# Categorizing and Transporting Low Specific Activity Materials and Surface Contaminated Object

- **operation:** document
- **citation:** PHMSA Guidance, Categorizing and Transporting Low Specific Activity Materials and Surface Contaminated Object
- **title:** Categorizing and Transporting Low Specific Activity Materials and Surface Contaminated Object
- **source type:** guidance
- **agency:** Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
- **status:** guidance
- **official:** true
- **published on:** 1998-06-01
- **effective on:** 1998-06-01
- **summary:** Categorizing and Transporting Low Specific Activity Materials and Surface Contaminated Object Document ML15336A927.pdf (4.03 MB) A guidebook on the proper classification and packaging of low specific activity materials and surface contaminated objects. Issued Date: Monday, June 1, 1998
- **machine formats:** - **json:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-guidance-categorizing-and-transporting-low-specific-activity-materials-932e730b.json
- **markdown:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-guidance-categorizing-and-transporting-low-specific-activity-materials-932e730b.md
- **app url:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-guidance-categorizing-and-transporting-low-specific-activity-materials-932e730b
- **source url:** https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/regulatory-compliance/phmsa-guidance/categorizing-and-transporting-low-specific-activity-materials
**body:**

Categorizing and Transporting Low Specific Activity Materials and Surface Contaminated Object

Document

 ML15336A927.pdf (4.03 MB)

        A guidebook on the proper classification and packaging of low specific activity materials and surface contaminated objects.

          Issued Date: Monday, June 1, 1998

<<<PAGE 1>>>

NUREG-1608
RAMREG-003
Categorizing and Transporting
Low Specific Activity Materials
and Surface Contaminated
Objects
Prepared by
J. Cook, R. Lewis, E. Easton, NRC
R. Boyle, DOT
R. Pope, ORNL
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards
U.S. Department of Transportation
Research and Special Programs Administration

<<<PAGE 2>>>

AVAILABILl1Y NOTICE
Availability of Reference Materials Cited in NRC Publications
Most documents cited in NRC publications will be available from one of the following sources:
1. The NRC Public Document Room, 2120 L Street, NW., Lower Level, Washington, DC
20555-0001
2. The Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, P. O. Box 37082,
Washington, DC 20402-9328
3. The National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161-0002
Although the listing that follows represents the majority of documents cited in NRC publica-
tions, it is not intended to be exhaustive.
Referenced documents available for inspection and copying for a fee from the NRC Public
Document Room Include NRC correspondence and internai NRC memoranda; NRC bulletins,
circulars, information notices, inspection and investigation notices: licensee event reports;
vendor reports and correspondence; Commission papers; and applicant and licensee docuw
ments and correspondence.
The following documents in the NUREG series are available for purchase from the Government
Printing Office: formal NRC staff and contractor reports, NRG-sponsored conference pro·
ceedings, international agreement reports, grantee reports, and NRC booklets and bro-
chures. Also available are regulatory guides, NRC regulations in the Code of Federal Regula-
tions, and Nuclear Regulatory Commission Issuances.
Documents available from the National Technical Information Service include NUREG-series
reports and technical reports prepared by other Federal agencies and reports prepared by the
Atomic Energy Commission, forerunner agency to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Documents available from public and special technical libraries include all open literature
items, such as books, journal articles, and transactions. Federal Register notices, Federal
and State legislation, and congressional reports can usually be obtained from these libraries.
Documents such as theses, dissertations, foreign reports and translations, and non-NRC con-
ference proceedings are available for purchase from the organization sponsoring the publica-
tion cited.
Single copies of NRC draft reports. are available free, to the extent of supply, upon written
request to the Office of Administration, Distribution and Mail Services Section, U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, Washington DC 20555-0001.
Copies of industry codes and standards used in a substantive manner in the NRC regulatory
process are maintained at the NRC Library, Two White Flint North, 11545 Rockville Pike, Rock-
ville, MD 20852-2738, for use by the public. Codes and standards are usually copyrighted
and may be purchased from the originating organization or, if they are American National
Standards, from the American National Standards Institute, 1430 Broadway, New York, NY
10018-3308.

