# McCarthy, Sweeney & Harkaway, P.C. — Hazardous Materials Safety Interpretation

- **operation:** document
- **citation:** 04-0038
- **title:** McCarthy, Sweeney & Harkaway, P.C. — Hazardous Materials Safety Interpretation
- **source type:** guidance
- **agency:** Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
- **status:** guidance
- **official:** true
- **published on:** 2003-05-09
- **effective on:** Not available
- **summary:** 04-0038 response to McCarthy, Sweeney & Harkaway, P.C. concerning 178.320.
- **machine formats:** - **json:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-04-0038.json
- **markdown:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-04-0038.md
- **app url:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-04-0038
- **source url:** https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretation%20Files/2004/040038.pdf
**body:**

<<<PAGE 1>>>

US.Department
of Transportation
Office of the
Chief Counsel
Seven St SW
Washington. D.C 20590
Research and
Special Programs
Administration
Lawrence W. Bierlein, Esq.
MAY - 9 2003
Suite 600
McCarthy, Sweeney & Harkaway, P.C.
Ref. No. 04-0038
2175 K Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20037
Dear Mr. Bierlein:
This responds to your request for a retraction of a letter of interpretation issued by the
Research and Special Programs Administration's Office of Hazardous Materials Standards
(OHMS) concerning the definition under the Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR; 49
CFR Parts 171-180) of a "manufacturer" of a cargo tank, cargo tank motor vehicle, or cargo
tank equipment that forms part of the cargo tank wall. Specifically, you suggest that OHMS
erred when it interpreted the definition to include persons who attach a cargo tank to a motor
vehicle by strapping or other means that do not involve welding to the cargo tank wall.
The definition in question is contained in § 178.320(a) of the HMR. The definition reads as
follows:
Manufacturer means any person engaged in the manufacture of a DOT
specification cargo tank, cargo tank motor vehicle, or cargo tank equipment
which forms part of the cargo tank wall. This term includes attaching a cargo
tank to a motor vehicle or to a motor vehicle suspension component which
involves welding on the cargo tank will. A manufacturer shall register with the
Department in accordance with subpart F of part 107 in subchapter A of this
chapter.
As your letter notes, the definition was most recently revised in 1996 under a final rule
issued under Docket HM-189M. The preamble to the HM-189M final rule stated that the
definition was revised to clarify that the term does not include persons (assemblers) who
attach a cargo tank to the motor vehicle or to motor vehicle component if no welding to the
040038
178.320

<<<PAGE 2>>>

2
I agree that the definition for "manufacturer" in § 178.320(a) when read alongside the 1996
preamble language is ambiguous and confusing, at best. For this reason, RSPA will
York State Police. We will address the ambiguity of the current definition in a future
withdraw the October 21, 2002 interpretation addressed to Sergeant Eric C. Adair, New
rulemaking.
Sincerely,
Nancy E. Machado
Assistant Chief Counsel
for Hazardous Materials Safety

<<<PAGE 3>>>

LAWRENGE W. BIERLEIN
LAW OFFICES
JOHN M. CUTLER, JF
DOUGLAS M. CANTEr
MCCARTHY, SWEENEY. & HARKAWAY, P.C.
SUITE 600
202) 775-557
FACSIMILI
STEVEN J. KALISH
ANDREW P. GOLDSTEIN
2175 K STREET, N.W.
CHANNING D. STROTHER, JR.
RICHARD D. LIEBERMAN
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20037
MSH@MSHPC.COM
E-MAIL
(202) 775-5560
WEBSITE
KAREN R. O'BRIEN
OF COUNSEL
hTtp://ww.MSHPC.coM
March 21, 2003
Nancy Machado, Esq.
Office of Chief Counsel (DCC-10)
1032310)
Research & Special Programs Administration
U.S. Department of Transportation
400 Seventh Street, SW
Washington, DC 20590
835
Dear Ms. Machado:
like you to review the attached documents and as counsel ultimately retract a
On behalf of the National Propane Gas Association, Inc. (NPGA), I would
letter of clarification issued by Regulations.
On October 21, 2002, endeavoring to respond to an inquiry from a State
enforcement official, Del Billings wrote the attached letter (Ref. No. 02-0257). In
this letter, he concluded that a person "who removes an existing MC331 cargo
tank from a chassis and places it on a new chassis, by means of strapping or
welding or non-welding methods, meets the definition of a manufacturer," as that
term is defined in 49 CFR 178.320(a)(Italics added). I understand there was
considerable pressure to get this letter out in a hurry.
The rulemaking record for Section 178.320(a), however, shows the letter
to be in error. Specifically, in HM-189M (61 Fed Reg. 51334, 51335; Oct. 1,
his term does not include persons (asseinblers) who attach a cargo tank to the
1996), DOT stated: "The definition for 'Manufacturer' is revised to clarify that
motor vehicle, or to a motor vehicle component if it involves no welding on the
cargo tank wall." (Italics. added.)
series of ripple effects in Parts 107, 173, 178, and 180. The only appropriate
tank wall were a "manufacturer," this reading of the regulation would have a
mechanism for such a significant change is notice-and-comment rilemaking.

<<<PAGE 4>>>

We do not need a new letter of clarification, because to us the rule is clear
as it stands. What we do need and request, however, is an explicit retraction of
the letter and removal of the letter from the RSPA web site where it now appears.
Please contact me if you have any questions on this request.
Sincerely,
For eatin
- **truncated:** false
- **body characters:** 4638
