(21-202528)_text.pdf

42023026WL_Warning Letter_05082023_(21-202528)_text.pdf

WARNING LETTER
VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL
May 8, 2023
Greg McIlwain
Executive Vice President, Operations
Energy Transfer Company
1300 Main Street
Houston, Texas 77002
CPF 4-2023-026-WL
Dear Mr. McIlwain:
From September 14 through 23, 2021, a representative of the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration (PHMSA), Office of Pipeline Safety, pursuant to Chapter 601 of 49 United
States Code (U.S.C.) inspected Florida Gas Transmission Co.’s (FGT) pipeline system in
Maitland, FL.
As a result of the inspection, it is alleged that you have committed probable violations of the
Pipeline Safety Regulations, Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). The items inspected
and the probable violations are:
1. § 191.23 Reporting safety-related conditions.
(a) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, each
operator shall report in accordance with § 191.25 the existence of any
of the following safety-related conditions involving facilities in service:
(1) . . . .
(9) Any safety-related condition that could lead to an imminent
hazard and causes (either directly or indirectly by remedial action of
the operator), for purposes other than abandonment, a 20% or more
reduction in operating pressure or shutdown of operation of a pipeline,
UNGSF, or an LNG facility that contains or processes gas or LNG.
FGT failed to report safety-related conditions (SRCs) that resulted in a pipeline shutdown in
accordance with § 191.23(a)(9). Specifically, FGT shut down its pipeline to repair conditions
meeting SRC criteria on FLMEA-21. FGT detected multiple anomalies on its Lake Worth
Electromagnetic Acoustic Transducer (EMAT) In-Line Inspection survey in April 2021 on
FLMEA-21, an 18-inch natural gas pipeline, that resulted in Failure Pressure Ratios significantly



below a safe operating pressure. FGT failed to report the conditions to PHMSA despite shutting
down the pipeline to repair conditions that met the SRC criteria.
2. § 192.917 How does an operator identify potential threats to pipeline integrity
and use the threat identification in its integrity program?
(a) . . . .
(b) Data gathering and integration. To identify and evaluate the
potential threats to a covered pipeline segment, an operator must
gather and integrate existing data and information on the entire
pipeline that could be relevant to the covered segment. In performing
this data gathering and integration, an operator must follow the
requirements in ASME/ANSI B31.8S, section 4. At a minimum, an
operator must gather and evaluate the set of data specified in Appendix
A to ASME/ANSI B31.8S, and consider both on the covered segment
and similar non-covered segments, past incident history, corrosion
control records, continuing surveillance records, patrolling records,
maintenance history, internal inspection records and all other
conditions specific to each pipeline
FGT failed to integrate existing data and information on the entire pipeline that could be relevant
to the covered segment in the threat identification in its integrity program in accordance with §
192.917(b). Specifically, FGT recorded both Sanford Lateral and Lake Worth Right Of Way
(ROW) Utility factors as 0 in its threat identification. However, Sanford Lateral shares ROW with
Duke Energy electricity lines overhead and Lake Worth shares ROW with a 24-inch Florida Gas-
owned line in parallel, so a more conservative selection for Utility factor should have been
recorded in the threat identification.
Under 49 U.S.C. § 60122 and 49 CFR § 190.223, you are subject to a civil penalty not to exceed
$257,664 per violation per day the violation persists, up to a maximum of $2,576,627 for a related
series of violations. For violation occurring on or after March 21, 2022 and before January 6,
2023, the maximum penalty may not exceed $239,142 per violation per day the violation persists,
up to a maximum of $2,391,142 for a related series of violations. For violation occurring on or
after May 3, 2021 and before March 21, 2022, the maximum penalty may not exceed $225,134
per violation per day the violation persists, up to a maximum of $2,251,334 for a related series of
violations. For violation occurring on or after January 11, 2021 and before May 3, 2021, the
maximum penalty may not exceed $222,504 per violation per day the violation persists, up to a
maximum of $2,225,034 for a related series of violations. For violation occurring on or after July
31, 2019 and before January 11, 2021, the maximum penalty may not exceed $218,647 per
violation per day the violation persists, up to a maximum of $2,186,465 for a related series of
violations. For violation occurring on or after November 27, 2018 and before July 31, 2019, the
maximum penalty may not exceed $213,268 per violation per day, with a maximum penalty not to
exceed $2,132,679. For violation occurring on or after November 2, 2015 and before November
27, 2018, the maximum penalty may not exceed $209,002 per violation per day, with a maximum
penalty not to exceed $2,090,022.



We have reviewed the circumstances and supporting documents involved in this case, and have
decided not to conduct additional enforcement action or penalty assessment proceedings at this
time. We advise you to correct the items identified in this letter. Failure to do so may result in
Florida Gas Transmission Co being subject to additional enforcement action.
No reply to this letter is required. If you choose to reply, in your correspondence please refer to
CPF 4-2023-026-WL. Be advised that all material you submit in response to this enforcement
action is subject to being made publicly available. If you believe that any portion of your
responsive material qualifies for confidential treatment under 5 U.S.C. § 552(b), along with the
complete original document you must provide a second copy of the document with the portions
you believe qualify for confidential treatment redacted and an explanation of why you believe the
redacted information qualifies for confidential treatment under 5 U.S.C. § 552(b).
Sincerely,
Bryan Lethcoe
Director, Southwest Region, Office of Pipeline Safety
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
- **truncated:** false
- **body characters:** 6898
