# MIDWAY SUNSET COGENERATION CO — Notice of Probable Violation

- **operation:** document
- **citation:** CPF 52024014NOPV
- **title:** MIDWAY SUNSET COGENERATION CO — Notice of Probable Violation
- **source type:** enforcement
- **agency:** Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
- **status:** historical
- **official:** true
- **published on:** 2024-07-11
- **effective on:** Not available
- **summary:** CLOSED notice of probable violation citing 192.605(a), 192.705(b), 192.805(b).
- **machine formats:** - **json:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-enforcement-52024014nopv.json
- **markdown:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-enforcement-52024014nopv.md
- **app url:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-enforcement-52024014nopv
- **source url:** https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-data/case/52024014NOPV
**body:**

Notice of Probable Violation involving MIDWAY SUNSET COGENERATION CO. PHMSA's enforcement data identifies the cited regulations as 192.605(a),  192.705(b),  192.805(b). The case was opened on 2024-07-11 and is reported as closed as of 2024-10-01. Proposed civil penalty: $43,000. Assessed civil penalty: $21,500. Open the official case record for notices, responses, orders, and the latest status.

Official case documents:

52024014NOPV_Final Order_09252024_(23-264914).pdf: https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-documents/52024014NOPV/52024014NOPV_Final%20Order_09252024_(23-264914).pdf

52024014NOPV_Final Order_09252024_(23-264914)_text.pdf: https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-documents/52024014NOPV/52024014NOPV_Final%20Order_09252024_(23-264914)_text.pdf

52024014NOPV_Operator Response to Notice_08092024_(23-264914).pdf: https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-documents/52024014NOPV/52024014NOPV_Operator%20Response%20to%20Notice_08092024_(23-264914).pdf

52024014NOPV_PCP_07112024_(23-264914).pdf: https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-documents/52024014NOPV/52024014NOPV_PCP_07112024_(23-264914).pdf

52024014NOPV_PCP_07112024_(23-264914)_text.pdf: https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-documents/52024014NOPV/52024014NOPV_PCP_07112024_(23-264914)_text.pdf

52024014NOPV_Final Order_09252024_(23-264914)_text.pdf

September 25, 2024
VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL TO: lpollema@midwaysunset.com
Lowell Pollema
Executive Director
Midway Sunset Cogeneration Company
3466 W. Crocker Springs Road
Fellows, California 93224
Re: CPF No. 5-2024-014-NOPV
Dear Mr. Pollema:
Enclosed please find the Final Order issued in the above-referenced case. It withdraws one of
the allegations of violation, makes a finding of violation, and assesses an adjusted civil penalty
of $21,500. The penalty payment terms are set forth in the Final Order. This enforcement action
closes automatically upon receipt of payment. Service of the Final Order by e-mail is effective
upon the date of transmission and acknowledgement of receipt as provided under 49 C.F.R.
§ 190.5.
Thank you for your cooperation in this matter.
Sincerely,
Alan K. Mayberry
Associate Administrator
for Pipeline Safety
Enclosure
cc: Mr. Dustin Hubbard, Director, Western Region, Office of Pipeline Safety, PHMSA
Mr. Michael Williams, DOT Primary Compliance, Midway Sunset Cogeneration Co.,
mwilliams@midwaysunset.com
Mr. Greg Jans, Plant Manager, Midway Sunset Cogeneration Co.,
management@midwaysunset.com
CONFIRMATION OF RECEIPT REQUESTED



