# Department of the Army, Military Surface Deployment and Distribution Command, Operations Center — Hazardous Materials Safety Interpretation

- **operation:** document
- **citation:** 04-0247
- **title:** Department of the Army, Military Surface Deployment and Distribution Command, Operations Center — Hazardous Materials Safety Interpretation
- **source type:** guidance
- **agency:** Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
- **status:** guidance
- **official:** true
- **published on:** 2005-05-16
- **effective on:** Not available
- **summary:** 04-0247 response to Department of the Army, Military Surface Deployment and Distribution Command, Operations Center concerning 174.101, 174.104.
- **machine formats:** - **json:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-04-0247.json
- **markdown:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-04-0247.md
- **app url:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-04-0247
- **source url:** https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretation%20Files/2004/040247.pdf
**body:**

<<<PAGE 1>>>

of Transportation
U.S. Department
400 Seventh Street, S.W.
Washington, D.C. 20590
Pipeline and
Administration
Hazardous Materials Safety
MAY 16 2005
Major Mark P. Wyrosdick
Ref. No. 04-0247
Military Surface Deployment and Distribution Command
Department of the Army
Operations Center
661 Sheppard Place
Fort Eustis, VA 23604-1644
Dear Major Wyrosdick:
This responds to your October 15, 2004 letter requesting clarification of requirements in the
Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR; 49 CFR Parts 171-180) concerning the transportation
of explosives by rail. Specifically, you ask whether flat cars designated "F" and "FCA" in the
Official Railway Equipment Register (Register) may be used to transport Class 1 materials.
Please accept my apology for the delay in responding and any inconvenience this may have
caused.
Section 174.104 of the HMR generally requires Division 1.1 or 1.2 materials to be transported in
closed cars meeting specific regulatory requirernents. However, the HMR include exceptions
that allow for the transportation of Class 1 materials on flatcars, including those designated FC
and FCA in the Register. For example, § 174. 101(b) provides that "[bJoxed bombs, rocket
ammunition and rocket motors, Division 1.1, 1.2, or 1.3 (explosive) materials, which due to their
size cannot be loaded in closed cars, may be loaded in open-top cars or on flatcars, provided they
are protected from the weather and accidental ignition." Further, § 174.101(n) provides that
Division 1.1 or 1.2 explosive material (except black powder packed in metal containers) may be
transported in a freight container on a flatcar, provided certain conditions are met (e.g., the
freight container is "designed, constructed, and maintained so as to be weather tight and capable
of preventing the entrance of sparks," the freight container meets certain impact resistance tests,
is properly placarded and has a properly executed car certificate, and provided the freight
container and the lading inside the container is properly blocked and braced). Finally,
§ 174.101(o) provides that Division 1.1, 1.2, or 1.3 explosive material may be transported in a
"tight closed" trailer on a flatcar, provided certain conditions are met. Section 174.101(o) also
provides that, in certain instances, when Division 1.1, 1.2, or 1.3 materials cannot be loaded into
closed trailers because of their size, the materials may be transported on open-top trailers, so long
as the materials are protected against accidental ignition and certain other conditions are met.
You also ask whether the Federal Railroad Administration (FR4.) has delegated authority to
represent the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA; formerly the
Research and Special Programs Administration) for interpretations of the HMR. As the agency
174.101
174.104
040247

<<<PAGE 2>>>

delegated authority to issue hazardous materials safety and security regulations, PHMSA is
responsible for issuing formal legal interpretations of the HMR and the Federal hazardous
materials transportation law (Federal hazmat law; 49 U.S.C. 5101 et seq.), which are published in
the Federal Register, ard for providing informal interpretations (advice, guidance, and
clarification) concerning the requirements of Federal hazmat law and the HMR. FRA has
delegated authority over "all areas of railroad safety," including the enforcement of the hazardous
materials regulations issued by PHMSA. FRA and the other DOT operating administrations are
authorized to issue informal interpretations that apply to a single mode of transportation or that
raise issues that have been previously addressed in letters of interpretation. In consultation with
PHMSA, FRA issues such informal interpretations with respect to rail transportation of
hazardous materials or well-settled interpretations, such as the two informal interpretations
enclosed with your letter.
contact this office or FRA's Hazardous Materials Staff Director, Mr. William Schoonover, at
If you have any further questions regarding the above interpretation, please do not hesitate to
(202) 493-6229.
Sincerely,
Susan Gorsky
Acting Director
Office of Hazardous Materials Standards

<<<PAGE 3>>>

10/15/04
15:34 FAX 7578788887
MTMC- DC.--FN
@002
NILITARY SURFACE DEPLOYMENT AND DISTRIBUTION COMMAND
DEPARTMET OF THE ARMY
webb
661 SHEPPARD PLACE
OPERA TONS CENTER
REPLY TO
FORT EUST S, VA 23604-1644
$174.101
ATTENTION OF
Safety Division
October 15, 2004
§ 174.104
Mr. Edward T. Mazzullo
Explosive
Office of Hazardous Materials Standards
Director, DHM-10
Research and Special Programs Administration
04-0247
U.S. Department of Transportation
400 Seventh Street, SW
Washington, DC 20590
Dear Sir:
Department of Defense hereby requests interpretation of hazardous materials regulations as outlined below. The
In accordance with the provisions of Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Section 105.20, the
following file number has been assigned:
File Number: 201-04 (1015)
Proponent: Department of Defense
Request Official Interpretation of standards 49 CFR 174.104 and 174.101
operations affecting the transportations of Class 1 explosive materials.
We are requesting an official interpretation of the following citations and their impact upon DOD
certification." Specifically, 174.104(a) Except as provider in 174.101....(n).... Division 1.1 or 1.2 (explosive
1. 49 CFR 174.104 "Division 1.1 or 1.2 (explosive) materials; car selection, preparation, inspection, and
materials boing transported by rail may be transported only in a certified and properly placarded closed car...."
freight container on a flatcar...".
2. 49 CFR 174.101 "Loading Class 1 (explosive) materials." Specifically, 174.104(n) a container car or
....(2) A container car of car which is loaded with freight containers....."
Our question is what is the official position of the Department of Transportation (DOT) with respect to the
following designations:
MDC Modern Flat Car Equipment
1. FC
Flat car well type.
2. FCA
Flat car articulated well type.
3. FCA
Flat car articulated skeltonized/spine type.
is not a clearly defined connection relating to the question: we pose regarding the more moder flat car equipment
Our understanding of the above standards indicates they are intended for boxcars and container cars. There
above. Further, we are in possession of interpretations (attachments 1 & 2) issued previously by the Federal

<<<PAGE 4>>>

10/15/04
15:34 FAX 7578788887
MTMC-DC-FN
0003
available through 49 CFR Part 106 "Rulemaking Procedures" we would be available for consultation and
If our issues are a matter for change to those regulatory standards above employing the mechanisms
participation. This request is submitted by Mr. Joseph P. Dugan, phone (757) 878-8294, e/mail
dugani@sddc.army.mil, Safety Staff:, Military Surface Deployment and Distribution Command, 661 Sheppard Place,
Fort Eustis, VA 23604-1644.
Sincerely,
Mach Po Wyrolick
Mark P. Wyrosdick
Major, US Air Force
Enci
Chief of Safety
- **truncated:** false
- **body characters:** 7014
