# ARUP Laboratories — Hazardous Materials Safety Interpretation

- **operation:** document
- **citation:** 04-0216
- **title:** ARUP Laboratories — Hazardous Materials Safety Interpretation
- **source type:** guidance
- **agency:** Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
- **status:** guidance
- **official:** true
- **published on:** 2004-11-18
- **effective on:** Not available
- **summary:** 04-0216 response to ARUP Laboratories concerning 171.8, 172.203.
- **machine formats:** - **json:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-04-0216.json
- **markdown:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-04-0216.md
- **app url:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-04-0216
- **source url:** https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretation%20Files/2004/040216.pdf
**body:**

<<<PAGE 1>>>

400 Seventh St., S.W.
Washington, D.C. 20590
NOV 18 2004
Mr. Paul Brinton
Reference No. 04-0216
Vice President, Transportation & Logistics
ARUP Laboratories
500 Chipeta Way
Salt Lake City, Utah 84108
Dear Mr. Brinton:
This is in further response to your August 27, 2004 e-mail concerning how to properly
describe and label an unknown fungus suspected of being an infectious substance under
the Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR; 49 CFR Parts 171-180). We responded to
your e-ma: I in a letter dated September 20, 2004.
In your August 27 e-mail, you stated that you are shipping an unknown fungus suspected
"fungus" raay be used to meet the requirements for a technical name in accordance with
of being an infectious substance to a laboratory for testing. You asked if the term
response, ive suggested that you use the term "mycotic species" as the technical name to
§§ 171.8, 72.101(b)(4), and 172.203(k) of the HMR. In our September 20, 2004
complete the generic shipping description for the suspected infectious substance. In a
community uses the terms "fungus" and "mycotic species" interchangeably and defines
September 23, 2004 e-mail responding to our letter, you note that the sciertific
"mycotic" to mean "... infection with or disease caused by a fungus."
Based on the information you provided, we agree that either "fungus" or "mycotic
species" may be used to comply with the technical name requirements in § 172.101(b)(4)
for transportation of an unknown fungus described and classed as an "Infectious
substance, affecting humans, 6.2, UN 2814."
We note concerning the shipping description of unknown samples of hazardous materials
your sample a tentative proper shipping name, hazard class, identification number, and
being transported for testing that, in accordance with § 172.101(c)(11), you may assign
packing group, if applicable, and offer it for transportation for testing to determine its
hazard class. You must assign a proper shipping name based on your knowledge of the
material ard the hazard precedence prescribed in § 173.2a. In addition, if the word
"sample" is not already included in the proper shipping name, you must add it to the
proper shipping name or place it in close proximity to the basic shipping description.
Thus, for the fungus you are shipping, the shipping description would be "Sample
infectious substance, affecting humans, 6.2, UN 2814." For samples transported in
accordance with this section, the provisions requiring a technical name for the
constituen (s) of the material do not apply (see § 172.101(c)(iv)(B)).
171.8
040216
112.203 (к)

<<<PAGE 2>>>

You also ask if the wording "Suspected Category A Infectious Substance" and the
packaging and hazard communication prescribed in the 2005-2006 edition of the
International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) Technical Instructions for the
Transport of Dangerous Good by Air (Technical Instructions) may be used now to
transport the fungus you described or if you must wait until January 1, 2005, to use
these requirements. The ICAO does not authorize the use of these requirements until
January 1, 2005. (See the foreword of the ICAO Technical Instructions in the section
describing their operational use.) Under § 171.11, the HMR permit the use of the 2003-
2004 edition of the ICAO Technical Instructions, as incorporated by reference in § 171.7,
as an alternative to the requirements prescribed in the HMR for air shipments, with
certain exceptions. In a notice of proposed rulemaking we issued in the Federal Register
on June 22, 2004 (Docket No. RSPA-04-17036 (HM-215G), 69 FR 34724), we proposed
to revise this incorporation by reference to permit the use of the 2005-2006 edition of the
ICAO Technical Instructions. We expect to publish the rule in time to authorize use of
the 2005-2006 edition ICAO Technical Instructions under the HMR by January 1, 2005.
I hope this information is helpful.
Sincerely,
Director, Office of Hazardous
Edward T. Mazzullo
Materials Standards

