# AIRCRAFT SERVICES INTERNATIONAL GROUP (ASIG) — Notice of Amendment - **operation:** document - **citation:** CPF 520085009M - **title:** AIRCRAFT SERVICES INTERNATIONAL GROUP (ASIG) — Notice of Amendment - **source type:** enforcement - **agency:** Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration - **status:** historical - **official:** true - **published on:** 2008-04-23 - **effective on:** Not available - **summary:** CLOSED notice of amendment citing 195.452(f)(7), 195.452(i)(2), 195.452(i)(3), 195.452(i)(4), 195.452(j)(2), 195.452(j)(4)(i). - **machine formats:** - **json:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-enforcement-520085009m.json - **markdown:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-enforcement-520085009m.md - **app url:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-enforcement-520085009m - **source url:** https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-data/case/520085009M **body:** Notice of Amendment involving AIRCRAFT SERVICES INTERNATIONAL GROUP (ASIG). PHMSA's enforcement data identifies the cited regulations as 195.452(f)(7), 195.452(i)(2), 195.452(i)(3), 195.452(i)(4), 195.452(j)(2), 195.452(j)(4)(i). The case was opened on 2008-04-23 and is reported as closed as of 2008-08-21. Open the official case record for notices, responses, orders, and the latest status. Official case documents: 520085009M_notice of amendment_04232008.pdf: https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-documents/520085009M/520085009M_notice%20of%20amendment_04232008.pdf 520085009m_notice of amendment_04232008_text.pdf: https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-documents/520085009M/520085009m_notice%20of%20amendment_04232008_text.pdf 520085009M_operator response_05202008.pdf: https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-documents/520085009M/520085009M_operator%20response_05202008.pdf 520085009m_notice of amendment_04232008_text.pdf O U. S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration 12300 W Dakota Ave, Suite 110 Lakewood, CO 80228 NOTICE OF AMENDMENT CERTIFIED MAIL - RETURN RECEIPT RE UESTED April 23, 2008 Mr. Thomas Mushovic General Manager Aircraft Services International Group (ASIG) 6000 DeHavilland Drive Anchorage, AK 99519 CPF 5-2008-5009M Dear Mr Mushovic Between November 11-14, 2007, a representative of the Pipehne and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA), pursuant to Chapter 601 of 49 United States Code, mspected ASIG's records and procedures for its Integrity Management program m Anchorage, Alaska. On the basis of the mspection, PHMSA has identified apparent inadequacies found within ASIGs' plans or procedures, as described below. Preventative and Mitigative Measures $195. 452 Pipeline integrity management in high consequence areas. (i) What preventive and mitigative measures must an operator take to protect the high consequence area? (2) Risk analysis criteria. In identifying the need for additional preventive and mitigative measures, an operator must evaluate the likelihood of a pipeline release occurring and how a release could affect the high consequence area. This determination must consider all relevant risk factors, including, but not limited to: (i) Terrain surrounding the pipeline segment, including drainage systems such as small streams and other smaller waterways that could act as a conduit to the high consequence area; (ii) Elevation profile; (iii) Characteristics of the product transported; (iv) Amount of product that could be released; (v) Possibility of a spillage in a farm field following the drain tile into a waterway; (vi) Ditches along side a roadway the pipeline crosses; (vii) Physical support of the pipeline segment such as by a cable suspension bridge; (viii) Exposure of the pipeline to operating pressure exceeding established maximum operating pressure. ~ Item 1A: )194 452 (i)(2) ASIG did not have adequate procedures that considers the items m )195 452 (i) (2) ASIG must consider all risk factors, mcludmg, but not hmited to. (i) Terram surroundmg the pipehne segment, mcluding drainage systems such as small streams and other smaller waterways that could act as a conduit to the high consequence area, (n) Elevation profile, (ni) Characteristics of the product transported, (iv) Amount of product that could be released, (v) Possibihty of a spillage m a farm field followmg the drain tile mto a waterway; (vi) Ditches along side a roadway the pipehne crosses, (vii) Physical support of the pipehne segment such as by a cable suspension bridge, (viii) Exposure of the pipehne to operatmg pressure exceeding estabhshed maximum operatmg pressure Preventative and Mitigative Measures $195. 452 Pipeline integrity management in high consequence areas. (i) What preventive and mitigative measures must an operator take to protect the high consequence area? 3) Leak detection. An operator must have a means to detect leaks on its pipeline system. An operator must evaluate the capability of its leak detection means and modify, as necessary, to protect the high consequence area. An operator's evaluation must, at least, consider, the following factors — length and size of the pipeline, type of product carried, the pipeline's proximity to the high consequence area, the swiftness of leak detection, location of nearest response personnel, leak history, and risk assessment results. ~ Item 1A: )194. 452 (i)(3) ASIG did not have adequate procedures to take mto account the factors outlmed m (195 452(1)(3) ASIG did not conduct a formal analysis to assess the capabihty of its leak detection means and modify, as necessary, to protect the high consequence area An operator's evaluation must, at least, consider the followmg factors-length and size of the pipehne, type of product carried, the pipehne's proximity to high consequence area, the saltiness ot Leak d, elect~on, locabm, oft eMest response pcrsonneY, leak r. story, +~6 risk assessment resuhs. Preventative and Mitigative Measures $195. 452 Pipeline integrity management in high consequence areas. (i) What preventive and mitigative measures must an operator take to protect the high consequence area? (4) Emergency Flow Restricting Devices (EFRD). If an operator determines that an EFRD is needed on a pipeline segment to protect a high consequence area in the event of a hazardous liquid pipeline release, an operator must install the EFRD. In making this determination, an operator must, at least, consider the following factors — the swiftness of leak detection and pipeline shutdown capabilities, the type of commodity carried, the rate of potential leakage, the volume that can be released, topography or pipeline profile, the potential for ignition, proximity to power sources, location of nearest response personnel, specific terrain between the pipeline segment and the high consequence area, and benefits expected by reducing the spill size. ~ Item 1A: )194. 