# EL PASO NATURAL GAS CO — Warning Letter

- **operation:** document
- **citation:** CPF 520171002W
- **title:** EL PASO NATURAL GAS CO — Warning Letter
- **source type:** enforcement
- **agency:** Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
- **status:** historical
- **official:** true
- **published on:** 2017-02-24
- **effective on:** Not available
- **summary:** CLOSED warning letter citing 192.739(a).
- **machine formats:** - **json:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-enforcement-520171002w.json
- **markdown:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-enforcement-520171002w.md
- **app url:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-enforcement-520171002w
- **source url:** https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-data/case/520171002W
**body:**

Warning Letter involving EL PASO NATURAL GAS CO. PHMSA's enforcement data identifies the cited regulation as 192.739(a). The case was opened on 2017-02-24 and is reported as closed as of 2017-02-24. Open the official case record for notices, responses, orders, and the latest status.

Official case documents:

520171002W_Operator Response to Notice_04102017.pdf: https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-documents/520171002W/520171002W_Operator%20Response%20to%20Notice_04102017.pdf

520171002W_Warning Letter_02242017.pdf: https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-documents/520171002W/520171002W_Warning%20Letter_02242017.pdf

520171002W_Warning Letter_02242017_text.pdf: https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-documents/520171002W/520171002W_Warning%20Letter_02242017_text.pdf

520171002W_Warning Letter_02242017_text.pdf

WARNING LETTER
CERTIFIED MAIL - RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
February 24, 2017
Mr. Gary Buchler
Vice President
El Paso Natural Gas Company
1001 Louisiana Street
Houston, TX 77002-5089
CPF 5-2017-1002W
Dear Mr. Buchler:
On March 29-31, 2016, June 14-16, 2016, August 29-September 2, 2016, September 26-30, 2016,
October 3-7, 2016, and on November 29, 2016, a representative of the Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA), pursuant to Chapter 601 of 49 United States Code,
inspected El Paso Natural Gas Company’s (EPNG) gas transmission pipeline system located in
Ehrenberg, Phoenix and surrounding areas in Arizona.
As a result of the inspection, it is alleged that you have committed a probable violation of the Pipeline
Safety Regulations, Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations. The item inspected and the probable
violation is:
1. §192.739 Pressure limiting and regulating stations: Inspection and testing.
(a) Each pressure limiting station, relief device (except rupture discs), and
pressure regulating station and its equipment must be subjected at intervals
not exceeding 15 months, but at least once each calendar year, to inspections
and tests to determine that it is—
(1) In good mechanical condition;
(2) Adequate from the standpoint of capacity and reliability of operation for
the service in which it is employed;



(3) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, set to control or
relieve at the correct pressure consistent with the pressure limits of
§192.201(a); and
(4) Properly installed and protected from dirt, liquids, or other conditions
that might prevent proper operation.
EPNG did not conduct inspections and tests of each pressure limiting station, relief device (except
rupture discs), and pressure regulating station and its equipment at intervals not exceeding 15 months,
but at least once each calendar year.
EPNG failed to conduct an inspection and test of St. Johns Mission regulator station on main line
numbered 1124 within the 15-month interval. In 2014, EPNG performed an inspection of St. Johns
Mission station on 08/30/2014. Then, the following year in 2015, EPNG inspected St. Johns Mission
station on 12/04/2015. This inspection exceeds the 15-month interval.
Under 49 United States Code, § 60122, you are subject to a civil penalty not to exceed $205,638 per
violation per day the violation persists up to a maximum of $2,056,380 for a related series of
violations. For violation occurring between January 4, 2012 to August 1, 2016, the maximum penalty
may not exceed $200,000 per violation per day, with a maximum penalty not to exceed $2,000,000 for
a related series of violations. For violations occurring prior to January 4, 2012, the maximum penalty
may not exceed $100,000 per violation per day, with a maximum penalty not to exceed $1,000,000 for
a related series of violations. We have reviewed the circumstances and supporting documents
involved in this case, and have decided not to conduct additional enforcement action or penalty
assessment proceedings at this time. We advise you to correct the item identified in this letter. Failure
to do so will result in EPNG being subject to additional enforcement action.
No reply to this letter is required. If you choose to reply, in your correspondence please refer to CPF
5-2017-1002W. Be advised that all material you submit in response to this enforcement action is
subject to being made publicly available. If you believe that any portion of your responsive material
qualifies for confidential treatment under 5 U.S.C. 552(b), along with the complete original document
you must provide a second copy of the document with the portions you believe qualify for confidential
treatment redacted and an explanation of why you believe the redacted information qualifies for
confidential treatment under 5 U.S.C. 552(b).
Sincerely,
Chris Hoidal
Director, Western Region
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
cc: PHP-60 Compliance Registry
PHP-500 C. Ishikawa (Unit 15164 Phoenix Complex/#152215)
- **truncated:** false
- **body characters:** 4861
