{"operation":"document","citation":"CPF 42024025NOPV","title":"ONEOK NGL PIPELINE, LLC — Notice of Probable Violation","source_type":"enforcement","agency":"Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration","status":"historical","official":true,"published_on":"2024-08-19","effective_on":null,"summary":"CLOSED notice of probable violation citing 195.401(b), 195.452(g)(1), 195.452(i)(1), 195.573(e), 195.589(c).","machine_formats":{"json":"https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-enforcement-42024025nopv.json","markdown":"https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-enforcement-42024025nopv.md"},"app_url":"https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-enforcement-42024025nopv","source_url":"https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-data/case/42024025NOPV","body":"Notice of Probable Violation involving ONEOK NGL PIPELINE, LLC. PHMSA's enforcement data identifies the cited regulations as 195.401(b),  195.452(g)(1),  195.452(i)(1),  195.573(e),  195.589(c). The case was opened on 2024-08-19 and is reported as closed as of 2025-11-25. Proposed civil penalty: $33,800. Assessed civil penalty: $31,400. Open the official case record for notices, responses, orders, and the latest status.\n\nOfficial case documents:\n\n42024025NOPV_Closure Letter_11252025_(23-266077).pdf: https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-documents/42024025NOPV/42024025NOPV_Closure%20Letter_11252025_(23-266077).pdf\n\n42024025NOPV_Closure Letter_11252025_(23-266077)_text.pdf: https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-documents/42024025NOPV/42024025NOPV_Closure%20Letter_11252025_(23-266077)_text.pdf\n\n42024025NOPV_Final Order_10152025_(23-266077).pdf: https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-documents/42024025NOPV/42024025NOPV_Final%20Order_10152025_(23-266077).pdf\n\n42024025NOPV_Final Order_10152025_(23-266077)_text.pdf: https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-documents/42024025NOPV/42024025NOPV_Final%20Order_10152025_(23-266077)_text.pdf\n\n42024025NOPV_Operator Response to Notice_09192024_(23-266077).pdf: https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-documents/42024025NOPV/42024025NOPV_Operator%20Response%20to%20Notice_09192024_(23-266077).pdf\n\n42024025NOPV_Operator Withdrawal of Hearing Request_12232024_(23-266077).pdf: https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-documents/42024025NOPV/42024025NOPV_Operator%20Withdrawal%20of%20Hearing%20Request_12232024_(23-266077).pdf\n\n42024025NOPV_PCO PCP_08192024_(23-266077).pdf: https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-documents/42024025NOPV/42024025NOPV_PCO%20PCP_08192024_(23-266077).pdf\n\n42024025NOPV_PCO PCP_08192024_(23-266077)_text.pdf: https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-documents/42024025NOPV/42024025NOPV_PCO%20PCP_08192024_(23-266077)_text.pdf\n\n42024025NOPV_PHC Hearing Scheduled_10172024_(23-266077).pdf: https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-documents/42024025NOPV/42024025NOPV_PHC%20Hearing%20Scheduled_10172024_(23-266077).pdf\n\n42024025NOPV_PHC Hearing Scheduled_10172024_(23-266077)_text.pdf: https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-documents/42024025NOPV/42024025NOPV_PHC%20Hearing%20Scheduled_10172024_(23-266077)_text.pdf\n\n42024025NOPV_Closure Letter_11252025_(23-266077)_text.pdf\n\nU.S. Department of Transportation\nPipeline and Hazardous Materials\nSafety Administration 8701 S. Gessner, Suite 630\nHouston TX 77074\nVIA ELECTRONIC MAIL TO: pierce.norton@oneok.com\nNovember 25, 2025\nPierce Norton\nPresident and Chief Executive Officer\nONEOK NGL Pipeline, LLC\n100 West Fifth Street\nTulsa, OK 74103\nCPF 4-2024-025-NOPV\nDear Mr. Norton:\nOn October 15, 2025, the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA)\nissued to ONEOK NGL Pipeline, LLC (ONEOK), a Final Order in the above-referenced case.\nThis Order included a Compliance Order and Civil Penalty assessment requirement to take\ncorrective actions on your pipeline. Based on our review of the documentation you provided and\nconfirmation of payment of the civil penalty, it has been determined that you have complied with\nthe terms of this Order.\nThis letter is to inform you that no further action is necessary, and this case is now closed. Thank\nyou for your cooperation.