<<<PAGE 3>>>

NUREG-1608
RAMREG-003
Categorizing and Transporting
Low Specific Activity Materials
and Surface Contaminated
Objects
Manuscript Completed: June 1998
Date Published: July 1998
Prepared by
J. Cook, R Lewis, E. Easton, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
R. Doyle, U.S. Department of Transportation
R. Pope, Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Spent Fuel Project Office
Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Washington, DC 20555-0001
Research and Special Programs Administration
U.S. Department of Transportation
400 Seventh Street, SW
Washington, DC 20590-0003

<<<PAGE 4>>>



<<<PAGE 5>>>

ABSTRACT
The primary purpose of this guidance is to assist shippers in preparing low specific activity
materials (LSA) and surface contaminated objects (SCOs) for shipment in compliance with
Federal regulations. Guidance is provided in question and answer format on the classification,
categorization, packaging and transportation of LSA and SCOs, including the definition of LSA
and SCOs, the determination of distribution of activity in LSA material or on SCO surfaces,
mixing LSA and SCOs in a package, radiation level measurements, and various other aspects of
transporting LSA and SCOs.
There are many requirements, other than those addressed herein, imposed in the shipment of LSA
and SCOs. The guidance represents one or more methods of demonstrating compliance with the
regulatory requirements for LSA material and SCOs that have been found acceptable to NRC and
DOT; however, additional methods may also be found to be acceptable with adequate
justification.
iii NUREG-1608

<<<PAGE 6>>>



<<<PAGE 7>>>

CONTENTS
ABSTRACT .............................................................. iii
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ..................................................... x
1 INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-1
2 BACKGROUND ........................................................ 2-1
3 SURFACE CONTAMINATED OBJECTS .................................... 3-1
3.1 Categorizing a Class 7 (Radioactive) Material as an sea ................ 3-1
3.1.1 If a contaminated object is also activated, can it be categorized
as an SCO? ............................................. 3-2
3.1.2 Is there a contamination level below which an object does
not need to be categorized as an SCO or as radioactive
material, n.o.s.? .......................................... 3-2
3.1.3 How should a contaminated object with a limited quantity of
radioactive material be categorized? .......................... 3-2
3.1.4 Must all radionuclides be individually accounted for, and
is there an applicable sum or fractions rule which should
be applied in assessing compliance with the sea
contamination limits? ..................................... 3-3
3.1.5 Are there any constraints on mixing SCOs with nonhazardous
materials in a packaging? ................................... 3-3
3.1.6 Can an object which might qualify as an sea-I be categorized
and shipped as an SC0-11? ................................. 3-3
3.2 Clarification of Terms Used in the sea Definitions .................... 3-3
3.2.1 What is contamination? ................................... 3-4
3.2.2 What is fixed contamination and non-fixed (removable)
contamination? .......................................... 3-4
3.2.3 What are accessible surfaces and inaccessible surfaces for seas? ... 3-5
v NUREG-1608

<<<PAGE 8>>>

Contents
3.3 Quantity-Based Method for Compliance With the SCO Definitions ......... 3 .. 5
3.3.1 What is a practical method for categorizing an object as
SCO for shipment under exclusive-use in a strong tight
container [using 49 CPR 173.427(b)(3)]? ...................... 3-6
3.3.2 What methods should be used for categorizing an object
containing greater than 1 A2 as SCO? ......................... 3-7
3 .4 Determining Contamination Levels on Surfaces . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-8
3.4.1 What methods are acceptable for determining fixed and
nonRfixed contamination on accessible and inaccessible
surfaces of SCOs? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 -8
3.4.2 When taking measurements, how can one distinguish
fixed accessible contamination from total inaccessible
contamination? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-8
3.4.3 How can fixed alpha contamination be measured? ................ 3-9
3.4.4 How can contamination level measurements be averaged? .......... 3-9
3.4.5 How is wiping efficiency used in the determination of
contamination on package external surfaces and SCOs? .......... 3-10
4 LOW SPECIFIC ACTIVITY MATERIAL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-1
4.1 Categorizing a Class 7 (Radioactive) Material as LSA .................. 4-1
4 .1. 1 What general categories of materials are intended to be
shipped as LSA? ......................................... 4-1
4.1.2 Is there a contamination limit for an LSA material's surfaces? ....... 4-2
4.1.3 When an unshielded LSA material exceeds 10 mSv/hr
(1 rem/hr) at 3 m (9.9 ft), what is the proper shipping name? ....... 4-3
4 .1. 4 Is there an object size below which collections of small,
contaminated objects may be categorized and shipped as LSA
material (as opposed to SCOs)? ............................. 4-3
4 .1. 5 Can activated metals, or a radioactive material which is
solidified or absorbed on nonradioactive material, be
categorized as LSA-11? .................................... 4-4
NUREG-1608 vi

