{"operation":"document","citation":"13-0068-DR-CE","title":"Guy’s Drum Service","source_type":"enforcement","agency":"Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration","status":"historical","official":true,"published_on":"2017-04-07","effective_on":null,"summary":"Orders of the Chief Counsel involving Guy’s Drum Service, reported 2017-04-07.","machine_formats":{"json":"https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-hazmat-enforcement-guys-drum-service-content.json","markdown":"https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-hazmat-enforcement-guys-drum-service-content.md"},"app_url":"https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-hazmat-enforcement-guys-drum-service-content","source_url":"https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/content/guys-drum-service","body":"Docket Number: PHMSA-2017-0035Respondent was assessed a civil penalty of $10,500 for five violations of the HMR when it reconditioned, represented, offered, and sold a packaging or container as meeting the requirements for a UN specification packaging, when a leakproofness was not performed as part of the reconditioning process; represented, marked, certified, reconditioned, and offered UN specification drums as meeting the requirements of the HMR, while failing to mark the reconditioned drums; represented, marked, certified, reconditioned, and offered UN specification drums as meeting the requirements of the HMR, while failing to mark the reconditioned drums; represented and offered composite Intermediate Bulk Containers, marked as \"UN31HA1,\" as meeting the requirements of the HMR, when the packagings were not marked as being subjected to routine maintenance; and it offered UN specification packagings or containers for sale while allowing an employee to perform a function subject to the requirements of the HMR, while failing to provide general awareness, function-specific, and security awareness training.","truncated":false,"body_characters":1123}