# The RxFire Company — Hazardous Materials Safety Interpretation

- **operation:** document
- **citation:** 03-0256
- **title:** The RxFire Company — Hazardous Materials Safety Interpretation
- **source type:** guidance
- **agency:** Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
- **status:** guidance
- **official:** true
- **published on:** 2003-12-08
- **effective on:** Not available
- **summary:** 03-0256 response to The RxFire Company concerning 173.4.
- **machine formats:** - **json:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-03-0256.json
- **markdown:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-03-0256.md
- **app url:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-03-0256
- **source url:** https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretation%20Files/2003/030256.pdf
**body:**

<<<PAGE 1>>>

U.S. Department
DEC
8 2003
Research and
of Transportation
400 Seventh St., S.W.
Washington, D.C. 20590
Administrations
ForesTech
Mr. Peter Nopper
Reference No.: 03-0256
The RxFire Company
335 Palo Verde Drive
Leesburg, FL 34748
Dear Mr. Nopper:
This is in response to your letter concerning the small quantity exceptions under the Hazardous
Materials Regulations (HMR; 49 CFR Parts 171-180). You ask if a small quantity (29 g) of a
It is the opinion of this office, that the packaging you describe is an acceptable inner packaging
for a small quantity of fused flammable solid, provided the foil is securely closed to prevent the
escape of any material.
I trust this satisfies your inquiry.
Sincerely,
Thotte z. mitchel
Hattie L. Mitchell
Chief, Regulatory Review and Reinvention
Office of Hazardous Materials Standards
030256
193.4
224:3

<<<PAGE 2>>>

FORESTECH
Corbin
335 PALOVERDE DRIVE LEESBURG FL 34748
$113.4 (a) E)(ir)
Exceptionstor
Waste
October 9, 2003
03-0256
Edward Muzzullo
Office of Hazmat Standards
USDOT-RSPA, DHM-10
400 7th. St. SW
Washington DC 20590
Re: Clarification of 49 CFR 173.4 (a) (2) (ii)
Dear Mr. Muzzullo,
In a recent phone conversation with an Information Specialist regarding the above ("Is
constructed of plastic having a minimum thickness of no less than 0.2 mm (0.008 inch),
or earthenware, glass, or metal;"), as no dimension is given for an inner receptacle
constructed of metal, he indicated that a metal foil would meet the requirement.
However, as Dr. Cushman has noted, sometimes things get lost between the cup and the
to ship a Class 3, Division 4.1, fused flammable solid to the U.S. Forest Service and other
lip. Consequently I am contacting your office for a written verification of this. We wish
qualified fire fighting agencies. Thank you for your clarification.
Sincerely,
Peter Nopper
The RxFire Company, dba ForesTech
352-360-1114
forestech@rxfire.us
- **truncated:** false
- **body characters:** 1914