\nSincerely,\nBryan Lethcoe\nDirector, Southwest Region, Office of Pipeline Safety\nPipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration\ncc: Ryan Mccoy, Regulatory Compliance Manager, ONEOK NGL Pipeline, LLC,\nryan.mccoy@oneok.com\n\n42024025NOPV_Final Order_10152025_(23-266077)_text.pdf\n\nOctober 15, 2025\nVIA ELECTRONIC MAIL TO: pierce.norton@oneok.com\nPierce Norton\nPresident and Chief Executive Officer\nONEOK NGL Pipeline, LLC\n100 West Fifth Street\nTulsa, Oklahoma 74103\nRe: CPF No. 4-2024-025-NOPV\nDear Mr. Norton:\nEnclosed please find the Final Order issued in the above-referenced case. It withdraws one of the\nallegations of violation, makes other findings of violation, assesses a civil penalty of $31,400,\nand specifies actions that need to be taken by ONEOK NGL Pipeline, LLC to comply with the\npipeline safety regulations. The penalty payment terms are set forth in the Final Order. When the\ncivil penalty has been paid and the terms of the compliance order completed, as determined by\nthe Director, Southwest Region, this enforcement action will be closed. Service of the Final\nOrder by e-mail is effective upon the date of transmission and acknowledgement of receipt as\nprovided under 49 CFR § 190.5.\nThank you for your cooperation in this matter.\nSincerely,\nLinda Daugherty\nActing Associate Administrator\nfor Pipeline Safety\nEnclosure\ncc: Bryan Lethcoe, Director, Southwest Region, Office of Pipeline Safety, PHMSA\nRyan Mccoy, Regulatory Compliance Manager, ONEOK NGL Pipeline, LLC,\nryan.mccoy@oneok.com\n\n\n\nCONFIRMATION OF RECEIPT REQUESTED\n\n\n\nU.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION\nPIPELINE AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS SAFETY ADMINISTRATION\nOFFICE OF PIPELINE SAFETY\nWASHINGTON, D.C. 20590\n____________________________________\nIn the Matter of )\nONEOK NGL Pipeline, LLC, ) CPF No. 4-2024-025-NOPV\n)\n)\n)\nRespondent. )\n____________________________________)\nFINAL ORDER\nFrom March 20 through October 26, 2023, pursuant to 49 U.S.C. § 60117, a representative of the\nPipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA), Office of Pipeline Safety\n(OPS), conducted an on-site pipeline safety inspection of the facilities and records of ONEOK\nNGL Pipeline, LLC’s (ONEOK or Respondent) natural gas liquid (NGL) pipeline facilities in\nKansas, Oklahoma, and Texas.\nAs a result of the inspection, the Director, Southwest Region, OPS (Director), issued to\nRespondent, by letter dated August 19, 2024, a Notice of Probable Violation, Proposed Civil\nPenalty, and Proposed Compliance Order (Notice). In accordance with 49 CFR § 190.207, the\nNotice proposed finding that ONEOK had committed three violations of 49 CFR Part 195,\nproposed assessing a civil penalty of $33,800 for the alleged violations, and proposed ordering\nRespondent to take certain measures to correct the alleged violations. The Notice also included\none additional warning item pursuant to 49 CFR § 190.205, which warned Respondent to correct\nthe probable violation or face possible future enforcement action.\nONEOK responded to the Notice by letter dated September 19, 2024 (Response). ONEOK\ncontested several of the allegations and requested a hearing and informal consultation. The\nparties held a virtual informal consultation on November 4, 2024 and ONEOK subsequently\nprovided additional materials to support its Response. By letter dated December 23, 2024,\nRespondent withdrew its request for a hearing and thereby authorized the entry of this Final\nOrder without further notice.\nFINDINGS OF VIOLATION\nThe Notice alleged that Respondent violated 49 CFR Part 195, as follows:\n\n\n\nItem 1: The Notice alleged that Respondent violated 49 CFR § 195.452(g), which states:\n§ 195.452 Pipeline integrity management in high consequence areas.\n(a) . . . .\n(g) What is an information analysis? In periodically evaluating the\nintegrity of each pipeline segment (see paragraph (j) of this section), an\noperator must analyze all available information about the integrity of its\nentire pipeline and the consequences of a possible failure along the pipeline.