# HARVEST ALASKA, LLC — Notice of Probable Violation

- **operation:** document
- **citation:** CPF 52023008NOPV
- **title:** HARVEST ALASKA, LLC — Notice of Probable Violation
- **source type:** enforcement
- **agency:** Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
- **status:** historical
- **official:** true
- **published on:** 2023-07-05
- **effective on:** Not available
- **summary:** CLOSED notice of probable violation citing 192.605(c)(1)(iii), 192.805(b).
- **machine formats:** - **json:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-enforcement-52023008nopv.json
- **markdown:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-enforcement-52023008nopv.md
- **app url:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-enforcement-52023008nopv
- **source url:** https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-data/case/52023008NOPV
**body:**

Notice of Probable Violation involving HARVEST ALASKA, LLC. PHMSA's enforcement data identifies the cited regulations as 192.605(c)(1)(iii),  192.805(b). The case was opened on 2023-07-05 and is reported as closed as of 2024-01-02. Proposed civil penalty: $33,500. Assessed civil penalty: $0. Open the official case record for notices, responses, orders, and the latest status.

Official case documents:

52023008NOPV_Final Order_01022024_(22-243713).pdf: https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-documents/52023008NOPV/52023008NOPV_Final%20Order_01022024_(22-243713).pdf

52023008NOPV_Final Order_01022024_(22-243713)_text.pdf: https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-documents/52023008NOPV/52023008NOPV_Final%20Order_01022024_(22-243713)_text.pdf

52023008NOPV_Operator Response to Notice_08022023_(22-243713).pdf: https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-documents/52023008NOPV/52023008NOPV_Operator%20Response%20to%20Notice_08022023_(22-243713).pdf

52023008NOPV_PCP_07052023_(22-243713).pdf: https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-documents/52023008NOPV/52023008NOPV_PCP_07052023_(22-243713).pdf

52023008NOPV_PCP_07052023_(22-243713)_text.pdf: https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-documents/52023008NOPV/52023008NOPV_PCP_07052023_(22-243713)_text.pdf

52023008NOPV_Final Order_01022024_(22-243713)_text.pdf

January 2, 2024
VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL TO: jason rebrook@harvestmidstream.com
Jason Rebrook
Chief Executive Officer
Harvest Alaska, LLC
3800 Centerpoint Dr., Suite 1000
Anchorage, Alaska 99503
Re: CPF No. 5-2023-008-NOPV
Dear Mr. Rebrook:
Enclosed please find the Final Order issued in the above-referenced case. It makes a finding of
violation and assesses a civil penalty of $0. Accordingly, this case is now closed. Service of the
Final Order by e-mail is effective upon the date of transmission and acknowledgement of receipt
as provided under 49 C.F.R. § 190.5.
Thank you for your cooperation in this matter.
Sincerely,
Alan K. Mayberry
Associate Administrator
for Pipeline Safety
Enclosure
cc: Mr. Dustin Hubbard, Director, Western Region, Office of Pipeline Safety, PHMSA
Mr. Andrew Limmer, Vice President, Harvest Alaska, LLC,
alimmer@harvestmidstream.com
Mr. Harold Colgrove, Integrity & Regulatory Compliance Manager, Harvest Alaska,
LLC, harold.colgrove@harvestmidstream.com
Mr. Ben Hagedorn, Regulatory Compliance Specialist, Harvest Alaska, LLC,
ben.hagedorn@harvestmidstream.com
CONFIRMATION OF RECEIPT REQUESTED



U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PIPELINE AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS SAFETY ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE OF PIPELINE SAFETY
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20590
____________________________________
In the Matter of )
Harvest Alaska, LLC, ) CPF No. 5-2023-008-NOPV
)
)
)
Respondent. )
____________________________________)
FINAL ORDER
From July 25 through July 29, 2022, pursuant to 49 U.S.C. § 60117, a representative of the Pipeline
and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA), Office of Pipeline Safety (OPS),
conducted an on-site pipeline safety inspection of Harvest Alaska, LLC’s (Harvest or Respondent)
Northstar Gas Pipeline in Anchorage, Alaska. Harvest, an affiliate of Harvest Midstream Company,
is a privately held midstream services provider based in Anchorage, Alaska. Harvest operates
pipeline systems in Alaska’s Cook Inlet and on the North Slope, including the Northstar Gas
Pipeline, a 10-inch, 16-mile gas transmission pipeline.1
As a result of the inspection, the Director, Western Region, OPS (Director), issued to Respondent,
by letter dated July 5, 2023, a Notice of Probable Violation and Proposed Civil Penalty (Notice). In
accordance with 49 C.F.R. § 190.207, the Notice proposed finding that Harvest had violated 49
C.F.R. § 192.805(b) and proposed assessing a civil penalty of $33,500 for the alleged violation.
The Notice also included a warning item pursuant to 49 C.F.R. § 190.205, which warned the
operator to correct the probable violation or face possible future enforcement action
Harvest responded to the Notice by letter dated August 2, 2023 (Response). Harvest did not contest
any of the allegations but requested that the proposed civil penalty be reduced. Respondent did not
request a hearing and therefore has waived its right to one.
FINDING OF VIOLATION
In its Response, Respondent did not contest the allegation in the Notice that it violated 49 C.F.R.
Part 192, as follows:
1 Harvest Midstream, History: Our Story, https://www.harvestmidstream.com/about-us/history/ (last visited Sept. 26,
2023); Harvest Midstream, Harvest Alaska Acquires 49 Percent Stake in Taps And Alyeska (Aug. 27, 2019),
https://www.harvestmidstream.com/news/harvest-alaska-acquires-49-percent-stake-in-taps-and-alyeska/.



