# HECO - HAWAIIAN ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC. — Notice of Amendment - **operation:** document - **citation:** CPF 520095010M - **title:** HECO - HAWAIIAN ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC. — Notice of Amendment - **source type:** enforcement - **agency:** Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration - **status:** historical - **official:** true - **published on:** 2009-02-19 - **effective on:** Not available - **summary:** CLOSED notice of amendment citing 195.452(f)(3), 195.452(f)(8), 195.452(i)(1). - **machine formats:** - **json:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-enforcement-520095010m.json - **markdown:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-enforcement-520095010m.md - **app url:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-enforcement-520095010m - **source url:** https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-data/case/520095010M **body:** Notice of Amendment involving HECO - HAWAIIAN ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC.. PHMSA's enforcement data identifies the cited regulations as 195.452(f)(3), 195.452(f)(8), 195.452(i)(1). The case was opened on 2009-02-19 and is reported as closed as of 2009-04-14. Open the official case record for notices, responses, orders, and the latest status. Official case documents: 520095010M_notice of amendment_02192009.pdf: https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-documents/520095010M/520095010M_notice%20of%20amendment_02192009.pdf 520095010M_notice of amendment_02192009_text.pdf: https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-documents/520095010M/520095010M_notice%20of%20amendment_02192009_text.pdf 520095010M_operator response_03202009.pdf: https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-documents/520095010M/520095010M_operator%20response_03202009.pdf 520095010M_notice of amendment_02192009_text.pdf NOTICE OF AMENDMENT CERTIFIED MAIL - RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED February 19, 2009 Mr. Thomas Simmons Vice President Hawaiian Electric Company, Inc. P.O. Box 2750 Honolulu, HI 96840-0001 CPF 5-2009-5010M Dear Mr. Simmons: On May 29-30, 2008, a representative of the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA), pursuant to Chapter 601 of 49 United States Code, inspected the Hawaiian Electric Company’s (HECO) procedures for their Integrity Management Program (IMP) in Honolulu, Hawaii. On the basis of the inspection, PHMSA has identified the apparent inadequacies found within HECO’s plans or procedures, as described below: 1. §195.452 Pipeline integrity management in high consequence areas. (f) What are the elements of an integrity management program? An integrity management program begins with the initial framework. An operator must continually change the program to reflect operating experience, conclusions drawn from results of the integrity assessments, and other maintenance and surveillance data, and evaluation of consequences of a failure on the high consequence area. An operator must include, at minimum, each of the following elements in its written integrity management program: (8) A process for review of integrity assessment results and information analysis by a person qualified to evaluate the results and information (see paragraph (h) (2) of this section). The HECO procedures do not ensure the IMP reviewers and evaluators are qualified. The procedures currently require the documentation of their IMP team members; however, the procedures do not specify the level of qualifications the IMP reviewers must have to adequately review and analyze the assessment results. 2. §195.452 Pipeline integrity management in high consequence areas. (f) What are the elements of an integrity management program? An integrity management program begins with the initial framework. An operator must continually change the program to reflect operating experience, conclusions drawn from results of the integrity assessments, and other maintenance and surveillance data, and evaluation of consequences of a failure on the high consequence area. An operator must include, at minimum, each of the following elements in its written integrity management program: (3) An analysis that integrates all available information about the integrity of the entire pipeline and the consequences of a failure (see paragraph (g) of this section); (g) What is an information analysis? In periodically evaluating the integrity of each pipeline segment (paragraph (j) of this section), an operator must analyze all available information about the integrity of the entire pipeline and the consequences of a failure. This information includes: (1) Information critical to determining the potential for, and preventing, damage due to excavation, including current and planned damage prevention activities, and development or planned development along the pipeline segment; (2) Data gathered through the integrity assessment required under this section; (3) Data gathered in conjunction with other inspections, tests, surveillance and patrols required by this Part, including, corrosion control monitoring and cathodic protection surveys; and (4) Information about how a failure would affect the high consequence area, such as location of the water intake. The HECO procedures are inadequate for considering the risks associated with their pipeline facility beyond just line pipe. The facility risk needs to define how equipment such as pumps, valves, and gaskets is addressed via the risk analysis and P&MM processes. 