# DCOR, LLC — Notice of Amendment

- **operation:** document
- **citation:** CPF 520207001M
- **title:** DCOR, LLC — Notice of Amendment
- **source type:** enforcement
- **agency:** Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
- **status:** historical
- **official:** true
- **published on:** 2020-02-03
- **effective on:** Not available
- **summary:** CLOSED notice of amendment citing 195.452(f)(3), 195.452(j)(2).
- **machine formats:** - **json:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-enforcement-520207001m.json
- **markdown:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-enforcement-520207001m.md
- **app url:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-enforcement-520207001m
- **source url:** https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-data/case/520207001M
**body:**

Notice of Amendment involving DCOR, LLC. PHMSA's enforcement data identifies the cited regulations as 195.452(f)(3),  195.452(j)(2). The case was opened on 2020-02-03 and is reported as closed as of 2020-04-02. Open the official case record for notices, responses, orders, and the latest status.

Official case documents:

520207001M_Closure Letter_04022020.pdf: https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-documents/520207001M/520207001M_Closure%20Letter_04022020.pdf

520207001M_Closure Letter_04022020_text.pdf: https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-documents/520207001M/520207001M_Closure%20Letter_04022020_text.pdf

520207001M_Notice of Amendment_02032020.pdf: https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-documents/520207001M/520207001M_Notice%20of%20Amendment_02032020.pdf

520207001M_Notice of Amendment_02032020_text.pdf: https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-documents/520207001M/520207001M_Notice%20of%20Amendment_02032020_text.pdf

520207001M_Operator Response to Notice_03132020.pdf: https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-documents/520207001M/520207001M_Operator%20Response%20to%20Notice_03132020.pdf

520207001M_Closure Letter_04022020_text.pdf

VIA E-MAIL TO MR. ROBERT L. GARCIA
April 2, 2020
Mr. Robert L. Garcia
Vice-President, Facilities & Process Engineering
DCOR, LLC
290 Maple Court, Suite 290
Ventura, CA 93003-3517
CPF 5-2020-7001M
Closure Letter
Dear Mr. Garcia:
From August 26 through 28, 2019, a representative of the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety
Administration (PHMSA), pursuant to Chapter 601 of 49 United States Code, inspected and reviewed
DCOR LLC’s (DCOR) procedures for the crude oil transmission pipeline system that serves your
offshore Platform A and the Rincon Onshore Separation Facility (RSOF) in Ventura, California. As a
result of the inspection, DCOR was issued a Notice of Amendment on February 3, 2020, which proposed
amendment of your procedures.
DCOR submitted its amended procedures on March 13, 2020. My staff reviewed the amended
procedures, and it appears that the inadequacies outlined in this Notice of Amendment have been
corrected.
This letter is to inform you no further action is necessary and this case is now closed. Thank you for your
cooperation.
Sincerely,
Dustin Hubbard
Director, Western Region
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
cc: PHP-60 Compliance Registry
PHP-500 N. Cruz (#166309)

520207001M_Notice of Amendment_02032020_text.pdf

NOTICE OF AMENDMENT
CERTIFIED MAIL - RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
February 3, 2020
Mr. Andrew Prestridge
President
DCOR LLC
290 Maple Court, Suite 290
Ventura, CA 93003
CPF 5-2020-7001M
Dear Mr. Prestridge:
On August 26 through 28, 2019, a representative of the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration (PHMSA), pursuant to Chapter 601 of 49 United States Code, inspected
and reviewed DCOR LLC’s (DCOR) procedures for the crude oil transmission pipeline system
that serves your offshore Platform A and the Rincon Onshore Separation Facility (ROSF) in
Ventura, California.
On the basis of the inspection, PHMSA has identified the apparent inadequacies found within
DCOR’s plans or procedures, as described below:
1. § 195.452 Pipeline integrity management in high consequence areas.
(a) . . .
(f) What are the elements of an integrity management program? An integrity
management program begins with the initial framework. An operator must
continually change the program to reflect operating experience, conclusions
drawn from results of the integrity assessments, and other maintenance and
surveillance data, and evaluation of consequences of a failure on the high



