# Mr. Ed Mansell — Hazardous Materials Safety Interpretation

- **operation:** document
- **citation:** 05-0200
- **title:** Mr. Ed Mansell — Hazardous Materials Safety Interpretation
- **source type:** guidance
- **agency:** Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
- **status:** guidance
- **official:** true
- **published on:** 2006-04-11
- **effective on:** Not available
- **summary:** 05-0200 concerning 178.337.
- **machine formats:** - **json:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-05-0200.json
- **markdown:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-05-0200.md
- **app url:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-05-0200
- **source url:** https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretation%20Files/2005/050200.pdf
**body:**

<<<PAGE 1>>>

Or asporation
400 Seventh Street, S.W.
Washington, D.C. 20590
Hazardous Materials Safety
Pipeline and
Administration
APR 11 2006
Mr. Ed Mansell
P.O. Box 310
Ref. No. 05-0200
4825 E. Kearney
Springfield, MO 65801
Dear Mr. Mansell:
This responds to your August 18, 2005 letter requesting clarification on accident damage
protection requirements for MC 331 cargo tanks under the Hazardous Materials
Regulations (HMR; 49 CPR Parts 171-180).
Section 178.337-10(a) requires all valves, fittings, pressure relief devices, and other
accessories to the tank proper to be protected against such damage as could be caused by
collision with other vehicles or objects, jack-knifing and overturning. In addition,
pressure relief vales must be protected so that in the event of overturn of the vehicle onto
a hard surface, the valve will continue to function.
Section 178.337-10(b) requires protective devices or housing to be designed to withstand
siled vating lading dising a say to tore the weigh a terabase on taints when.
strength of the material to be used, without damage to the fittings protected, and must be
made of metal at least 3/16-inch thick.
Your questions are paraphrased and answered as follows:
Q1. If there is a shear section in the valves on an MC-331 tank, is accident damage
protection required per §178.337-10(b)?
Al. Yes.
Q2. If shear sections are provided for the valving and piping, must the accident damage
protection conform to $178.337-10(b)?
A2. Yes.
178.337-10
050200

<<<PAGE 2>>>

Q3. If shear sections are not provided for the valving and piping, is accident damage
protection required per §178.337-10(b)?
A3. Yes.
Q4. Are the accident damage protection requirements for MC 331 cargo tanks being
evaluated for consistency with the requirements for DOT-406, DOT-407, and DOT-412
cargo tanks?
A4. At this time, we are not considering modification to the accident damage protection
requirements for MC 331 cargo tanks. You may petition for a rule change if you believe
that modification should be considered. Procedures for submitting a petition for
rulemaking are in 49 CFR 106.95.
I hope this answers your inquiry.
Chief, Standards Developmen
Office of Hazardous Materials Standards

<<<PAGE 3>>>

Boathe
From: Ed Mansell
$178.331-10
4825 E. Kearney
P.O. Box 310
Thursday, August 18, 2005
Accident Damage Protechn er:
178337-10ADP
Springfield, MO 65801
To:
Office of Hazardous Materials
Cargo Tocks
Research and Special Programs Administration
U.S. Department of Transportation
05-0200
4007" Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20590-001
Attn:
DHM-10
Sec. 178.337-10 Accident damage protection.
(a) All valves, fittings, pressure relief devices, amd other accessories to the tank proper shall be protected in
accordance with paragraph (b) of this section against such damage as could be caused by collision with other
the event of overturn of the vehicle onto a hard surface, their opening will not be prevented and their discharge
vehicles or objects, jack-knifing and overturming. In addition, pressure relief valves shall be so protected that ir
will not be restricted.
(b)
The protective devices or housing must be designed to withstand static loading in any direction equal to twice the
on the ultimate strength of the material to be used, without damage to the fittings protected, and must be made of
weight of the tank and attachments when filled with the lading, using a safety factor of not less than four, based
metal at least \3/16\-inch thick.
regulations that exempt the "damage protection" device if shear sections are provided.
Paragraph. (a) requires accident damage protection whether a shear section is installed or not since there is nothing in the
Question 1:
If there is a shear section in the valves on MC-331 tank, is accident damage protection required per
178.337-10(b)? (Yes or No)
Question 2:
not have to comply with 178.337-10(ib)? (Yes or No)
If shear sections are provided for the valving and piping then accident damage can be installed, but does
Question 3:
If shear sections are not provided for the valving and piping then accident damage protection must be
provided per 178.337-10(b)? (Yes or No)
Question 4:
178.337-10(b) is most likely not feasible and most likely resuits in a very stiff structure that just transfers
make it similar to the requirements of DOT-406, DOT-407, and DOT-412 Cargo Tanks?
the peak stresses into the vessel wall cor vessel pads. Is this section of the regulation being evaluated to
Sincerely,
Ed MansellI
- **truncated:** false
- **body characters:** 4493