<<<PAGE 9>>>

Contents
4 .1. 6 Can the mass of grout or binding agents used in or on
an object be included in the LSA specific activity or
unshielded dose rate determinations? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-4
4 .1. 7 Can leach testing for disposal ( 10 CFR Part 61) substitute
for the LSA-III leach test? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-4
4.1.8 Is it acceptable to use representative samples in the
LSA-111 leach test? ....................................... 4-5
4.1.9 Is it necessary to leach test activated metals? .................... 4-6
4.2 Clarification of Tenns Used in the LSA Definitions ..................... 4-6
4.2.1 What is the intent of the terminology rubble, other
debris and activated material in the LSA-I definition? ............ 4-6
4.2.2 What is the difference between distributed throughout
and essentially uniformly distributer.I? ......................... 4-7
4.2.3 What practical techniques can be used for demonstrating
the activity in an LSA material is distributed throughout
or essentially uniformly distributed, as applicable? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-7
4.2.4 Can compliance with NRC's "Branch Technical Position
on Concentration Averaging and Encapsulation" be used
to demonstrate that a IJlixture of candidate LSA materials
are distributed throughout or essentially uniformly
distributed, as applicable? .................................. 4-8
4.2. 5 What is a combustible solid with respect to the conveyance
activity limit for LSA material of 100 A2? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-9
4.2.6 What was the misprint in NRC's and DOT's September 28, 1995,
Federal Register final rules (60 FR 50292 and 60 FR 50248)
regarding the tenns distributed throughout and essentially
uniformly distributer.I? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-10
5 UNSHIELDED DOSE RATE LIMIT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-1
5. 1 Intent of the Dose Rate Limit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-1
5.1.1 Where does the unshielded dose rate limit apply? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-2
vii NUREG-1608

<<<PAGE 10>>>

Contents
5.1.2 Do the possible effects ofredistribution of the LSA
material or SCOs in transport (and resultant loss of
self-shielding) need to be assessed? ........................... 5-2
5.1.3 Can liners (e.g., disposal containers), waste binders, or
other packaging materials be considered in complying
with the dose rate limit? ................................... 5-2
5.1.4 If slightly contaminated/activated materials are shipped
in the same package as other LSA material, how should
the external dose rate be calculated and/ or measured for
these non-uniform sources? ................................. 5-3
5.2 Quantity-Based Method for Compliance With the Dose Rate Limit ......... 5-3
5 .2.1 What quantity of LSA material or SC Os in a package
can be assumed, without further analysis, to comply with
the dose rate limit? ....................................... 5-3
5.2.2 For explicit demonstrations of compliance with the dose
rate limits, which methods are acceptable? ...................... 5-4
5.2.3 If package measurements and back-calculations to
unshielded dose rates are used, how can account be
taken for the effects of the packaging (e.g., the
smoothing of radiation readings, and the masking
of "hot spots")? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-4
6 PACKAGING AND SHIPPING REQUIREMENTS ............................. 6-1
6.1 Mixing LSA Materials and SC Os Together or with Other
Hazardous Materials . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-1
6.1.1 What is the general rule for mixing LSA material
and SC Os in a single package? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-1
6.1.2 What is the proper shipping name for a mixed
LSNSCO package? ...................................... 6-2
6.1.3 When a material meets an LSA material definition but
also the definition of another Hazard Class (e.g., corrosive
liquid, n.o.s., PG I), how should the material be classified
and prepared for shipment? ................................ 6-2
NUREG-1608
viii

<<<PAGE 11>>>

Contents
6.2 Pre-Shipment Processing of LSA Material and SCOs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-3
6.2.1 How can accessible surfaces be converted into
inaccessible surfaces? ..................................... 6-3
6.2.2 How can non-fixed (removable) contamination be
rendered fixed? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-3
6.2.3 Can grout or binding agents or encapsulating materials
be considered in LSA-specific requirements? .................... 6-3
6.2.4 Is there a requirement to document the determinations
which show compliance with regulatory requirements
including categorization of a material or object as LSA
material or sea and the determination of unshielded
dose rate? .............................................. 6-4
6.3 Packaging Requirements for LSA Materials and SCOs .................. 6-4
6.3. l What are the design requirements for a strong, tight
package? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-4
6.3.2 Can any LSA material or SCOs be shipped unpackaged
or as its own packaging? .... , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-4
6.3.3 Could a shipper package and transport LSA material
inside a packaging that would otherwise meet the definition
of SCO? ............................................... 6-7
6.3.4 What are the rules for continued use of NRC-certified
Type A LSA packages "grandfathered" by 10 CFR 71.52?
Is exclusive-use required? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-7
7 REFERENCES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-1
APPENDIX A Regulatory Process for Categorizing Materials and
Objects as LSA Material or SCOs and Selecting
Packaging Options ...................................... A - 1
1X NUREG-1608