\nOperators must continue to comply with the data integration elements\nspecified in § 195.452(g) that were in effect on October 1, 2018, until\nOctober 1, 2022. Operators must begin to integrate all the data elements\nspecified in this section starting October 1, 2020, with all attributes\nintegrated by October 1, 2022. This analysis must:\n(1) Integrate information and attributes about the pipeline that include,\nbut are not limited to:\nThe Notice alleged that Respondent violated 49 CFR § 195.452(g) by failing to analyze all\navailable information about the integrity of its entire pipeline and the consequences of a possible\nfailure along the pipeline. Specifically, the Notice alleged that ONEOK failed to integrate all the\ndata elements specified in this section (including: depth of cover surveys, results of examinations\nof exposed portions of buried pipelines, and location of casings and if shorted) starting October\n1, 2020, with all attributes integrated by October 1, 2022, for Hutch Reno Del to Hillside Booster\npipeline segment (Line ID 10374), located in Hutchinson, Kansas.\nIn its Response ONEOK contested Item 1, stating that its NGL Integrity Management Program,\nSection 6 (Risk Analysis) was completed in accordance with 49 CFR § 195.452(g), and that all\napplicable data integration elements are incorporated as variables in its risk model calculations.\nONEOK further explained that, under its Procedure 63 (Data Integration), risk model results are\nintegrated via Section 6 and reviewed as part of the SME Threat Category Evaluation Summary.\nONEOK stated that SME discussions of risk model results consider all integrated data elements,\nincluding those alleged to be missing from the analysis in the Notice. ONEOK stated that this\nmeans the Hutch Reno Del to Hillside Booster model results included depth of cover data, results\nof exposed portions of buried pipelines, and casing data (including shorted casings). ONEOK\nalso stated that under its NGL Risk Algorithm, these data integration elements are included in the\nFailure Likelihood Assessment, which evaluates susceptibility to failure from external corrosion\nand third-party damage.\nThe parties discussed Item 1 during the informal consultation on November 4, 2024. During the\nmeeting, ONEOK provided additional records clarifying that its risk algorithm included the data\nintegration elements at issue. On December 4 and December 19, 2024, ONEOK submitted\nadditional information showing that it had revised its procedures to clarify that its risk model and\nanalysis integrate all the data elements required by § 195.452(g).\nIn a recommendation for final action submitted pursuant to § 190.209(b)(7), the Director\nrecommended withdrawing the alleged violation of § 195.452(g). Based upon the foregoing, I\nhereby order that Item 1 be withdrawn.\n\n\n\nItem 2: The Notice alleged that Respondent violated 49 CFR § 195.452(i)(1), which states:\n§ 195.452 Pipeline integrity management in high consequence areas.\n(a) . . . .\n(i) What preventive and mitigative measures must an operator take to\nprotect the high consequence area? –\n(1) General requirements. An operator must take measures to prevent\nand mitigate the consequences of a pipeline failure that could affect a high\nconsequence area. These measures include conducting a risk analysis of the\npipeline segment to identify additional actions to enhance public safety or\nenvironmental protection. Such actions may include, but are not limited to,\nimplementing damage prevention best practices, better monitoring of\ncathodic protection where corrosion is a concern, establishing shorter\ninspection intervals, installing EFRDs on the pipeline segment, modifying\nthe systems that monitor pressure and detect leaks, providing additional\ntraining to personnel on response procedures, conducting drills with local\nemergency responders and adopting other management controls.\nThe Notice alleged that Respondent violated 49 CFR § 195.452(i)(1) by failing to take measures\nto prevent and mitigate the consequences of a pipeline failure that could affect a high\nconsequence area, including conducting a risk analysis of the pipeline segment to identify\nadditional actions to enhance public safety or environmental protection. Specifically, the Notice\nalleged that ONEOK’s risk analysis for its Bell Pump, Frost Pump, and Hutchinson Junction\nPump Stations included incorrect information regarding internal corrosion mitigation for\nfacilities located in a high consequence area.\nIn its Response, ONEOK did not contest Item 2 as it relates to the Hutchinson Pump Station.\nONEOK stated that it had updated the Facility Risk Model for the Hutchinson Pump Station to\nreflect that the evaluation questionnaire category for internal corrosion monitoring with coupon\nis answered “NO,” which aligns with the actual conditions at the facility.