# State of Utah, DEQ — Hazardous Materials Safety Interpretation

- **operation:** document
- **citation:** 05-0099
- **title:** State of Utah, DEQ — Hazardous Materials Safety Interpretation
- **source type:** guidance
- **agency:** Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
- **status:** guidance
- **official:** true
- **published on:** 2005-12-01
- **effective on:** Not available
- **summary:** 05-0099 response to State of Utah, DEQ concerning 173.24.
- **machine formats:** - **json:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-05-0099.json
- **markdown:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-05-0099.md
- **app url:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-05-0099
- **source url:** https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretation%20Files/2005/050099.pdf
**body:**

<<<PAGE 1>>>

U.S. Department
JUN 13 2005
of Transportation
400 Seventh Street, S.W.
Washington, D.C. 20590
Pipeline and
Hazardous Materials Safety
Administration
Mr. Jule Fausto
Ref. No. 05-0099
Transportation Specialist
State of Utah, DEQ
Division of Radiation Control
168 North 1950 West
Salt Lake City, UT 84114-4850
Dear Mr. Fausto:
This is in response to your April 19, 2005, letter requesting clarification of the Hazardous
Materials Regulations (HMR; 49 CFR Parts 171-180). Specifically, you ask if
radioactive materials are excluded from the general requirements for packagings and
packages in § 173.24(b)(1).
The answer is no. Each package used for the shipment of hazardous materials shall be
designed, constructed, maintained, filled, its contents so limited, and closed, so that under
conditions normally incident to transportation, there will be no identifiable (without the
use of instruments) release of hazardous materials to the environment (§ 173.24(b)(1)).
These general requirements for packagings and packages apply to all hazard classes,
unless otherwise excepted.
I hope this satisfies your request.
Sincerely,
Chief, Standards Developmen
Office of Hazardous Materials Standards
173.24 650)
050099

<<<PAGE 2>>>

Page 1 of 1
Williams, James <PHMSA›
From: Jule Fausto jjfausto@utah.gov]
BAH
Sent:
Tuesday, April 19, 2005 4:22 PM
5173-24 b)(1)
To:
Williams, James <PHMSA>
Cc:
Boyd Imai; John Hultquist
Packagings +
Subject: Regarding 173.24(b)(1)
Packages
Hello James:
05-0099
I have a question regarding 173.24(b)(1) which states,
"there can be no identifiable release (without the use of
instruments) of hazmat to the environment". Does this exclude radioactive materials since in many cases the
only way to identify if RAM material has escaped to the environment is with the use of instruments. For
instance, an incident involving I.SA wher liquid material leaked fro a rail car of solid material was determined to
be radioactive but this was determined only after taking measurements of what had leaked out of the rail car.
This was shipped as a lined gondola.
I looked through the "opinion" letters on the PHMSA website but could not find any letters applicable. I would
greatly appreciate an intrepretation or any insight
that you could provide.
Thank you,
Jule Fausto
Transportation Specialist
State of Utah, DEQ, DRC
4/21/2005
- **truncated:** false
- **body characters:** 2356