Item 2: The Notice alleged that Respondent violated 49 C.F.R. § 192.805(b), which states:
§ 192.805 Qualification program.
Each operator shall have and follow a written qualification program. The
program shall include provisions to:
(a) . . . .
(b) Ensure through evaluation that individuals performing covered tasks
are qualified;
The Notice alleged that Respondent violated 49 C.F.R. § 192.805(b) by failing to ensure through
evaluation that individuals performing covered tasks are qualified. Specifically, the Notice alleged
that a contractor completed an inspection of shutdown valve SDV-9420 on August 26, 2020, prior
to being qualified to complete this task.
Respondent did not contest this allegation of violation. Accordingly, based upon a review of all of
the evidence, I find that Respondent violated 49 C.F.R. § 192.805(b) by failing to ensure through
evaluation that individuals performing covered tasks are qualified.
This finding of violation will be considered a prior offense in any subsequent enforcement action
taken against Respondent.
ASSESSMENT OF PENALTY
Under 49 U.S.C. § 60122, Respondent is subject to an administrative civil penalty not to exceed
$200,000 per violation for each day of the violation, up to a maximum of $2,000,000 for any related
series of violations.2
In determining the amount of a civil penalty under 49 U.S.C. § 60122 and 49 C.F.R. § 190.225, I
must consider the following criteria: the nature, circumstances, and gravity of the violation,
including adverse impact on the environment; the degree of Respondent’s culpability; the history of
Respondent’s prior offenses; any effect that the penalty may have on its ability to continue doing
business; the good faith of Respondent in attempting to comply with the pipeline safety regulations;
and self-disclosure or actions to correct a violation prior to discovery by PHMSA. In addition, I
may consider the economic benefit gained from the violation without any reduction because of
subsequent damages, and such other matters as justice may require. The Notice proposed a total
civil penalty of $33,500 for the violation cited above.
Item 2: The Notice proposed a civil penalty of $33,500 for Respondent’s violation of 49 C.F.R.
§ 192.805(b), for failing to ensure through evaluation that individuals performing covered tasks are
qualified. Respondent argued the penalty should be reduced for two reasons. First, Harvest argued
it faced significant hardship with operator qualifications during the COVID-19 National
Emergency. Harvest noted it should have, but failed to notify PHMSA of this hardship, as stated in
PHMSA’s Notice of Enforcement Discretion.3 Second, Harvest stated it has taken actions to
2 These amounts are adjusted annually for inflation. See 49 C.F.R. § 190.223 for adjusted amounts.
3 On March 20, 2020, PHMSA issued a “Notice of Stay of Enforcement and Notice of Enforcement Discretion to
Operators Affected by the Coronavirus (COVID-19) Outbreak,” noting that PHMSA would refrain from enforcing



substantially improve the operator qualification program, including the introduction of automated
reporting capabilities to track worker credentials and qualifications. In effect, Harvest notified
PHMSA of the operator qualification hardship in its Response, as requested in the Notice of
Enforcement Discretion.
Pursuant to the above-mentioned Notice of Enforcement Discretion, I may consider the impact the
COVID-19 National Emergency had on Harvest’s ability to comply with the operator qualification
requirements. The Notice identified one valve inspection that was conducted by an unqualified
individual. Two days after that inspection, Harvest qualified the individual. I find it appropriate to
reduce the civil penalty because the noncompliance occurred while the Notice of Enforcement
Discretion was in place and because the operator took prompt remedial action. Such circumstances
warrant assessing a reduced civil penalty under the “other matters as justice may require”
assessment criterion. Accordingly, I assess Respondent a reduced civil penalty of $0 for the
violation of 49 C.F.R. § 192.805(b).
WARNING ITEM
With respect to Item 1, the Notice alleged a probable violation of Part 192, but identified it as a
warning item pursuant to § 190.205. The warning was for:
49 C.F.R. § 192.605(c)(1)(iii) (Item 1) ─ Respondent’s alleged failure to provide a
record documenting that an abnormal operating condition (AOC) had occurred after
a loss of communications was discovered.
Harvest presented information in its Response showing that it had taken certain actions to address
the cited item. If OPS finds a violation of this item in a subsequent inspection, Respondent may be
subject to future enforcement action.
The terms and conditions of this Final Order are effective upon service in accordance with 49
C.F.R. § 190.5.
January 2, 2024
___________________________________ _________________________
Alan K. Mayberry Date Issued
Associate Administrator
for Pipeline Safety
probable violations of the pipeline safety regulations if operators notify PHMSA of hardship due to COVID-19. See
PHMSA, Notice of Stay of Enforcement and Notice of Enforcement Discretion to Operators Affected by the
Coronavirus (COVID-19) Outbreak (March 20, 2020), https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/2020-
03/PHMSA%20Notice%20on%20Enforcement.pdf. PHMSA terminated the stay on May 19, 2021. PHMSA, Notice of
Termination of the March 20, 2020 Stay of Enforcement and Notice of Enforcement Discretion to Operators Affected
by the Coronavirus (COVID-19) Outbreak (May 19, 2021), https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/2021-
05/Notice%20of%20Termination%20of%20COVID%20Stay%20of%20Enforcement Discretion.pdf.
- **truncated:** false
- **body characters:** 10415