3. §195.452 Pipeline integrity management in high consequence areas. (i) What preventive and mitigative measures must an operator take to protect the high consequence area? (1) An operator must take prompt action to address all anomalous conditions the operator discovers through the integrity assessment or information analysis. In addressing all conditions, an operator must evaluate all anomalous conditions and remediate those that could reduce a pipeline's integrity. An operator must be able to demonstrate that the remediation of the condition will ensure the condition is unlikely to pose a threat to the long-term integrity of the pipeline. An operator must comply with § 195.422 when making a repair. 2 (i) Temporary pressure reduction. An operator must notify PHMSA, in accordance with paragraph (m) of this section, if the operator cannot meet the schedule for evaluation and remediation required under paragraph (h)(3) of this section and cannot provide safety through a temporary reduction in operating pressure. (ii) Long-term pressure reduction. When a pressure reduction exceeds 365 days, the operator must notify PHMSA in accordance with paragraph (m) of this section and explain the reasons for the delay. An operator must also take further remedial action to ensure the safety of the pipeline. (2) Risk analysis criteria. In identifying the need for additional preventive and mitigative measures, an operator must evaluate the likelihood of a pipeline release occurring and how a release could affect the high consequence area. This determination must consider all relevant risk factors, including, but not limited to: (i) Terrain surrounding the pipeline segment, including drainage systems such as small streams and other smaller waterways that could act as a conduit to the high consequence area; (ii) Elevation profile; (iii) Characteristics of the product transported; (iv) Amount of product that could be released; (v) Possibility of a spillage in a farm field following the drain tile into a waterway; (vi) Ditches along side a roadway the pipeline crosses; (vii) Physical support of the pipeline segment such as by a cable suspension bridge; (viii) Exposure of the pipeline to operating pressure exceeding established maximum operating pressure. (3) Leak detection. An operator must have a means to detect leaks on its pipeline system. An operator must evaluate the capability of its leak detection means and modify, as necessary, to protect the high consequence area. An operator's evaluation must, at least, consider, the following factors–length and size of the pipeline, type of product carried, the pipeline's proximity to the high consequence area, the swiftness of leak detection, location of nearest response personnel, leak history, and risk assessment results. (4) Emergency Flow Restricting Devices (EFRD). If an operator determines that an EFRD is needed on a pipeline segment to protect a high consequence area in the event of a hazardous liquid pipeline release, an operator must install the EFRD. In making this determination, an operator must, at least, consider the following factors–the swiftness of leak detection and pipeline shutdown capabilities, the type of commodity carried, the rate of potential leakage, the volume that can be released, topography or pipeline profile, the potential for ignition, proximity to power sources, location of nearest response personnel, specific terrain between the pipeline segment and the high consequence area, and benefits expected by reducing the spill size. The HECO procedures are inadequate for defining and ranking Preventive and 3 Mitigative Measures (P&MM) of their facility. This is important to ensure future P&MM decisions are made in a consistent and risk based manner. Response to this Notice This Notice is provided pursuant to 49 U.S.C. § 60108(a) and 49 C.F.R. § 190.237. Enclosed as part of this Notice is a document entitled Response Options for Pipeline Operators in Compliance Proceedings. Please refer to this document and note the response options. Be advised that all material you submit in response to this enforcement action is subject to being made publicly available. If you believe that any portion of your responsive material qualifies for confidential treatment under 5 U.S.C. 552(b), along with the complete original document you must provide a second copy of the document with the portions you believe qualify for confidential treatment redacted and an explanation of why you believe the redacted information qualifies for confidential treatment under 5 U.S.C. 552(b). If you do not respond within 30 days of receipt of this Notice, this constitutes a waiver of your right to contest the allegations in this Notice and authorizes the Associate Administrator for Pipeline Safety to find facts as alleged in this Notice without further notice to you and to issue a Final Order. If, after opportunity for a hearing, your plans or procedures are found inadequate as alleged in this Notice, you may be ordered to amend your plans or procedures to correct the inadequacies (49 C.F.R. § 190.237). If you are not contesting this Notice, we propose that you submit your amended procedures to my office within 30 days of receipt of this Notice. This period may be extended by written request for good cause. Once the inadequacies identified herein have been addressed in your amended procedures, this enforcement action will be closed. In correspondence concerning this matter, please refer to CPF 5-2009-5010M and, for each document you submit, please provide a copy in electronic format whenever possible. Sincerely, Chris Hoidal Director, Western Region Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration cc: PHP-60 Compliance Registry PHP-500 H. Nguyen (#121974) Enclosure: Response Options for Pipeline Operators in Compliance Proceedings 4 - **truncated:** false - **body characters:** 10379