\nHowever, ONEOK contested Item 2 as it relates to the Bells and Frost Pump Stations. ONEOK\ncontended that the Facility Risk Models for both stations accurately reflect in the evaluation\nquestionnaire that the category for internal corrosion monitoring with coupon is answered “NO.”\nAccordingly, ONEOK requested that the Bells and Frost Pump Stations be removed from this\nallegation and that Item 2 be limited to the Hutchinson Pump Station.\nThe parties discussed this issue during the informal consultation on November 4, 2024, during\nwhich ONEOK provided additional records demonstrating that its Facility Risk Models for the\nBells and Frost Pump Stations reflected the internal corrosion monitoring category as “NO.” On\nDecember 31, 2024, ONEOK provided further information showing that its Facility Integrity\nDatabase had been updated to accurately reflect the value for internal coupon corrosion\nmonitoring for the Hutchinson Junction Pump Station.\nIn a recommendation for final action dated June 3, 2025, submitted pursuant to § 190.209(b)(7),\n\n\n\nthe Director recommended withdrawing the alleged violation of § 195.452(i)(1) as it relates to\nthe Bells and Frost Pump Stations.\nAccordingly, after considering all of the evidence, I find that Respondent violated 49 CFR\n§ 195.452(i)(1) for the Hutchinson Junction Pump Station by failing to take measures to prevent\nand mitigate the consequences of a pipeline failure that could affect a high consequence area,\nincluding conducting a risk analysis of the pipeline segment to identify additional actions to\nenhance public safety or environmental protection. Based upon the foregoing, Item 2 is\nwithdrawn as it relates to the Bells and Frost Pump Stations.\nItem 4: The Notice alleged that Respondent violated 49 CFR § 195.573(e), which states:\n§ 195.573 What must I do to monitor external corrosion control?\n(a) . . . .\n(e) Corrective action. You must correct any identified deficiency in\ncorrosion control as required by § 195.401(b). However, if the deficiency\ninvolves a pipeline in an integrity management program under § 195.452,\nyou must correct the deficiency as required by § 195.452(h).\n§ 195.401 General requirements.\n(a) . . . .\n(b) An operator must make repairs on its pipeline system according to\nthe following requirements:\n(1) Non Integrity management repairs. Whenever an operator discovers\nany condition that could adversely affect the safe operation of its pipeline\nsystem, it must correct the condition within a reasonable time. However, if\nthe condition is of such a nature that it presents an immediate hazard to\npersons or property, the operator may not operate the affected part of the\nsystem until it has corrected the unsafe condition.\nThe Notice alleged that Respondent violated 49 CFR § 195.573(e) by failing to correct any\nidentified deficiency in corrosion control as required by §§ 195.573(e) and 195.401(b).\nSpecifically, the Notice alleged that, ONEOK failed to correct low cathodic protection (CP)\npotential at the North Fence test point and Receiver trap test point at Warren Plant in Robert\nCounty, Texas, for two consecutive inspection cycles\nIn its Response, ONEOK, did not contest Item 4, the proposed penalty, or proposed corrective\nactions.\nAccordingly, after considering all of the evidence, I find that Respondent violated 49 CFR\n§ 195.573(e) by failing to correct any identified deficiency in corrosion control as required by\n§§ 195.573(e) and 195.401(b).\nThese findings of violation will be considered prior offenses in any subsequent enforcement\naction taken against Respondent.\n\n\n\nASSESSMENT OF PENALTY\nUnder 49 U.S.C. § 60122, Respondent is subject to an administrative civil penalty exceeding\n$200,000 per violation for each day of the violation, with a maximum administrative civil\npenalty exceeding $2,000,000 for any related series of violations.1\nIn determining the amount of a civil penalty under 49 U.S.C. § 60122 and 49 CFR § 190.225, I\nmust consider the following criteria: the nature, circumstances, and gravity of the violation,\nincluding adverse impact on the environment; the degree of Respondent’s culpability; the history\nof Respondent’s prior offenses; any effect that the penalty may have on its ability to continue\ndoing business; the good faith of Respondent in attempting to comply with the pipeline safety\nregulations; and self-disclosure or actions to correct a violation prior to discovery by PHMSA.\nIn addition, I may consider the economic benefit gained from the violation without any reduction\nbecause of subsequent damages, and such other matters as justice may require.