# U.S. DOT/PHMSA - Guidance Document for Gas Distribution Integrity Management Rule

- **operation:** document
- **citation:** PHMSA Guidance, U.S. DOT/PHMSA - Guidance Document for Gas Distribution Integrity Management Rule
- **title:** U.S. DOT/PHMSA - Guidance Document for Gas Distribution Integrity Management Rule
- **source type:** guidance
- **agency:** Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
- **status:** guidance
- **official:** true
- **published on:** 2008-06-20
- **effective on:** 2008-06-20
- **summary:** U.S. DOT/PHMSA - Guidance Document for Gas Distribution Integrity Management Rule Document U_S_DOT_PHMSA_-_Guidance_Document_for_Gas_Distribution_Integrity_Management_Rule_.pdf (151.43 KB) This document provides guidance to help large and small, master meter, and LPG operators implement the requirements of subpart P of Part 192. Guidance for large and small operators begins at section I and for master meter and LPG o
- **machine formats:** - **json:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-guidance-us-dotphmsa-guidance-document-gas-distribution-integrity-94c3ac22.json
- **markdown:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-guidance-us-dotphmsa-guidance-document-gas-distribution-integrity-94c3ac22.md
- **app url:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-guidance-us-dotphmsa-guidance-document-gas-distribution-integrity-94c3ac22
- **source url:** https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/regulatory-compliance/phmsa-guidance/us-dotphmsa-guidance-document-gas-distribution-integrity
**body:**

U.S. DOT/PHMSA - Guidance Document for Gas Distribution Integrity Management Rule

Document

 U_S_DOT_PHMSA_-_Guidance_Document_for_Gas_Distribution_Integrity_Management_Rule_.pdf (151.43 KB)

        This document provides guidance to help large and small, master meter, and LPG operators implement the requirements of subpart P of Part 192.  Guidance for large and small operators begins at section I and for master meter and LPG operators at section V of this document.  We request comment on this draft guidance. 

          Issued Date: Friday, June 20, 2008

<<<PAGE 1>>>

Guidance on Carrying Out Requirements in the Gas
Distribution Integrity Management Rule
[Docket No. PHMSA-RSPA-2004-19854]
Pipeline Safety: Integrity Management Program for Gas Distribution
Pipelines
Office of Pipeline Safety
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA)
U.S. Department of Transportation
June 20, 2008
1

<<<PAGE 2>>>

Guidance on Carrying Out Requirements in the Gas Distribution Integrity
Management Rule
This document provides guidance to help large and small, master meter, and LPG
operators implement the requirements of subpart P of Part 192. Guidance for large and
small operators begins at section I and for master meter and LPG operators at section V
of this document. We request comment on this draft guidance.
I. Guidance on Knowledge of the Distribution System Infrastructure
To understand the distribution system’s infrastructure an operator should know the
location of its system and the materials used in constructing the system and other
information such as location, material composition, piping sizes, construction methods,
date of installation, soil conditions, pressure (operating and design), operating experience,
performance data, condition of the system, and any other characteristics important to a
thorough understanding of applicable threats and their contribution to risks. Initially, an
operator may base this understanding on information the operator gained from past
design and operations. An operator should also understand how the pipeline system has
performed. Understanding the gas distribution system infrastructure is necessary to
understand the performance of a pipeline system. An operator should collect and retain
information concerning:
(1) Leakage;
(2) Corrosion;
(3) Cathodic protection trends;
(4) Evidence of material deterioration; and
2

