# International Association of Fire Chiefs — Hazardous Materials Safety Interpretation - **operation:** document - **citation:** 04-0132 - **title:** International Association of Fire Chiefs — Hazardous Materials Safety Interpretation - **source type:** guidance - **agency:** Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration - **status:** guidance - **official:** true - **published on:** 2004-06-15 - **effective on:** Not available - **summary:** 04-0132 response to International Association of Fire Chiefs concerning 172.500, 172.800. - **machine formats:** - **json:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-04-0132.json - **markdown:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-04-0132.md - **app url:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-04-0132 - **source url:** https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretation%20Files/2004/040132.pdf **body:** <<>> of Transportation U.S. Department 400 Seventh St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20590 Research and Special Programs Administration JUN 15 2004 Chief Ernest Mitchell President Ref. No. 04-0132 International Association of Fire Chiefs 4025 Fair Ridge Drive Fairfax, VA 22033-2868 Dear Chief Mitchell: This responds to your May 7, 2004 letter addressed to the Honorable Thomas J. Ridge, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS), with a copy to the Secretary of Transportation Norman Y. Mineta, expressing your strong support for maintaining the use of the current hazard warning placards for shipments of hazardous materials until a replacement system has been demonstrated to be effective and the fire service has been trained in its use. Your letter was referred to me for response. As you know, in response to concerns that placards could be used by terrorists or criminals to identify potential targets, the Research and Special Programs Administration transportation safety and security. The study took into account the views of all (RSPA) on January 15, 2003, completed a study of the role placards play for stakeholders, including IAFC, through working group meetings. The study concluded that the existing placarding system should be retained, but that we should continue to review the use of alternatives to placards in specific high-risk situations, as well as for broad application. In considering potential changes to the placarding requirements as impact on costs, training and international trade that could result from changes in the part of its continuing review, the study further concluded that we should consider the current placarding requirements. (The study can be found on our website at http://hazmat.dot.gov/pubtrain/003RcdactedPlacardingReportSSI.pdf.) In addition, the DHS is conducting a study to examine alternative methods for communicating the hazards of hazardous materials transported in rail tank cars. The study will identify 10 alternatives to placarding for communicating hazards and will include operational testing of the alternatives identified. The evaluation of the alternatives will include: (1) technical considerations, such as the speed and accuracy of the systems and the interoperability of the systems with those currently in use by the emergency response community; (2) international transportation issues, such as the impact on international rail transportation between the United States and Canada and Mexico; (3) the costs associated with the alternatives, including installation, start-up, and consideration of small urban and rural volunteer first responders; and (4) the speed with system maintenance costs, as well as cost of training the users, showing particular 040132 $112.500 172.800 <<>> which the alternatives can be implemented, including the time required to train first responders to use the new technology. DHS expects to complete the study by the end of 2004. Effective hazard cornmunication is critical to the ability of emergency response personnel to handle transportation accidents involving hazardous materials. Let me assure you that consideration of all the potential impacts, especially the potential impacts on emergency DOT will propose no change to the current placarding system without careful response and those responsible for planning for and responding to hazardous materials transportation accidents. Thank you for your letter. Please feel free to contact me if you have questions or need additional information. Sincerely, This lyles Frits Wybenga Deputy Associate Administrator Office of Hazardous Materials Safety <<>> May-07-2004 15:51 From-INTL ASSN OF FIRE CHIEFS +7032739363 T-330 P.002/002 F-269 International Association of Fire Chiefs 4025 Fair Ridge Drive • Fairfax, VA 22033-2868 Telephone: (703) 273-0911 Fax: (703) 273-9363 7 May 2004 Internet: www.iafc.org Honorable Thomas J. Ridge Boothe Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security $172.500 Washington, DC 20528 U.S. Department of Homeland Security Via facsimile: 2022828401 72.800 Dear Secretary Ridge, Sacrity Placardin Over the last year, the International Association of Fire Chiefs (IAFC) has heard persistent rumors that 04-0/34 the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) intends to remove hazardous materials placards from rail cars for security reasons. In our business, we understand that often, where there's smoke, there's fire. The AFC supports the current placarding system and works closely with the Research and Special Programs Administration (RSPA) of the Department of Transportation to administer that system. While we appreciate the security risks associated with hazardous materials transportation, we oppose the effective and the fire service has been fully trained in its use. termination of the current placarding system until a replacement system has been demonstrated to be There are nearly one million shipments of hazardous materials each day in the United States. While the overwhelming majority of these shipments reach their destination safely, some spill or catch fire. It is imperative that emergency responders be able to quickly and accurately identify these materials in order to safely clean up the hazard and protect thernselves, local citizens, nearby property, and the environment. trained on handling hazardous materials incidents with the Norsh American Emergency Response Guide This is an everyday safety issue for America's fire service. For nearly two decades the fire service has (ERG) which depends on placards for identification of the substances involved. Firefighters and other emergency responders do not have universal access to sophisticated electronic and software programs to identify hazardous materials. Most fire departments, especially small and rural departments which are mostly volunteer, still rely on visual placards for their own safety and the protection of the citizenry. current placard system is completely ingrained in our response mechanism. Withour it, first responders Secretary Ridge, public safety rests on the actions and knowledge of emergency first responders. The request a response to this letter so the IAFC can inform America's fire service of the exact status of this and the public we are sworn to protect will be endangered. Because of the importance of this issue, I crucial issue. This is not an issue that can be appropriately decided by administrative fiat. Please call me if you require additional information on this extremely important issue. I look forward to hearing from you. Very truly yours, Bathrobed? Chief Emest Mitchell President /mws cc: Norman Y. Minera, Secretary of Transportation Providing lealership jar che fire and emergency services since (873 Member; International echnical Committee for the Prevention and Exinction of Fire/Curité Technique International De Prevertion E‹ D'Exinction Du Feu (CTIF) - **truncated:** false - **body characters:** 6902