<<<PAGE 12>>>

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This guidance was jointly developed by the U.S. Department of Transportation and the
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, with technical support from the Oak Ridge National
Laboratory (ORNL).
In preparing the guidance, input was obtained from nuclear industry representatives, including
NRC licensees, those shipping radioactive materials for the U.S. Department of Energy, and
personnel involved in auditing or inspecting the packaging and transport of low specific activity
materials and surface contaminated objects.
NUREG-1608 x

<<<PAGE 13>>>

1 INTRODUCTION
Large volumetric quantities of low-level radioactive waste (LLW) have historically been shipped
as low specific activity (LSA) material. In addition, radioactive ores, plant maintenance and
outage equipment, and U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) wastes have typically been categorized
as LSA. The regulations take into account the inherent properties of LSA materials and surface
contaminated objects (SCOs), and allow for less-strict packaging requirements as compared to
other radioactive materials, while retaining comparable levels of satety at lower costs.
Changes to NRC regulations in Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 71, "Packaging
and Transportation of Radioactive Materials" (NRC, 1996a), and to DOT regulations in Title 49
of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 172 - 178, "Shippers General Requirements for
Shipments and Packaging" (DOT, 1996) have changed the regulatory framework under which
LSA materials are shipped. These revised regulations, which became effective April 1, 1996,
generally make domestic regulations for the safe transportation of radioactive materials
compatible with requirements of the International Atomic Energy Agency's (IAEA) Safety Series
6, Regulations for the Safe Transport of Radioactive Material, 1985 edition (as amended 1990)
(IAEA, 1990a).
Under the previous regulations, the old LSA material category included as a subcategory,
requirements for SCOs. In contrast, under the revised rules, the scheme for shipping these
materials has been refined such that SCOs are now defined as their own category. At first
inspection, this differentiation between the two types of materials seems clear and definitive.
However, the wording of the regulations, and practical considerations in characterizing,
categorizing, handling, packaging, and transporting these materials, result in some uncertainty as
to consic;;tent, practical, and acceptable implementation of the revised requirements.
Under the revised regulations, it is expected that most equipment will be categorized for
shipment as SC0-11, whereas most waste will be categorized as LSA-11. There will probably be
many exceptions to this generalization, including a variety of materials and objects whose
characteristics (both physical and radiological) are uncertain or difficult to characterize.
This guidance is intended to assist both shippers and regulators in applying the regulatory
requirements for LSA material and SCOs properly. It should be recognized that no single
document could address all issues related to the transport of these materials and objects.
This guidance, which is presented in the form of questions and answers, is provided in four
sections addressing:
• issues related specifically to SCOs (Section 3);
• issues related specifically to LSA material (Section 4);
• issues relating to determination of the dose rate 3 m (9.9 ft) from the unshielded
material, object or collection of objects (Section 5); and
• issues relating to the preparations for shipment and the packaging of LSA material
and SCOs (Section 6).
In addition, an appendix (Appendix A) provides a logic flow process, based on the domestic
regulations (DOT, 1996; NRC, 1996), which may be used to guide the characterization and
1-1 NUREG-1608

<<<PAGE 14>>>

Introduction
categorization of materials and objects as LSA material and SCOs. This appendix also contains a
table which can be used to define packaging options available to shippers in the United States
based upon the results of the characterization guided by the logic flow diagrams. The questions
asked and answered in Sections 3 through 6 of this guidance are also identified in the diagrams
presented in the appendix.
This Guidance was published in draft form for public comment. NRC and DOT appreciate the
efforts on the part of all contributors, and have attempted to address the comments to the extent
practicable. However, comments that, in the opinion of NRC and DOT staff, were unclear,
inaccurate, contradictory to regulatory requirements, or non-compelling, were not adopted.
Nothing contained in this guide may be construed as having the force and effect of NRC or DOT
regulations, or as relieving any shipper or licensee from compliance with the requirements of
10 CFR Part 71, 49 CFR Part 173, or any other applicable regulation.
The guidance describes one or more methods of demonstrating compliance with the regulatory
requirements for LSA material and SCOs that NRC and DOT have found acceptable. However,
use of these methods is not mandatory. Methods other than those described here may also be
found to be acceptable based on reseasoned argument, or other adequate justification. Shippers
are reminded that it is their responsibility to be able to demonstrate that their methods satisfy
applicable regulatory requirements.
NUREG-1608 1-2