<<<PAGE 3>>>

(5) Incidents.
II. Guidance on Leak Management
An effective leak management program should consider the following factors:
(1) How local conditions and system knowledge affect the frequency and type of leak
surveys.
(2) Methods/criteria for evaluating the severity of leaks and need for action.
(3) Records necessary to permit trending and identification of underlying problems.
(4) Performance metrics and the types of analyses in which they should be considered.
III. Guidance on Enhanced Damage Prevention
An effective damage prevention program may include the following elements:
(1) Establishing and maintaining effective communications between stakeholders from
receipt of an excavation notification until successful completion of the excavation.
(2) Supporting and partnering with stakeholders, including excavators, other operators,
locators, designers, and local government in damage prevention efforts.
(3) Reviewing the adequacy of internal performance measures regarding persons
performing locating services and quality assurance programs.
(4) Participating in the development and implementation of effective employee training
programs to ensure that operators, the one-call center, the enforcing agency, and the
excavators have partnered to design and implement training for the employees of
operators, excavators, and locators.
(5) Actively participating in public education for damage prevention activities.
3

<<<PAGE 4>>>

(6) Encouraging communication with state authorities to resolve issues.
(7) Developing a process to ensure full cooperation with state enforcement actions.
(8) Fostering and promoting the use of improving technologies that may enhance
communications, underground pipeline locating capability, and gathering and analyzing
information about the accuracy and effectiveness of locating programs.
(9) Reviewing and analyzing the effectiveness of each element of the enhanced damage
prevention program, including a means for implementing improvements identified by
such program reviews.
IV. Guidance on Pipe Replacement Programs
Pipe replacement programs, addressing those portions of a distribution pipeline system
presenting the highest risk, can be an effective risk management process.
V. Guidance for Master Meter and LPG Operators
Master meter and LPG distribution operators should consider the following actions to
assure the integrity of their distribution pipeline systems:
(1) Knowledge of system infrastructure
Identify the approximate location of system piping and equipment on maps, drawings, or
sketches using best-available information. Arrange to update the maps, drawings, or
sketches as better information about the location of the system becomes available through
other work (e.g., repairing leaks, excavations to install other utilities). Arrange to update
the maps, drawings, or sketches to show the kind of pipe and equipment (i.e., bare steel,
4

<<<PAGE 5>>>

galvanized steel, coated steel, copper, plastic, cast iron, line valves) and record data from
any new installations of pipe or equipment.
(2) Identify threats
Consider the following questions for each threat category and check all that apply. Each
threat category including at least one check will be considered a threat of concern to be
addressed under the distribution integrity management program.
(a) Corrosion
(i) Does the system consist of steel pipe that is not protected from corrosion (e.g.,
pipe that lacks coating, wrapping or galvanic protection?)
(ii) Does the system consist of non-steel pipe but include steel fittings or
connectors that are not protected from corrosion?
(iii) Does the system consist of cast iron pipe?
(b) Natural Forces
(i) Are exterior above-ground steel pipe/equipment not grounded (e.g., protected
from lightning)?
(ii) Are portions of the system susceptible to snow or ice slide impacting above
ground piping, meter and regulator sets, or meter header piping?
(iii) Are exterior above-ground portions of the system potentially subject to other
forces of nature (e.g., earthquakes, floods or waterway scouring, severe flooding
leading to uprooting of near-by trees) due to unique local weather conditions?
5

<<<PAGE 6>>>

(iv) Are buried portions of the system located in areas where soil movement or
subsidence is likely (e.g., earthquakes, landslide, flood-induced erosion)?
(c) Excavation Damage
(i) Are portions of the system buried in areas where digging might occur without
your knowledge or control?
(d) Other outside force damage
(i) Are exterior, above-ground portions of the system located in areas where they
could be subject to damage from vehicles or other expected activities?
(ii) Is the system located in an area with greater than usual exposure to the
possibility of wildfires?
(iii) Is there a history of vandalism to the pipeline system, or is the local area
subject
to vandalism of a kind that could damage the pipeline system?
(e) Material or welds
(i) Has any of your piping experienced frequent leakage?
(ii) Has the manufacturer of your piping or fittings (appurtenances) contacted you
regarding material defects?
(f) Equipment
6