452 (i)(4) ASIG procedures did not consider all of the factors outhned m 452 (i) (4) ASIG did not complete an evaluation of the need for additional EFRDs to respond to releases during transient conditions. ASIG did not consider the potential effects of additional EFRDs, mcluding a) conductmg proper valve sequencmg during mtended EFRD activations, b) the operator's ability to promptly detect and react to madvertent EFRD activations, and c) possible elevated pressures caused by transient conditions during EFRD activations Preventative and Mitigative Measures $195. 452 Pipeline integrity management in high consequence areas. (j) What is a continual process of evaluation and assessment to maintain a pipeline's integrity? (2) Evaluation. An operator must conduct a periodic evaluation as frequently as needed to assure pipeline integrity. An operator must base the frequency of evaluation on risk factors specific to its pipeline, including the factors specified in paragraph (e) of this section. The evaluation must consider the results of the baseline and periodic integrity assessments, information analysis (paragraph (g) of this section), and decisions about remediation, and preventive and mitigative actions (paragraphs (h) and (i) of this section). ~ Item 1A: )194. 452 (l)(2) ASIG did not have adequate procedures to identify contmual processes and procedures that meet the requirements of )195 452 (l) (2). All relevant mformation was not adequately considered and adequate justifications were not developed for reassessment mtervals 5. Preventative and Mitigative Measures $195. 452 Pipeline integrity management in high consequence areas. (j) What is a continual process of evaluation and assessment to maintain a pipeline's integrity? (4) Variance from the 5-year intervals in limited situations- (i) Engineering basis. An operator may be able to justify an engineering basis for a longer assessment interval on a segment of line pipe. The justification must be supported by a reliable engineering evaluation combined with the use of other technology, such as external monitoring technology, that provides an understanding of the condition of the line pipe equivalent to that which can be obtained from the assessment methods allowed in paragraph (j)(5) of this section. An operator must notify OPS 270 days before the end of the five-year (or less) interval of the justification for a longer interval, and propose an alternative interval. An operator must send the notice to the address specified in paragraph (m) of this section. (ii) Unavailable technology. An operator may require a longer assessment period for a segment of line pipe (for example, because sophisticated internal inspection technology is not available). An operator must justify the reasons why it cannot comply with the required assessment period and must also demonstrate the actions it is taking to evaluate the integrity of the pipeline segment in the interim. An operator must notify OPS 180 days before the end of the five-year (or less) interval that the operator may require a longer assessment interval, and provide an estimate of when the assessment can be completed. An operator must send a notice to the address specified in paragraph (m) of this section. ~ Item 1A: (194. 452 (l)(4) ASIG does not have adequate procedures in their IM Program to include provisions for submitting variance notifications to PHMSA for assessment mtervals longer than the 5- year maximum assessment interval~ Program Evaluation (f) What are the elements of an integrity management program? An integrity management program begins with the initial framework. An operator must continually change the program to reflect operating experience, conclusions drawn from results of the integrity assessments, and other maintenance and surveillance data, and evaluation of consequences of a failure on the high consequence area. An operator must include, at minimum, each of the following elements in its written integrity management program: (7) Methods to measure the program's effectiveness (see paragraph (k) of this section); ~ Item 1A: )194. 452 (f)(7) ASIG does not have adequate procedures to demonstrate that they have an effective root cause analysis and a lessons learned program. Res onse to this Notice This Notice is provided pursuant to 49 U S. C ) 60108(a) and 49 C F R. ( 190 237 Enclosed as part of this Notice is a document entitled Response Options for Pipeline Operators in Compliance Proceedings Please refer to this document and note the response options. Be advised that all material you submit in response to this enforcement action is subJect to being made pubhcly available If you beheve that any portion of your responsive material quahfies for confidential treatment under 5 U S. C 552(b), along with the complete origmal document you must provide a second copy of the document with the portions you believe quahfy for confidential treatment redacted and an explanation of why you beheve the redacted mformation quahfies for confidential treatment under 5 U. S. C. 552(b). If you do not respond within 30 days of receipt of this Notice, this constitutes a waiver of your right to contest the allegations m this Notice and authorizes the Associate Admmistrator for Pipelme Safety to find facts as alleged in this Notice without further notice to you and to issue a Fmal Order If, after opportumty for a hearing, your plans or procedures are found madequate as alleged in this Notice, you may be ordered to amend your plans or procedures to correct the inadequacies (49 C F. R. ) 190. 237). If you are not contesting this Notice, we propose that you submit your amended procedures to my office withm 30 days of receipt of this Notice This period may be extended by written request for good cause Once the madequacies identified herem have been addressed m your amended procedures, this enforcement action will be closed In correspondence concerning this matter, please refer to CPF 5-2008-5009M and, for each document you submit, please provide a copy m electronic format whenever possible Smcerely, Chris Hoidal Director, Western Region Pipehne and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration cc PHP-60 Comphance Registry PHP-500 J Strawn (4119912) Enclosure Response Options for Pipeline Operators in Compliance Proceedings - **truncated:** false - **body characters:** 12294