<<<PAGE 15>>>

2 BACKGROUND
Although the new regulations for LSA material and SCOs are more prescriptive than were the
previous regulations, DOT and NRC personnel have not observed a major economic or practical
impact of the revised rules on the shipment of waste as LSA material or contaminated objects as
SCOs. Specifically, experience shows that such activities have continued to take place in a safe
manner under the new rules.
However, because of the more prescriptive nature of the new rules, many questions have been
asked, and it was determined by DOT and NRC that guidance on the new LSA material and SCO
requirements would benefit both the regulated and the regulators.
Areas of uncertainty in the revised regulations include:
(a) (b) (c) (d) definitions, classification and categorization of materials and objects,
determination of distribution of activity in LSA material or on SCO surfaces,
determinations of the dose rate from the unshielded material or object, and
preparation of materials and objects and selection of proper packaging for transport.
Many of these are related to changes made in the regulations, where, in addition to providing a
category for SCOs separate from LSA materials:
(1) LSA materials are further divided into three subcategories (LSA-I, LSA-II, and LSA-III),
and SCOs are further divided into two subcategories (SCO-I and SC0-11);
(2) the LSA material subcategory definitions make distinctions between the terms essentially
uniformly distributed and distributed throughout depending upon the subcategory of LSA
material;
(3) specific activity limits for LSA material have been tied to each nuclide's Ai value, and
have increased substantially for most nuclides [the A2 quantity is the amount of normal
form radioactive material which can be transported in a non-accident resistant, Type A
package - see, for example 49 CFR 173.433 (DOT, 1996)];
(4) for SCOs~ the radioactive material contamination is distributed on the surfaces of objects
that are not themselves radioactive, and the definitions distinguish between fixed and
non-fixed (i.e., removable) contamination on accessible surfaces but combines them for
inaccessible surfaces;
(5) NRC certification of the package design for shipment of some LSA materials and SCOs
is no longer required unless the dose rate from the unshielded material exceeds 10 mSv/h
(1 rem/h) at 3 m (9.9 ft); and
(6) a new set of packages, industrial packages (IPs), has been authorized for use with LSA
material and SCOs.
2-1 NUREG-1608

<<<PAGE 16>>>



<<<PAGE 17>>>

3 SURFACE CONTAMINATED OBJECTS
The previous regulations contained provisions for shipment of SC Os as a subset of LSA material.
SCOs were included in the LSA material definition in the previous versions of both 10 CPR
71.4 and 49 CFR 173.403, and they were transported using the proper shipping name
"Radioactive material, LSA." However, the previous regulations specified only limits for total
(fixed plus non-fixed) contamination, did not specify accessible nor inaccessible surfaces, and
allowed for averaging the contamination over a large area [i.e., 1 m2 (10.8 ft2)].
SCOs are no longer defined as a subset of LSAmaterial (DOT, 1996; NRC, 1996a). SCOs have
their own proper shipping name, "Radioactive material, surface contaminated object," or
"Radioactive material, SCO;" and they have their own United Nations identification number,
"UN29 l 3 /' as specified in the hazardous material table [ 49 CFR 172.101 (DOT, 1996)].
The SCO definitions [49 CFR 173.403 (DOT, 1996) and 10 CPR 71.4 (NRC, 1996a)] now
specify separate limits for fixed and non-fixed (removable) contamination on accessible surfaces,
and a limit for fixed plus non-fixed contamination on inaccessible surfaces. Compliance with
each of these limits is necessary for categorization of an item as an SCO. However, compliance
does not necessarily imply the need for explicit measurements of the contamination levels, as
further discussed herein. In general, objects that satisfy the SCO definition will not satisfy the
LSA definition, and should not be shipped as such. However, there are some circumstances
where it is appropriate to ship collections of small objects as LSA material (see Section 4.1.4), or
to ship SCOs mixed with LSA material as LSA material (see Section 6.1).
Section 3.1 provides guidance on materials which can be categorized as SCOs. Section 3.2
clarifies some of the technical terms used in the SCO definitions. Section 3.3 provides specific
guidance for complying with the sea definitions, based on the quantity of radioactivity in a
package. Section 3.4 provides guidance for determining contamination levels on surfaces.
3.1 Categorizing a Class 7 (Radioactive) Material as an SCO
Categorizing an object contaminated with Class 7 (radioactive) material as an SCO is an option
for transport as compared with categorizing the material as "Radioactive material, n.o.s.," with
an identification number of "UN 2982." SCO means a solid object which itself is not
radioactive, but which has Class 7 (radioactive) material distributed on its surfaces.
Categorization as SCO provides some relief from the packaging requirements and
communications requirements when compared with the alternative categorization of
"Radioactive material, n.o.s."
Objects that are themselves radioactive (e.g., activated objects) and that are also contaminated
cannot generally be categorized as SCO. The exception to this is discussed below. Objects that
are radioactive and contaminated may be categorized as LSA material insofar as the requirements
specified in the LSA definition are complied with (see Section 4.1.2).
3-1 NUREG-1608