<<<PAGE 7>>>

(i) Does the system include any equipment other than valves, meters, and service
regulators?
(g) Operations
(i) Does system operation require the manipulation of any equipment other than
valves that are permanently installed as part of the system?
(3) Evaluate and prioritize risk
The relative uniformity of master meter, LPG, and very small distribution systems makes
this element unnecessary.
(4) Identify and implement measures to mitigate risks
For all threats identified as threats of concern (where at least one box is checked in (2)
above) and for all parts of the system as described in (1) above, verify that actions are
being taken or requirements are in place intended to protect against the threat. This
should include, at a minimum, the actions required by Part 192, the following additional
general monitoring actions, and for each identified threat of concern the actions listed for
that threat:
(a) General Monitoring, additional patrols:
(i) For lines that have experienced problems in the past, periodically walk the
lines to identify at-risk pipe locations, and smell for signs of gas.
(ii) Periodically walk the lines to check for active excavation or signs of
excavation of which you were unaware.
7

<<<PAGE 8>>>

(b) Corrosion
(i) Coat and cathodically protect pipe installed after August 1, 1971.
(ii) Coat and cathodically protect all areas of pipe experiencing active
corrosion.
(iii) Annually monitor and test cathodic protection.
(iv) Inspect rectifiers six times per year.
(v) Annually inspect above-ground pipe.
(vi) Inspect buried pipe exposed by any digging for evidence of corrosion.
(c) Natural Forces
(i) Conduct more frequent patrols to identify conditions that may adversely
affect pipe or components.
(ii) Take actions to eliminate the hazard or reduce the threat.
(d) Excavation Damage
(i) Physically control access to the pipeline, or
(ii) Implement a damage prevention program including the following
elements:
(1) A means of receiving and recording notification of planned
excavation activities.
8

<<<PAGE 9>>>

(2) Requirements to locate and mark the pipe in areas where buried
piping exists and excavation is planned.
(3) Provision for actual notification of persons who give notice of their
intent to excavate in areas where buried pipe is located of the type of
temporary markings and how to identify them.
(4) Provision for inspection of pipelines during and after excavation if
the operator has reason to believe they could be damaged.
(e) Other outside force damage
(i) Identify portions of the system potentially subject to damage by signs
and/or distinctive colors.
(ii) Install vehicle barriers as appropriate.
(iii) Conduct patrols to identify at-risk pipe and components and mitigate the
risk to the pipe.
(f) Material or welds
(i) Replace small diameter cast iron pipe not adequately supported .
(ii) Replace brittle plastic pipe or other materials unsuitable for gas service.
(iii) Implement the recommended actions in any notice received from a
pipe/fitting manufacturer regarding material defects.
(iv) Monitor more frequently any portions of the system experiencing frequent
leakage.
9

<<<PAGE 10>>>

(v) Where the operator has a history of problems with pipe or fittings, replace
the pipe or fittings when practical (e.g., when excavations for other reasons
expose the pipe).
(g) Equipment
(i) Implement a program to qualify personnel who operate equipment under
49 CFR Part 192, Subpart N.
(h) Operations
(i) Implement a program to qualify personnel who operate equipment under
49 CFR Part 192, Subpart N.
(ii) Ensure personnel are aware of the precautions to take to prevent over-
pressuring a low pressure system, when stopping the flow of gas, and to
prevent unsafe gas-air mixtures.
(5) Measure performance, monitor results, and evaluate effectiveness
(a) Keep a record of the number of hazardous leaks either eliminated or repaired
including the date and the apparent cause of the leak.
(b) Keep a record of any instances in which the system is damaged by excavation.
10

<<<PAGE 11>>>

(c) Keep a record of the elimination of undesirable materials and components from the
gas system.
(d) Keep a record of the reduction in lost and unaccounted for gas.
(6) Continuing Evaluation and Improvement
Revise this checklist whenever changes are made to the system or significant changes
occur in the local environment to determine if threats of concern have been eliminated or
if new threats have been introduced. Modify the mitigative measures in paragraph (4) as
appropriate.
(7) Report results
Consistent with the exclusions in 49 CFR §191.9 (incident reports) and §191.11 (annual
reports), operators of master meter and LPG distribution systems need not report
performance measures.
11
- **truncated:** false
- **body characters:** 12290
