# Honeywell — Hazardous Materials Safety Interpretation - **operation:** document - **citation:** 00-0049 - **title:** Honeywell — Hazardous Materials Safety Interpretation - **source type:** guidance - **agency:** Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration - **status:** guidance - **official:** true - **published on:** 2000-02-29 - **effective on:** Not available - **summary:** 00-0049 response to Honeywell concerning 177.834. - **machine formats:** - **json:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-00-0049.json - **markdown:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-00-0049.md - **app url:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-00-0049 - **source url:** https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretation%20Files/2000/000049.pdf **body:** <<>> of Transportation U.S. Department 400 Seventh Street, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20590 Research and Special Programs Administration FEB 2 9 2000 Mr Jeffrey A. Leese Honeywell Ref. No. 00-0049 101 Columbia Road Morristown, New Jersey 07962 Dear Mr. Leese: This responds to your letter of February 2, 2000, concerning requirements for attending the unloading of cargo tank motor vehicles under the Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR; 49 CFR Parts 171- 180). Specifically, you ask whether attendance requirements apply when a cargo tank has been placed on private property at the consignee's location and the motive power has been removed. The answer is no. Under § 177.834(i)(2), a cargo tank unloading operation need not be attended when the cargo tank has been placed on the consignee's premises and the motive power has been removed from the cargo tank and removed from the premises. As defined by federal hazardous materials transportation law (49 U.S.C. 5101-5127), "transportation" means the iovement of property and loading, unloading, or storage incidental to the movement. : Neither the statute nor the HMR define the terms "loading incidental to movement," "unloading incidental to movement," or "storage incidental to movement." You are correct that there is confusion concerning the meaning of "transportation in commerce" and whether particular activities are covered by that term and, therefore, subject to regulation under the MR. Current exceptions for cargo tank unloading operations that are conducted on private property at a consignee's location when the motive power is removed are as stated in the February 13, 1998 and March 11, 1999 letters you cite, i.e., "not subject to the attendance requirements." In Docket No. RSPA-98-4952, we are reconsidering the general rule that transportation in commerce is complete when a hazardous material is delivered to a consignee's location and the delivering carrier has physically tendered the material to the consignee by: 000049 <<>> • unloading or disconnecting a trailer or cargo tank for unloading by the consignee. Copies of the two advance notices of proposed rulemaking issued under HM-223 are enclosed for your information. I hope this information is helpful. If you have further questions, please do not hesitate:to contact this office. Sincerely, Edward T. Mazzull Director, Office of Hazardous Materials Standards Enclosures <<>> Honeywell P.O. Box 1057 Honeywell Morristown, NJ 07962-1057 Gorske $177.834 February 2, 2000 00-0049 Mr. Edward Mazzullo Director, Office of Hazardous Materials Standards DHM-10 Research and Special Projects Administration 400 Seventh Street SW Washington, DC 20590-0001 RE: 49 CFR 177.834(i) Cargo Tank Loading/Unloading Attendance Dear Mr. Mazzullo: In researching the need for physical or remote monitoring of a cargo tank during loading or unloading of a hazardous material, I have found two (2) letters of clarification which give diametrically opposite guidance. Assuming the cargo tank has been spotted on private property at a consignee's location and assuming the motive power has been removed from the trailer and removed from the : premises: 2/13/98 - Delmar F. Billings to Dana Murphy - the trailer in no longer "in transportation" and not subject to the attendance requirements 3/11/99 - Thomas G. Allan to Robert Monteith - the trailer is still considered to be "in transportation" (and is subject to the attendance requirements of the HMR). On Feb 2id, I spoke to Ms. Eileen Mack at the DOT Hazardous Materials Information Center in an attempt to resolve this conflict. She stated the DOT position was that while the definition of a trailer "in transportation" was currently being developed (in Docket RSPA 98-4952); there is currently no language in the HMR specifically addressing this issue. As a result, no violation of the HMR could occur if a cargo tank was loaded or unloaded without DOT defined attendance, assuming the trailer was placed on the consignee's premises and the motive power was removed from the cargo tank and removed from the premises. <<>> : We are seeking written confirmation of this position. Please address all correspondence or feel free to contact me at: Jeffrey A. Leese Honeywell : 101 Columbia Road Morristown, NJ 07962 Phone: 973-455-6794 FAX: 973-455-5391 Regards, files i leese Jeffrey A. Leese Manager Regulatory Affairs. - **truncated:** false - **body characters:** 4417