# The Compliance Center Inc — Hazardous Materials Safety Interpretation - **operation:** document - **citation:** 01-0167 - **title:** The Compliance Center Inc — Hazardous Materials Safety Interpretation - **source type:** guidance - **agency:** Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration - **status:** guidance - **official:** true - **published on:** 2001-10-31 - **effective on:** Not available - **summary:** 01-0167 response to The Compliance Center Inc concerning 178.60. - **machine formats:** - **json:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-01-0167.json - **markdown:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-01-0167.md - **app url:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-01-0167 - **source url:** https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretation%20Files/2001/010167.pdf **body:** <<>> of Transportation U.S. Department 400 Seventh St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20590 Research and OCT 3 1 2001 Special Programs Administration Ms. Dawn M. Anderson The Compliance Center Inc Ref. No. 01-0167 2150 Liberty Drive Niagara Falls, NY 14304 Dear Ms. Anderson: This responds to your June 22, 2001 letter requesting clarification of requirements for cushioning material used in packagings manufactured in accordance with Variation 2 in § 178.601(g)(2) of the Hazardous Material Regulations (HMR; 49 CFR Parts 171-180). Specifically, you asked if your understanding is correct that cushioning material used in Variation 2 packagings must be such that: 1) the thickness of cushioning material surrounding each inner packaging is at least as great as the thickness of the cushioning material in the originally tested packaging; 2) if the inner packagings contain liquids, the absorbent material must be capable of absorbing the entire liquid contents of the inner packaging, and must be placed in a leakproof liner; 3) the cushioning material must be compatible with the contents of the inner packagings; and 4) any suitable cushioning material may be used, if it meets the requirements of items 1 through 3 above, and the gross weight of the completed packaging does not exceed the marked gross weight of the packaging certified under Variation 2. Your understanding is correct. In accordance with the requirements for packagings under Variation 2, as specified in § 178.601(g)(2), the thickness of cushioning material between inner packagings and between inner packagings and the outside of the packaging may not be reduced below the corresponding thickness in the originally tested packaging. When a single inner packaging was used in the original test, the thickness of cushioning between inner packagings may not be less than the thickness of cushioning between the outside of the packaging and the inner packaging in the original test. When either fewer or smaller inner packagings are used, sufficient additional cushioning material must be utilized to take up void spaces. I hope this satisfies your inquiry. If we can be of further assistance, please contact us. Sincerely, mn Billio Delmer F. Billings Chief, Standards Development Office of Hazardous Materials Standards 178.60 010167 - <<>> engrum June 28, 2001 :$|78.601 Mr. Edward Mazzullo The Director tackaging Compliance US Department of Transportation Office of Hazardous Materials Standards - DHM-10 51-0167 Center Inc. 400 Seventh Street, S.W. Washington, DC 20590 Dear Mr. Mazzullo: I am writing as a follow up to my recent conversation with Diane LaValle regarding Variation 2 packaging. As a packaging manufacturer, ICC The Compliance Center, Inc. is committed to doing everything we can to ensure that our customers are in compliance with the regulations for the transportation of hazardous materials. One question we are repeatedly asked is related to the cushioning material used in Variation 2 packagings. Our Variation 2 packagings are tested using vermiculite. Some customers, particularly those shipping items like aerosol cans (which must be in specification packagings for international shipment by air) want to substitute an alternative cushioning material, such as Styrofoam peanuts. Since compressed gasses do not require absorbent material, as long as the thickness of the cushioning is maintained (and it is compatible with the contents) Ms. LaValle indicated that this was an acceptable practice. I would like to obtain written confirmation of what I understand to be the intent of Variation 2, in regards to cushioning materials. The amount of cushioning used must be such that the thickness of cushioning surrounding each inner packaging or article is at least as great as the thickness of the cushioning in the originally tested packaging If the inner packagings contain liquids, the cushioning material must be capable of and the inner packagings must be placed in a leakproof liner. absorbing the entire liquid contents of the inner packaging. In this case, the absorbent 3. The cushioning material must be compatible with the contents of the inner packagings, 4. Any suitable cushioning material may be utilized, as long as it meets items 1 through 3 above, and the gross weight of the completed package does not exceed the marked gross weight on the variation 2 packaging. Thank you for your attention to this matter, I look forward to receiving your resposne. Sincerely, DaunMAnderson Dawn M. Anderson Regulatory Specialist Texas: 10620 Stebbins Circle, Suite D • Houston, TX 77043 • PH: 713-722-0035 FX: 713-722-0026 New York: 2150 Liberty Drive • Niagara Falis, NY 14304 • PH: 716-283-0002 FX: 716-283-0119 USA Customer Service 888-442-9628 Visit our website at www.thecompliancecenter.com - **truncated:** false - **body characters:** 4808