U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PIPELINE AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS SAFETY ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE OF PIPELINE SAFETY
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20590
_____________________________________
In the Matter of )
Midway Sunset Cogeneration Company, ) )
)
)
Respondent. )
_____________________________________)
CPF No. 5-2024-014-NOPV
FINAL ORDER
From March 6 through March 9, 2023, pursuant to 49 U.S.C. § 60117, representatives of the
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA), Office of Pipeline Safety
(OPS), conducted an on-site pipeline safety inspection of the facilities and records of Midway
Sunset Cogeneration Company’s (Midway or Respondent) natural gas transmission line from the
Kern River tie-in to the Midway Plant in Fellows, California.
As a result of the inspection, the Director, Western Region, OPS (Director), issued to
Respondent, by letter dated July 11, 2024, a Notice of Probable Violation and Proposed Civil
Penalty (Notice). In accordance with 49 C.F.R. § 190.207, the Notice proposed finding that
Midway had committed two violations of 49 C.F.R. Part 192 and proposed assessing a civil
penalty of $43,000 for the alleged violations. The Notice also included an additional two
warning items pursuant to 49 C.F.R. § 190.205, which warned Respondent to correct the
probable violations or face possible future enforcement action.
Midway responded to the Notice by letter dated August 9, 2024 (Response). In its Response,
Respondent contested Notice Item 3 and its associated civil penalty. Midway did not contest
Notice Items 1, 2, or 4. Respondent did not request a hearing and therefore has waived its right
to one.
FINDING OF VIOLATION
The Notice alleged that Respondent violated 49 C.F.R. Part 192, as follows:
Item 1: The Notice alleged that Respondent violated 49 C.F.R. § 192.605(a), which states:
§ 192.605 Procedural manual for operations, maintenance, and
emergencies.



(a) General. Each operator shall prepare and follow for each pipeline, a
manual of written procedures for conducting operations and maintenance
activities and for emergency response. For transmission lines, the manual
must also include procedures for handling abnormal operations. This
manual must be reviewed and updated by the operator at intervals not
exceeding 15 months, but at least once each calendar year. This manual
must be prepared before operations of a pipeline system commence.
Appropriate parts of the manual must be kept at locations where operations
and maintenance activities are conducted.
The Notice alleged that Respondent violated 49 C.F.R. § 192.605(a) by failing to follow its
written procedures for conducting operations and maintenance (O&M) activities. Specifically,
the Notice alleged that the Midway-Sunset Mojave Gas Operation Manual stated that the O&M
manual review will be performed in July of each year, but Midway could not produce records
evidencing that the O&M manual reviews were performed in 2019, 2020, 2021, or 2022.
In its Response, Midway stated that it did not contest the allegation of violation. Accordingly,
after considering all of the evidence, I find that Respondent violated 49 C.F.R. § 192.605(a) by
failing to follow its written procedures for conducting O&M activities.
This finding of violation will be considered a prior offense in any subsequent enforcement action
taken against Respondent.
Item 3: The Notice alleged that Respondent violated 49 C.F.R. § 192.705(b), which states:
§ 192.705 Transmission lines: Patrolling.
(a)....
(b) The frequency of patrols is determined by the size of the line, the
operating pressures, the class location, terrain, weather, and other relevant
factors, but intervals between patrols may not be longer than prescribed in
the following table:
Maximum interval between patrols
Class
location of
At highway and railroad
line
crossings
At all other places
1,2
7 ½ months; but at least twice
15 months; but at least
each calendar year
once each calendar year.
3
4 ½ months; but at least four
7 ½ months; but at least
times each calendar year
twice each calendar year.
4
4 ½ months; but at least four
4 ½ months; but at least
times each calendar year
four times each calendar
year.



The Notice alleged that Respondent violated 49 C.F.R. § 192.705(b) by failing to observe surface
conditions on the transmission line right-of-way for indications of leaks, construction activity, and
other factors affecting safety and operation on its pipeline in a Class 1 location at highway or railroad
crossings every 7½ months but at least twice each calendar year. Specifically, the Notice alleged
that Midway failed to conduct the required patrol frequency in time periods including June 28,
2019, to April 27, 2020; April 27, 2020, to April 13, 2021; and April 13, 2021, to December 21,
2021.
In its Response, Midway stated that it located the records of its patrols over those time periods.
Midway provided copies demonstrating completion of the required patrol frequencies. In a
recommendation for final action submitted pursuant to § 190.209(b)(7), the Director
recommended withdrawing the alleged violation of § 192.705(b).
Accordingly, after considering all of the evidence, I find that Midway did not fail to comply with
§ 192.705(b). Based upon the foregoing, I hereby order that Item 3 be withdrawn.
ASSESSMENT OF PENALTY
Under 49 U.S.C. § 60122, Respondent is subject to an administrative civil penalty exceeding
$200,000 per violation for each day of the violation, with a maximum administrative civil
penalty exceeding $2,000,000 for any related series of violations.1
In determining the amount of a civil penalty under 49 U.S.C. § 60122 and 49 C.F.R. § 190.225, I
must consider the following criteria: the nature, circumstances, and gravity of the violation,
including adverse impact on the environment; the degree of Respondent’s culpability; the history
of Respondent’s prior offenses; any effect that the penalty may have on its ability to continue
doing business; the good faith of Respondent in attempting to comply with the pipeline safety
regulations; and self-disclosure or actions to correct a violation prior to discovery by PHMSA.
In addition, I may consider the economic benefit gained from the violation without any reduction
because of subsequent damages, and such other matters as justice may require. The Notice
proposed a total civil penalty of $43,000 for the violations cited above.
Item 1: The Notice proposed a civil penalty of $21,500 for Respondent’s violation of 49 C.F.R.
§ 192.605(a), for failing to follow its written procedures for conducting O&M activities. In its
Response, Midway did not present any evidence or argument justifying a reduction in or
elimination of the proposed penalty. Accordingly, having reviewed the record and considered
the assessment criteria, I assess Respondent a civil penalty of $21,500 for violation of 49 C.F.R.
§ 192.605(a).
Item 3: The Notice proposed a civil penalty of $21,500 for Respondent’s alleged violation of 49
C.F.R. § 192.705(b). Since this alleged violation has been withdrawn, for the reasons set forth
above, the proposed civil penalty shall also be withdrawn.
In summary, having reviewed the record and considered the assessment criteria for each of the
1 These amounts are adjusted annually for inflation. See 49 C.F.R. § 190.223 for adjusted amounts.