\nThe Notice proposed a total civil penalty of $33,800 for the violation cited above. Effective May\n20, 2025, PHMSA revised its proposed civil penalty calculation policy to use the version of the\nCivil Penalty Worksheet in effect when the alleged violation occurred. The new policy reduces\nthe total proposed civil penalty in this case to $31,400.\nItem 4: The Notice proposed a civil penalty of $33,800 for Respondent’s violation of 49 CFR\n§ 195.573(e), for failing to correct any identified deficiency in corrosion control as required by\n§§ 195.573(e) and 195.401(b). The new policy for calculating a proposed civil penalty reduces\nthe proposed civil penalty for this item to $31,400. ONEOK neither contested the allegation nor\npresented any evidence or argument justifying a reduction of the proposed penalty. No\ninformation was presented indicating any of the statutory civil penalty assessment factors were\nincorrect or should be reduced. Therefore, I find no reason to further reduce the penalty.\nIn a recommendation for final action dated June 3, 2025, submitted pursuant to § 190.209(b)(7),\nthe Director recommended assessing the reduced civil penalty of $31,400. On June 5, 2025,\nONEOK submitted a letter agreeing with the reduced civil penalty.\nAccordingly, having reviewed the record and considered the assessment criteria, I assess\nRespondent a civil penalty of $31,400 for violation of 49 CFR § 195.573(e).\nPayment of the civil penalty must be made within 20 days after receipt of this Final Order.\nFederal regulations (49 C.F.R. § 89.21(b)(3)) require such payment to be made by wire transfer\nthrough the Federal Reserve Communications System (Fedwire), to the account of the U.S.\nTreasury. Detailed instructions are contained in the enclosure. Questions concerning wire\ntransfers should be directed to: Financial Operations Division (AMK-325), Federal Aviation\nAdministration, Mike Monroney Aeronautical Center, 6500 S MacArthur Blvd, Oklahoma City,\nOklahoma 79169. The Financial Operations Division telephone number is (405) 954-8845.\n1 These amounts are adjusted annually for inflation. See 49 CFR § 190.223 for adjusted amounts.\n\n\n\nFailure to pay the civil penalty will result in accrual of interest at the current annual rate in\naccordance with 31 U.S.C. § 3717, 31 CFR § 901.9 and 49 CFR § 89.23. Pursuant to those same\nauthorities, a late penalty charge of six percent (6%) per annum will be charged if payment is not\nmade within 110 days of service. Furthermore, failure to pay the civil penalty may result in\nreferral of the matter to the Attorney General for appropriate action in a district court of the\nUnited States.\nCOMPLIANCE ORDER\nThe Notice proposed a compliance order with respect to Items 1, 2, and 4 in the Notice for\nviolations of 49 CFR §§ 195.452(g), 195.452(i)(1), and 195.573(e), respectively. Under 49\nU.S.C. § 60118(a), each person who engages in the transportation of hazardous liquids or who\nowns or operates a pipeline facility is required to comply with the applicable safety standards\nestablished under chapter 601. As discussed above, Item 1 has been withdrawn. Therefore, the\ncompliance terms proposed in the Notice for that Item are not included in this Order. The\nDirector has indicated that Respondent has taken the following actions to address some of the\ncited violations:\nWith regard to the violation of § 195.452(i)(1) (Item 2), the Director has indicated\nthat ONEOK has satisfied the proposed compliance terms.\nAccordingly, I find that compliance has been achieved with respect this violation. Therefore, the\ncompliance terms proposed in the Notice for Item 2 are not included in this Order.\nAs for the remaining compliance terms, pursuant to the authority of 49 U.S.C. § 60118(b) and 49\nCFR § 190.217, Respondent is ordered to take the following actions to ensure compliance with\nthe pipeline safety regulations applicable to its operations:\n1. With respect to the violation of § 195.573(e) (Item 4), Respondent must\nprovide documentation that supports the adequacy and sufficiency of the new\ncathodic protection criteria of -100 mV applied for the North Fence test point and\nReceiver Trap test points at Warren Plant. These records must be provided to the\nDirector within 30 days of receipt of the Final Order.\nThe Director may grant an extension of time to comply with any of the required items upon a\nwritten request timely submitted by the Respondent and demonstrating good cause for an\nextension.