consequence area. An operator must include, at minimum, each of the following
elements in its written integrity management program:
(1) . . .
(3) An analysis that integrates all available information about the integrity of the
entire pipeline and the consequences of a failure (see paragraph (g) of this
section); …
DCOR’s written integrity management program (IMP-HL Section 6) failed to include written
procedures for an analysis that integrates all available information about the integrity of the
entire pipeline and the consequences of a failure that includes all the information set forth in
§195.452(g).1 Specifically, Section 6.2 of DCOR’s IMP only notes that data must be current
and accurate, but fails to specifically describe what this data should consist of (e.g., ILI
assessments, cathodic protection surveys, etc.) and how it is integrated in its risk analysis.2
2. § 195.452 Pipeline integrity management in high consequence areas.
(a) …
(j) What is a continual process of evaluation and assessment to maintain a
pipeline’s integrity?
(1) …
(2) Evaluation. An operator must conduct a periodic evaluation as frequently as
needed to assure pipeline integrity. An operator must base the frequency of
evaluation on risk factors specific to its pipeline, including the factors specified in
paragraph (e) of this section. The evaluation must consider the results of the
baseline and periodic integrity assessments, information analysis (paragraph (g)
of this section), and decisions about remediation, and preventive and mitigative
actions (paragraphs (h) and (i) of this section).
DCOR’s written integrity management program (IMP-HL Section 6) did not have adequate
written procedures for conducting a periodic evaluation, as frequently as needed, to assure
pipeline integrity. Specifically, DCOR failed to specify the frequency of evaluation based on
risk factors specific to its pipeline. Instead, Section 6.2 of its IMP states that the “risk analysis
will be updated when information on these dominant risk factors changes significantly.” Not
only is the periodic evaluation interval undefined, but DCOR’s IMP does not clarify what
dominant risk factors are, or what a significant change to them might be.
1 49 C.F.R. §195.452(g) requires that an operator analyze all available information about the integrity of the entire
pipeline and consequences of a failure, including information critical to determining the potential for, and
preventing, damage due to excavation, including current and planned damage prevention activities, and
development or planned development along the pipeline segment; data gathered through the integrity assessment
requirements of 195.452; data gathered in conjunction with other inspections, tests, surveillance and patrols
required by Part 195, including, corrosion control monitoring and cathodic protection surveys; and information
about how a failure would affect the high consequence area, such as location of the water intake.
2 Historical data, in addition to current data, is critical to analyzing the integrity of the entire pipeline and
consequences of a failure.
2



Response to this Notice
This Notice is provided pursuant to 49 U.S.C. § 60108(a) and 49 C.F.R. § 190.206. Enclosed
as part of this Notice is a document entitled Response Options for Pipeline Operators in
Compliance Proceedings. Please refer to this document and note the response options. Be
advised that all material you submit in response to this enforcement action is subject to being
made publicly available. If you believe that any portion of your responsive material qualifies
for confidential treatment under 5 U.S.C. 552(b), along with the complete original document
you must provide a second copy of the document with the portions you believe qualify for
confidential treatment redacted and an explanation of why you believe the redacted
information qualifies for confidential treatment under 5 U.S.C. 552(b).
Following the receipt of this Notice, you have 30 days to submit written comments, revised
procedures, or a request for a hearing under §190.211. If you do not respond within 30 days of
receipt of this Notice, this constitutes a waiver of your right to contest the allegations in this
Notice and authorizes the Associate Administrator for Pipeline Safety to find facts as alleged
in this Notice without further notice to you and to issue an Order Directing Amendment. If
your plans or procedures are found inadequate as alleged in this Notice, you may be ordered to
amend your plans or procedures to correct the inadequacies (49 C.F.R. § 190.206). If you are
not contesting this Notice, we propose that you submit your amended procedures to my office
within 60 days of receipt of this Notice. This period may be extended by written request for
good cause. Once the inadequacies identified herein have been addressed in your amended
procedures, this enforcement action will be closed.
It is requested (not mandated) that DCOR LLC maintain documentation of the safety
improvement costs associated with fulfilling this Notice of Amendment (preparation/revision
of plans, procedures) and submit the total to Dustin Hubbard, Director, Western Region,
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration. In correspondence concerning this
matter, please refer to CPF 5-2020-7001M and, for each document you submit, please provide
a copy in electronic format whenever possible.
Sincerely,
Dustin Hubbard
Director, Western Region
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
Enclosure: Response Options for Pipeline Operators in Compliance Proceedings
cc: PHP-60 Compliance Registry
PHP-500 N. Cruz (#166309)
3
- **truncated:** false
- **body characters:** 9270