<<<PAGE 18>>>

Surface Contaminated Objects
If a contaminated object is also activated to an average specific activity level less than 70 Bq/g
(2 nCi/g)~see 49 CFR 173.403 (DOT, 1996)-the object itself is not classified as radioactive
material according to 49 CFR 173.403 (DOT, 1996); however, the presence of the contamination
on the object may require that it be classified as a Class 7 (radioactive) material. For such an
object, if the SCO definition is satisfied, the object should then be classified as Class 7, and
shipped as an SCO.
However, if a contaminated object is also activated to an average specific activity level in excess
of 70 Bq/g (2 nCi/g), the object itself is classified as radioactive material according to 10 CPR
71.4 and 49 CFR 173.403 (DOT, 1996; NRC, 1996a). In this event, it may not be categorized as
an SCO since SCOs are, by definition [49 CPR 173.403 and 10 CPR 71.4 (DOT, 1996; NRC,
1996a)], non-radioactive objects having radioactive-contaminated surfaces.
International regulations (IAEA, 1990a) contain a threshold value for contamination, below
which a nonradioactive object [i.e., an object having an average specific activity level less than
70 Bq/g (2 nCi/g)] can be shipped without regard to the radioactivity [See clarification of
contamination in Section 3.2.1]. The contamination threshold value was inadvertently omitted
from the 1996 DOT domestic regulatory revisions (DOT, 1989; DOT, 1996). Consequently, all
objects which are themselves not radioactive, but are slightly contaminated, could still be
construed to qualify as SCO-I. DOT is currently addressing this issue.
In the interim: an object with external contamination may be considered to be excepted from
classification as Class 7 (radioactive) material if: (1) contamination when averaged over each 300
cm2 (46.5 in2) of all surfaces is less than 0.4 Bq/cm2 00-5 µCi/cm2
) for beta and gamma emitters
and low toxicity alpha emitters, and is also less than 0.04 Bq/cm2 (10-6 µCi/cm2) for all other
alpha emitters; and (2) the object itself has an average specific activity less than 70 Bq/g (2
nCi/g).
Any radioactive material that meets the requirements in 49 CPR 173.421, for excepted packages
of limited quantities of Class 7 (radioactive) materials, can be shipped as "Radioactive Material,
excepted package, limited quantity of material, UN2910.'' Note, however, that the activity per
package in a normal form shipment (such as a contaminated object) would be limited to 10·3 A2
as given by Table 7 of 49 CPR 173.425. In such cases, there is no need to evaluate for
compliance with the SCO contamination limits.
NUREG-1608 3-2

