{"operation":"document","citation":"13-0037-PM-CE","title":"Lomack Drum Company","source_type":"enforcement","agency":"Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration","status":"historical","official":true,"published_on":"2016-08-10","effective_on":null,"summary":"Orders of the Chief Counsel involving Lomack Drum Company, reported 2016-08-10.","machine_formats":{"json":"https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-hazmat-enforcement-lomack-drum-company-content.json","markdown":"https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-hazmat-enforcement-lomack-drum-company-content.md"},"app_url":"https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-hazmat-enforcement-lomack-drum-company-content","source_url":"https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/content/lomack-drum-company","body":"Docket Order: PHMSA-2016-0052Respondent was assessed a civil penalty of $11,800 for four violations of the HMR when it represented, marked, certified, and offered specification UN 1A2/Y and UN 1A1/Y steel drums as being reconditioned when the drums had not been leakproofness tested and cleaned to the base material, and restored to their original shape and contour; represented and offered steel drums marked UN 1A2/Y and UN 1A1/Y as meeting the requirements of the HMR, while failing to ensure the packaging contained legible specification markings; represented and offered steel drums marked UN 1A2/Y and UN 1A1/Y as meeting the requirements of the HMR, while failing to ensure the packaging contained legible specification markings; and it represented, marked, certified and sold reconditioned steel drums, marked UN 1A1/Y and UN 1A2/Y, as meeting the requirements of the HMR while allowing an employee to perform a function subject to the requirements of the HMR when hazardous materials training records were not created and retained.","truncated":false,"body_characters":1040}