Items cited above, I assess Respondent a total adjusted civil penalty of $21,500.
Payment of the civil penalty must be made within 20 days after receipt of this Final Order.
Federal regulations (49 C.F.R. § 89.21(b)(3)) require such payment to be made by wire transfer
through the Federal Reserve Communications System (Fedwire), to the account of the U.S.
Treasury. Detailed instructions are contained in the enclosure. Questions concerning wire
transfers should be directed to: Financial Operations Division (AMK-325), Federal Aviation
Administration, Mike Monroney Aeronautical Center, 6500 S MacArthur Blvd, Oklahoma City,
Oklahoma 79169. The Financial Operations Division telephone number is (405) 954-8845.
Failure to pay the civil penalty will result in accrual of interest at the current annual rate in
accordance with 31 U.S.C. § 3717, 31 C.F.R. § 901.9 and 49 C.F.R. § 89.23. Pursuant to those
same authorities, a late penalty charge of six percent (6%) per annum will be charged if payment
is not made within 110 days of service. Furthermore, failure to pay the civil penalty may result
in referral of the matter to the Attorney General for appropriate action in a district court of the
United States.
WARNING ITEMS
With respect to Items 2 and 4, the Notice alleged probable violations of Part 192, but identified
them as warning items pursuant to § 190.205. The warnings were for:
49 C.F.R. § 192.605(a) (Item 2) ─ Respondent’s alleged failure to update and
review its Emergency Response Plan (ERP) manual at intervals not exceeding 15
months, but at least once each calendar year; and
49 C.F.R. § 192.805(b) (Item 4) ─ Respondent’s alleged failure to confirm
through evaluation that individuals performing covered tasks were qualified.
Midway presented information in its Response showing that it had taken certain actions to
address the cited items. If OPS finds a violation of any of these items in a subsequent inspection,
Respondent may be subject to future enforcement action.
Under 49 C.F.R. § 190.243, Respondent may submit a Petition for Reconsideration of this Final
Order to the Associate Administrator, Office of Pipeline Safety, PHMSA, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE, East Building, 2nd Floor, Washington, DC 20590, with a copy sent to the Office of
Chief Counsel, PHMSA, at the same address. The written petition must be received no later than
20 days after receipt of the Final Order by Respondent. Any petition submitted must contain a
brief statement of the issue(s) and meet all other requirements of 49 C.F.R. § 190.243. The filing
of a petition automatically stays the payment of any civil penalty assessed. The other terms of
the order, including any corrective action, remain in effect unless the Associate Administrator,
upon request, grants a stay. If Respondent submits payment of the civil penalty, the Final Order
becomes the final administrative decision and the right to petition for reconsideration is waived.
The terms and conditions of this Final Order are effective upon service in accordance with 49



C.F.R. § 190.5.
September 25, 2024
___________________________________ __________________________
Alan K. Mayberry Date Issued
Associate Administrator
for Pipeline Safety
- **truncated:** false
- **body characters:** 13056