# Q/C Resource — Hazardous Materials Safety Interpretation

- **operation:** document
- **citation:** 02-0294
- **title:** Q/C Resource — Hazardous Materials Safety Interpretation
- **source type:** guidance
- **agency:** Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
- **status:** guidance
- **official:** true
- **published on:** 2003-03-18
- **effective on:** Not available
- **summary:** 02-0294 response to Q/C Resource concerning 172.201.
- **machine formats:** - **json:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-02-0294.json
- **markdown:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-02-0294.md
- **app url:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-02-0294
- **source url:** https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretation%20Files/2002/020294.pdf
**body:**

<<<PAGE 1>>>

of Transportation
U.S. Department
400 Seventh St., S.W.
Research and
Washington, D.C. 20590
Administration
Special Programs
MAR 18 2003
Mr. Philip C. Palilla
President
Ref. No. 02-0294
Q/C Resource
16 Taunton Lake Road
Newtown, CT 06470
Dear Mr. Palilla:
This responds to your November 6, 2002 letter requesting clarification on the retention of shipping
papers under the Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR; 49 CFR Parts 171-180). Specifically, you
request that an exception be granted for shipping sealed source radioactive materials in devices/gauges.
In your letter, you stated that your company ships portable sealed source radioactive materials in
devices/gauges and that the shipping paper retention requirements under the HMR would adversely
affect your company. You also stated that your company uses and maintains records required by the
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) including shipping papers and daily records of shipments, etc.
You also stated that you did not comment on the notice of proposed rulemaking or the final rule
published in the Federal Register under Docket No. HM-207B, "Retention of Shipping Papers."
The requirement to retain hazardous materials shipping papers for one year has been a self-executing
requirement under the Federal hazardous materials transportation law (Federal hazmat law) since
August 1994. (See 49 U.S.C. § 5110(e))). The final rule published under Docket No. HM-207B (67
FR 46123) amended the HMR to require shippers and carriers to retain a copy of each hazardous
material shipping paper, or an electronic image thereof, for a period of 375 days after the date the
hazardous material is accepted by the carrier. The July 12, 2002 final rule incorporated into the HMR
the statutory requirement from the Federal hazmat law.
After publication of the final rule on July 12, 2002, there was a 30-day period in which to file an
appeal. We received five appeals to the final rule. On November 1, 2002, we published a final rule;
response to appeals (67 FR 66571). In this response to appeals, we provided relief to the air and
vessel modes of transportation, similar to that we provided to rail shipments regarding the date on the
shipping paper. We removed the word "immediately" from the requirement to make copies of the
shipping papers available to officials upon request. This response to appeals was effective on
November 1, 2002, with voluntary compliance authorized as of August 12, 2002, the effective date of
the final rule.
172,201(e)
020294

<<<PAGE 2>>>

The final rule provides relief to those persons using a "permanent"shipping document to accompany a
hazardous material shipment, e.g., gasoline or sealed source radioactive devices/gauges. When
"permanent" shipping papers are used, we allow retention of daily shipping or inventory receipts
instead of the same shipping paper on a daily basis. As stated in the final rule, we believe that retention,
including electronic retention, of daily shipping or inventory receipts which are used in the normal course
of business instead of the retention of the same shipping paper used for multiple daily shipments of the
same hazardous material already provides adequate relief for companies.
I hope this answers your inquiry.
Sincerely,
Delmer F. Billings
Chief, Standards Development
Office of Hazardous Materials Standards,

<<<PAGE 3>>>

Boothe
Q/C
RESOURCE
8172.201(e) Fax 803-426-6980
Fax 203-426-6722
Shipping Papers
November 6, 2002
02-0294
Office of Hazardous Materials
US DOT
Standards Dept.
400 Seventh Street SW
Washington, DC 20590
Re: Letter of Interpretation Requested
[49 CFR 172:201(e)] - Retention of Shipping Papers, Hazardous
Materials, HM-207B
To Whom it May Concern:
As an instructor of Radiation Safety Classes and 49 CFR 172
requirements for portable sealed source devices for 19 years, this new
procedure will be a logistic / paperwork nightmare for thousands of
companies that utilize these gauges. Although I heard this new
regulation was initially mailed out for comment, I don't believe anyone
in this industry of construction materials testing for density and
moisture was informed of such proposals or realized the ramifications.
We are all aware of the need for tracking "Hazardous Materials"
especially by commercial carriers, but these gauges are transported in
company or personal vehicles, and also fall under the category of
Type A Packages which are non-life endangering amounts of
radioactive material. The individual licensees are already required by
the USNRC and Agreement States to complete and keep on file daily
inventory sheets of the destination and operator of each gauge along
with the required shipping papers visible in the front seat. They include
an Emergency Response Document and a properly completed Bill of
Lading (presently the bill of lading in itself does not have to be date
specific but must accurately describe the contents).
16 Taunton Lake Road
Newtown, CT 06470

<<<PAGE 4>>>

Q/C
Phone 800-996-8880
RESOURCE
Fax 203-426-6722
Individual companies in this industry can very easily have 5 to 30
gauges out on a daily basis working at "numerous" jobsites, whereas
this new requirement for a record of EACH shipment and retained for
375 days is literally a nightmare. I implore you to modify this
requirement through an exception for said devices and simultaneously
be assured that the inventory procedures currently required stil!
address the continuing need for control, safety and inventory.
Respectfully,
Philip C. Palilla
President
Q/C Resource
16 Taunton Lake Road
Newtown, CT 06470
- **truncated:** false
- **body characters:** 5575
