{"operation":"document","citation":"13-0112-SC-SO","title":"Industrial Research Corporation","source_type":"enforcement","agency":"Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration","status":"historical","official":true,"published_on":"2020-05-03","effective_on":null,"summary":"Orders of the Chief Counsel involving Industrial Research Corporation, reported 2020-05-03.","machine_formats":{"json":"https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-hazmat-enforcement-industrial-research-corporation-content.json","markdown":"https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-hazmat-enforcement-industrial-research-corporation-content.md"},"app_url":"https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-hazmat-enforcement-industrial-research-corporation-content","source_url":"https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/content/industrial-research-corporation","body":"Docket Number: PHMSA-2019-0088 Respondent was assessed a civil penalty of $7,200 for three violations of the HMR when it offered for transportation, in commerce, a quantity of a material poisonous by inhalation, as defined in § 171.8 of the HMR, (UN1017, Chlorine, 2.3 (5.1, 8), PIH), as prescribed by 49 C.F.R. 172.800, without developing a written security plan; it offered for transportation, in commerce, a hazardous material (UN1017, Chlorine, 2.3 (5.1, 8), PIH), in a quantity requiring placarding, without registering with PHMSA; and it failed to create and retain current records of hazmat training as prescribed by 49 C.F.R. § 172.704(d).","truncated":false,"body_characters":647}