\nPHMSA requests that Respondent maintain documentation of the safety improvement costs\nassociated with fulfilling this Compliance Order and submit the total to the Director. It is\nrequested that these costs be reported in two categories: (1) total cost associated with\npreparation/revision of plans, procedures, studies and analyses; and (2) total cost associated with\nreplacements, additions and other changes to pipeline infrastructure.\n\n\n\nFailure to comply with this Order may result in administrative assessment of civil penalties\nexceeding $200,000, as adjusted for inflation (see 49 CFR § 190.223 for adjusted amounts), for\neach violation for each day the violation continues or in referral to the Attorney General for\nappropriate relief in a district court of the United States.\nWARNING ITEM\nWith respect to Item 3, the Notice alleged a probable violation of Part 195, but identified it as a\nwarning item pursuant to § 190.205. The warning was for:\n49 CFR § 195.589(c) (Item 3) ─ Respondent’s alleged failure to maintain a\nrecord of each analysis, check, demonstration, examination, inspection,\ninvestigation, review, survey, and test required by Subpart H in sufficient detail to\ndemonstrate the adequacy of corrosion control measures or that corrosion\nrequiring control measures does not exist.\nIf OPS finds a violation of this provision in a subsequent inspection, Respondent may be subject\nto future enforcement action.\nUnder 49 CFR § 190.243, Respondent may submit a Petition for Reconsideration of this Final\nOrder to the Associate Administrator, Office of Pipeline Safety, PHMSA, 1200 New Jersey\nAvenue, SE, East Building, 2nd Floor, Washington, DC 20590, with a copy sent to the Office of\nChief Counsel, PHMSA, at the same address. The written petition must be received no later than\n20 days after receipt of the Final Order by Respondent. Any petition submitted must contain a\nstatement of the issue(s) and meet all other requirements of 49 CFR § 190.243. The filing of a\npetition automatically stays the payment of any civil penalty assessed. The other terms of the\norder, including corrective action, remain in effect unless the Associate Administrator, upon\nrequest, grants a stay. The terms and conditions of this Final Order are effective upon service in\naccordance with 49 CFR § 190.5.\n___________________________________ __________________________\nLinda Daugherty Date Issued\nActing Associate Administrator\nfor Pipeline Safety\n\n42024025NOPV_PHC Hearing Scheduled_10172024_(23-266077)_text.pdf\n\nOctober 17, 2024\nVIA ELECTRONIC MAIL TO: danny.scroggins@oneok.com and bryan.lethcoe@dot.gov\nMr. Danny Scroggins\nLegal Counsel\nONEOK, Inc.\n100 West Fifth Street\nTulsa, OK 74103\nMr. Bryan Lethcoe\nDirector, Southwest Region\nPipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration\n8701 South Gessner Road\nSuite 630\nHouston, Texas 77074\nRe: Notice of Hearing, ONEOK NGL Pipeline, LLC\nCPF No. 4-2024-025-NOPV\nDear Mr. Scroggins and Mr. Lethcoe:\nIn accordance with 49 C.F.R. § 190.211, an informal hearing will be held regarding the Notice of\nProbable Violation, Proposed Civil Penalty, and Proposed Compliance Order issued by the\nPipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration in the above-referenced case. The\nhearing will take place on April 10, 2025, beginning at 8:30 a.m. Central Time.\nThe hearing will take place at the PHMSA Southwest Region office, 8701 South Gessner Road,\nSuite 630, Houston, TX 77074. Upon arrival at the building, attendees will be required to\npresent photo identification to security personnel. A contact phone number for the day of the\nhearing is (713) 272-2859.\nAt least 10 calendar days prior to the hearing (or by March 31, 2025), both parties must submit\nand exchange any additional written materials they intend to present at the hearing and the name\nand email address of each attendee. This information should be provided electronically.\nMaterials not submitted by this date may be excluded. If you have any questions, please do not\nhesitate to contact me.\n\n\n\nSincerely,\nLarry White\nPresiding Official\ncc: Mr. Jason Smith, Vice President Asset Integrity, ONEOK NGL Pipeline, LLC,\njason.a.smith@oneok.com\nMr. Timothy O’Shea, OPS Southwest Region Counsel, PHMSA,\ntimothy.o’shea@dot.gov\nMs. Kelsey Gagnon, OPS Southwest Region Counsel, PHMSA,\nkelsey.gagnon@dot.gov","truncated":false,"body_characters":25545}