<<<PAGE 19>>>

Surface Contaminated Objects
The SCO limits for contamination apply to any 300 cm2 (46.5 in2) • There is no requirement to do
a sum of fractions (or "unity") rule.
An object could be categorized as SCO, even if the surfaces were contaminated to both the limit
for beta and gamma emitters and low toxicity alpha emitters, and to the limit for all other alpha
emitters. Further, it could simultaneously have the contamination at the non-fixed (removable)
limit on accessible surfaces, the fixed limit on accessible surfaces, as well as the limit on
inaccessible surfaces.
Since the SCO limits are stated in terms of activity (i.e., a beta-gamma limit and an alpha limit),
there is no explicit nuclide dependence, and there is no need to sum or identify nuclide fractions
for complying with the SCO definition. However, for shipping papers and labels (if not excepted
from labeling), the nuclides must be identified and listed in accordance with the "95% sum of
fractions" rule in 49 CFR §§ 173.433 and 173.435.
ll_.•~tl•llll1illililllYjlllltlll
Generally, waste management considerations may affect this practice. Three examples of
packages containing SCOs mixed with nonhazardous materials include: SCOs mixed with non-
radioactive materia]s (e.g., binding agents such as grout, or paint), as a means to transform non-
fixed (removable) contamination into fixed contamination; as a means to make an accessible
surface into an inaccessible surface; and as a means of adding structura] capability to the object to
facilitate transport.
Generally, the most appropriate category should be used to assure that response to any incidents
is suitable for the materials present. However, for domestic transport, an SC0-11 has equivalent
packaging requirements to an SC0-1 [49 CFR 173.427(b)(2), (b)(3) and (b)(4) (DOT, 1996)].
Further, since SC0-1 poses less of a contamination hazard than does SC0-11, categorization of an
object as SC0-11 rather than as SC0-1 is a conservative approach. It is permissible to categorize
radioactive material to higher categorization levels and package and ship them accordingly. Thus,
it is permissible to categorize and ship an object which meets the SC0-1 definition as an SC0-11.
Using a higher category for LSA materials may not be as straightforward, however, since the
activity distribution and other conditions of the higher category must be satisfied.
3.2 Clarification of Terms Used in the SCO Definitions
3-3 NUREG-1608

<<<PAGE 20>>>

Surface Contaminated Objects
The definition of SC0-1 and SC0-11 in 10 CFR 71.4 and 49 CFR 173.403 (DOT, 1996; NRC,
1996a) contains several technical terms that are not explicitly defined, namely: contamination,
both fixed and non-fixed, accessible suiface, and inaccessible suiface. This section provides
additional clarification of the intent and meaning of these terms as used in the regulatory
definitions. The terms apply to SCO' s as prepared for transport.
For the purpose of complying with the SCO definitions in the domestic transportation regulations
only (DOT, 1996; NRC, 1996a):
Contamination is the presence of a radioactive substance on a suif ace in
quantities in excess of 0.4 Bq/cm2 (10·5 µCi/cm2
, 22 dpmlcm2)for beta and gamma
emitters and low toxicity alpha emitters or 0.04 Bq/cm2 (10-6 µCi/cm2
, 2.2
dpmlcm2
) for all other alpha emitters.
This is consistent with the definition for contamination provided in the international regulations
(IAEA, l 990a), although a similar definition is not currently included in the U.S. domestic
regulations. DOT is currently considering addition of the contamination definition to 49 CFR
Part 173.
This internationally-recognized lower limit for contamination serves a function in transport
regulations comparable to the limit of 70 Bq/g (2 nCi/g) in the definition of radioactive material
[ 49 CFR 173 .403 (DOT, 1996)]; i.e., materials having specific activities less than this limit are
below the scope of the hazardous material regulations. A definition of contamination is needed
in order to properly utilize the SCO category because the radioactive material definition of 70
Bq/g (2 nCi/g), which is based on an activity per unit mass, is not readily or directly applicable to
SCOs. For nonactivated objects, dividing the activity in the contamination by the mass of the
nonactivated object (to determine whether the object as a whole should or should not be defined
as radioactive material) is generally not appropriate because it opens the possibility for a massive
object with significant amounts of contamination on its surfaces falling below the regulatory
threshold definition of radioactive material [i.e., specific activity would be less than 70 Bq/g
(2 nCi/g)]. This situation is not consistent with the intent of the regulatory exemption limit and
should be avoided.
For the purposes of complying with SCO definitions:
Fixed contamination is contamination that cannot be removed by the wipinf procedure
defined in 49 CFR 173.443, to a detection level of 0.4 Bq/cm2
( 10-5 µCi/cm ) for beta and
gamma emitters and low toxicity alpha emitters, or 0.04 Bq/cm2 ( 1 o-6 µCi/cm2) for all
other alpha emitters. Any other contamination is non-fixed contamination.
NUREG-1608 3-4