<<<PAGE 3>>>

Infectious Substance Technical Names
Edmonson
Page 1 of 2
$ 171.8
4/14/04
Drakeford, Carolyn
§ 172.203 (к)
From:
Edmonson, Eileen
Technical Nanues
Sent:
Monday, September 13, 2004 1:16 PM
To:
Drakeford, Carolyn
04-0216
Subject: FW: Irfectious Substance Technical Names
letter writer. Thanks, Eileen
Carolyn - Please og this letter into the System. I've prepared a draft and am waiting for a call back from the
From: Mazzullo, Ed
----Original Message--.
To: Edmonson, Eileen
Sent: Tuesday, September 07, 2004 11:23 AM
Cc: Gorsky, Susan; Mitchell, Hattie; Mazzullo, Ed
Subject: FW: Infectious Substance Technical Names
Please handle.
Ed
-----Original Message-----
Sent: Friday, August 27, 2004 1:39 PM
From: Brinton, Paul [mailto:brintoph@aruplab.com]
To: Mazzullo, Ed <RSPA>
Subject: Infectious Substance Technical Names
Dear Mr. Mazzullo
of our clients in Cleveland that was sending specimen of fungus to our laboratory for identification. They used the
Recently, an FAA agent by the name of Jim Berk here in Salt Lake City called me regarding a shipment from one
technical name (Fungus). Mr. Berk felt that this designation was not sufficiently technical for use as the technical
issue on occasion. In the past, I have trained classes of clients and others that if they do not know what the
name. The client feels that they do not know any more about the specimen than that it is fungus. We have this
organism is, they should enter the Gram Stain results, such as (Gram negative bacillus) or (Gram positive rods). I
Sample). I discussed this with Mr. Berk. He then forwarded two pieces of information to me. One was a letter
called the Hazmat Hotline, and I was told by Kurt that the client in this case should use the term (Fungus
es of ratormation to me. One was letter
signed by you dated May 8'h
Virus Sample" is rot sufficient as a technical name. That leads me to wonder about the (Fungus Sample)
, 2002, to Beth E. Henricson, Ref. # 02-0127. In that letter, you mention that the term
designation. In addition, Mr. Berk told me that ICAO would not accept the (Fungus Sample) designation, anc
since airlines follov/ IATA rules, a well informed airline cargo agent may refuse that shiprent as well
I would like a clarif cation as to what an Infectious Substance Technical Name should be in the situations I have
when they are sending it for identification. Thank you for your response.
described, where the source hospital or clinic does not know to what Genus and species an organism belongs
Paul H. Brinton, MT (ASCP)
Vice President, Transportation & Logistics
ARUP Laboratories
9/13/2004

<<<PAGE 4>>>

Infectious Substance Technical Names
Page 2 of 2
500 Chipeta Way
Salt Lake City, UT 84108
(801)584-5136
brintoph@aruplab.com
attachments are from ARUP Laboratories and are intended only for the
The information transmitted by this e-mail and any included
and may constitute inside or non-public information under
recipient. The information contained in this message is confidential
international, federal, or state securities laws, or protected health
information and is intended only for the use of the recipient.
nauthorized forwarding, printing, copying, distributing, or use of
such information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you
are not the intended recipient, please promptly delete this e-mail
Laboratories Compliance Hot Line in Salt Lake City, Utah USA at (+1
and notify the sender of the delivery error or you may call ARUP
9/13/2004

