{"operation":"document","citation":"02-0169","title":"National Cargo Bureau, Inc. — Hazardous Materials Safety Interpretation","source_type":"guidance","agency":"Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration","status":"guidance","official":true,"published_on":"2002-09-23","effective_on":null,"summary":"02-0169 response to National Cargo Bureau, Inc. concerning 176.3.","machine_formats":{"json":"https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-02-0169.json","markdown":"https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-02-0169.md"},"app_url":"https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-02-0169","source_url":"https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretation%20Files/2002/020169.pdf","body":"<<<PAGE 1>>>\n\nUS.Department\nof Transportation\nD0 Seventh Street, S.\nashington. D\n20590\nResearch and\nSpecial Programs\nAdministration\nSEP 2 3 2002\nNational Cargo Bureau,\nCaptain Sam Rogers 3\n::Ref. No. 02-0169\n17 Battery Place Suite\n1232\nInc.\nNew York, NY\n10004\nDear Captain Rogers:\nThis is in response to your June 11, 2002 letter regarding the\ndangerous cargo manifest requirements.\nthe required signature specified in $ 176.30 (b):of the Hazardous\nSpecifically, you ask if\nMaterials Regulations (HMR; 49 CFR Parts 171-180) must be that of\nrepresents.\nthe individual or the company name for whom the individual\nThe signature specified in § 176:30 (b) must be that of the\nindividual who certifies that the information on the dangerous\ncargo manifest is accurate.\nsatisfy the signature requirement of $ 176.30 (b).….\nThe name of the company will not\nI hope this satisfies your request.\nSincerely,\npes\noffice of Hazardous Materials Standards\nRegulations Specialist\n.'':\n020169\n176,30\n\n<<<PAGE 2>>>\n\nJun 11 02 09:17a\nNational Cargo Bureau Inc\np .1\nNATIONAL\nSCARGO\nMAIN (212) 785-8300\niNC.\nBUREAU\nnebnyc@natcargo.org\nFAX\n(212) 785-8333\nBAH\nSent via Facsimile\n171.1\n176:30(b)\nU.S. Dept. of Transportation\nDetinition Vessel\nRSPA, DHM-10\nMr. Edward Mazzullo, Director\nOffice of Hazardous Materials Standards\n02 - 816\nRe.:\nLetter of Inferpretation / Opinion\nDear Mr. Mazzullo,\n49 CFR, Parts 100-185. In particular, section §176.30 of Part 176, for Carriage by Vessel.\nI write to you requesting clarity of the below described section of the HMR, Title\nOur question is specific to the signature requirement contained in §176,30(b), which state\nin the second sentence The person who supervises the preparation of the manifest, list,\nsignature and notation of the date prepared.\"\nor stowage plan shall ensure that the ... to the best of his knowledge and belief by his\nThe question arises where \"the person\" identified in §176.30(b) for the required\nsignature by the preparer of the Dangerous Cargo Manifest, can this be interpreted to\nree ped in 2204cdia dia 17118 o-sidoes this requirement specify an individual\" as\nnean \"person\"\nThanking you in advance for any clarity you may provide us on this issue, and as always,\nBest regards,\nSam Rogu\nMaster Mariner\nCapt. Sam Rogers\nNational Cargo Bureau, Inc.\nCC.\nMr. Manny Pfersich, USCG\n17 BATTERY PLACE • SUITE 1232 • NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10004","truncated":false,"body_characters":2376}