<<<PAGE 21>>>

Surface Contaminated Objects
Although used in the definition of SCOs, there are no specific regulatory definitions of fixed
contamination or non-fixed contamination. Therefore, other regulatory requirements [e.g., 49
CFR 173.443 (DOT, 1996)] have been considered in striving to develop consistent definitions.
Specifically, 49 CFR 173.443(a)(l) describes a method for wiping a surface and determining the
level of non-fixed (removable) contamination available from that surface. The text of 49 CFR
l 73.443(a)(l) reads, in part, that the process for determining the level of non-fixed (removable)
contamination consists of "wiping an area of 300 square centimeters· of the surface concerned
with an absorbent material, using moderate pressure, and measuring the activity on the wiping
material. Sufficient measurements must be taken in the most appropriate locations to yield a
representative assessment of the non-fixed contamination levels."
For the purposes of complying with SCO definitions:
An accessible suiface is any suif ace which can readily be wiped by hand, using standard
radiation-measuring techniques. Any other suif ace is an inaccessible surface.
The accessible surface could be contacted if the packaging is removed by an accident. Thus, re-
orientation of the SCO should be considered in identifying the accessible surface. However, a
shipper does not need to consider damage to the object itself in an accident. For example, the
bottom, or top, of an object would be accessible, but surfaces which must be reached by probing
small openings would be inaccessible. A good rule of thumb is that, if a 300 cm2 (46.5 in2
) area
could be reached by a person's hand, it is an accessible surf ace. The phrasing, "by hand" is not
meant to discourage use of as low as is reasonably achievable (ALAR.A) tools such as telescopic
sampling instruments. The phrasing, "standard radiation-measuring techniques," is intended to
imply practices similar to those used for complying with package contamination limits in 49 CFR
173.443.
Note that this guidance would permit some objects, such as a tank, or a long 6 in. diameter pipe,
to have some inaccessible surfaces that are readily measured/swiped. It is generally good
practice to seal off the ends of pipes or tanks, such that a shock to the object could not result in
contamination being easily released through the openings.
3.3 Quantity-Based Method for Compliance With the SCO Definitions
Although pre-shipment determinations are required to demonstrate compliance with the
applicable SCO definition, the regulations do not require measurements of contamination and/or
radiation levels as the only means of accomplishing the determinations. Alternate methods or
combinations of methods may be used to demonstrate compliance. These methods may
include-in addition to measurements--calculations, reasoned arguments, and reference to
previous shipments of similar materials or objects (see section 3.4.1). This section describes a
reasoned argument approach to categorizing SCOs.
The level of detail in these determinations is expected to be commensurate with the potential
hazard that the contamination represents. The potential hazard is based on the quantity (i.e.,
activity) and radio toxicity of the Class 7 (radioactive) material to be shipped, and the
3-5 NUREG-1608

<<<PAGE 22>>>

Surface Contaminated Objects
combination of these two factors is associated with the relevant multiple or fraction of Ai, of the
contaminants involved. Therefore, the first step in any shipment should be to determine the Ai
fraction in the package in accordance with 49 CFR 173.433.
For an SCO, the Ai fraction would typically be determined by analyzing representative swipes of
the accessible surface, gross gamma counts, the total surface area, and assuming the fixed and
inaccessible contamination had a similar radionuclide distribution from a previously determined
facility-specific sample data base. The techniques for determining radionuclide content used in
the previous regulations remain acceptable under the revised regulations (note, however, that the
number of nuclides in the Table of A/Ai values has increased, and the values have changed).
It is possible to make SCO determinations in a manner consistent with 10 CPR Part 20
requirements to maintain occupational exposures as low as is reasonably achievable (ALAR.A).
In practice, NRC and DOT anticipate that almost all SCO packages will contain less than 1 Ai
quantity, and therefore qualify for shipment in strong-tight containers (STCs) pursuant to 49 CPR
173.427(b)(3). A reasoned argument could be used to categorize the great majority of these
candidate SCOs, without the need for detailed, quantitative measurement of fixed, accessible
contamination or total (fixed plus non-fixed) inaccessible surface contamination. Both the beta-
gamma Ai fraction and the alpha A2 fraction must be determined. The materials characterized
using this reasoned argument would be shipped as "Radioactive - SCO."
Demonstration of all of the following 4 conditions can be used to categorize a radioactive
material as an SC0-11. It is expected that these conditions would allow categorization of a great
majority of candidate SCO materials as SCO-II, without the need for detailed, quantitative
measurement of fixed, accessible contamination or total inaccessible surface contamination.
(1) (2) (3) ( 4) The shipment of the SCO-II is made pursuant to 49 CFR 173.427(b)(3), for domestic,
exclusive-use transport of SCOs in strong-tight containers (STCs). Note that this requires
that the radioactive material in the package totals to less than 1 A2 quantity as determined
using the 
- **truncated:** true
- **body characters:** 126059