<<<PAGE 5>>>

Zad Response
Edmonson, Eileen
Kel. No. 04-0216
Sent:
From:
To:
Thursday, November 04, 2004 9:12 AM
§§171-8,172.101(c)(11),
Subject:
Cc:
la susan form1102200 72016477172.2032
Gorsky, Susan; Mitchell, Hattie
Technical Names
PaulsLabels_Form.p
df (225 KB)
Eileen,
Please handle.
Thanks,
Ed
From: Brinton, Paul [mailto:brintoph@aruplab.com]
•----Original Message--
To: Ed Mazzullo
Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2004 6:14 PM
Subject: FW: Labels and
(E-mail)
Forms 11022004
mandated forms
Mr. Mazzullo, I wanted to send this file to you to make sure that, if we use the IATA
Law.
Much of the verbiage has changed for the coming year. This will also change the
and labels in the attached PDF file, we will not be in violation of Federal
name.
information we recently asked for regarding the use of the term "Fungus" as the technical
date
of March, 2005.
We are in the process of creating
ship specimens.
Ne must have all information ready by the end of November,
This User's Guide includes instructions for our clients on how to
our scientific User's Guide, with a publication
lot receive the "ATA regulations until late October, 2004.
We are also updating our on-
2004. We did
and a written response,
line Infectious Substance training course.
so that, if questioned, I might be able to send the your response
I would like to request an immediate response,
to satisfy the question. Thank you for your help.
Vice President,
Paul H. Brinton, MT (ASP)
ARUP Laboratories
Transportation & Logistics
500 Chipeta Way
Salt Lake City, UT 84108
(801) 584-5136
brintoph@aruplab.com
From:
-----Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2004 15:48
say november 03, 2000 35.10
Subject:
To:
Brinton, Paul
Labels and Forms 11022004
<<Paulslabels_Form.pdf>> Paul, here is the file you requested.
500 Chipeta Way
Timothy Scot Millar - Problem Resolution Specialist ARUP Laboratories,
Inc.
Salt Lake City, Utah 84123
1-800-242-2787 ext. 2336
<<Paulslabels_Form.pdf>>
The information transmitted by this e-mail
and any included attachments are from ARUP
1

<<<PAGE 6>>>

Laboratories anc. are intended only for the recipient. The information contained in this
international, federal, or state securities laws, or protected health information and is
message is confidential and may constitute inside or non-public information under
distributing, or use of such information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If
intended only fcr the use of the recipient. Unauthorized forwarding, printing, copying,
sender of the delivery error or you may call ARUP Laboratories Compliance Hot Line in Salt
you are not the intended recipient, please promptly delete this e-mail and notify the
Lake City, Utah USA at (+1
(800) 522-2787 ext. 2100

<<<PAGE 7>>>

UN3373
SPECIMENS
DIAGNOSTIC
Salt Lake Cly, Ull 84108
Responsible person

<<<PAGE 8>>>

Dry Ice
Note: 2 Ibs. = 1 kg.
кg.*
REFRIGERATION
800•242 • 2787
Salt Lake City, UT 84104
500 Chipeta Way
ARIP
SPECIMENS
OF MEDICAL
UN 1845
FOR THE

<<<PAGE 9>>>

SHIPPER'S DECLARATION FOR DANGEROUS GOODS
Stripper
Air Waybil No.
Page
1
1
Pages
Shipper's Reference Number: (optional)
Consignee:
600 Chipeta Way
Associated Regional and Univorsity Pathologists, Inc.
Salt Lake City, Utah 84108
ARIP
faul Brinton (801) 583-2787 ext. 5136
to the operator.
Two completed and signed copies of this Declaration must be handed
WARNING
TRANSPORT DETAILS
Failure to comply in all respects with the applicable
limitations prescribed for:
This shipinent is within the
Airport of Departure
applicable law, subject to legal penalties.
Dangerous Goods Regulations may be in breach of the
(delete run-applicable)
PASSENGER
AND CARGO
AIRCRAFT
Airport of Destinatin: Salt Lake City, Utah
NON-RADIOACTIVE XXXXXXXXX
Shipment type: (delete non-applicable)
NATURE AND QUANTITY OF DANGEROUS GOODS
(see sub-Section 8.1 of lATA Dangerous Goods Regulations)
Dangerous Goods Identification
UN
ID
or
No.
Proper Shipping Name
Division
Class or
Pack-
Group
ing
type of packing
Quantity and
Packing
Inst.
Authorization
WN 2814 Infectious substance,
6.2
(Suspected Category A
affecting humans
_mL
602
Infectious Substance)
Arklitional Handling Information
described above by the proper shipping name, and are ciassilied, packaged.
1 hereby desiare that the contents of this consignment are fully and accurately
Name/Title of Signatory
transport acéording lo ile applicable International and National Government
marked and labeled placarded, and are in all respects in proper condition for
ave been net.
Ragdations
¡ decture the ed of the applicable air transport requirements
Place and Date
(sce waning abo)
Signature
- **truncated:** false
- **body characters:** 12100
