# Horizon Lines — Hazardous Materials Safety Interpretation - **operation:** document - **citation:** 05-0275 - **title:** Horizon Lines — Hazardous Materials Safety Interpretation - **source type:** guidance - **agency:** Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration - **status:** guidance - **official:** true - **published on:** 2005-11-21 - **effective on:** Not available - **summary:** 05-0275 response to Horizon Lines concerning 176.400, 176.83. - **machine formats:** - **json:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-05-0275.json - **markdown:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-05-0275.md - **app url:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-05-0275 - **source url:** https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretation%20Files/2005/050275.pdf **body:** <<>> J.S. Department f Transportatior Washington, D.C. 20590 400 Seventh Street, S.W. Pipeline and Administration Hazardous Materials Safety NOV 21 2005 Mr. Cliff Bartley Ref. No. 05-0275 Horizon Lines Blount Island 5800-1 William Mills Street Jacksonville, Florida 32226 Dear Mr. Bartley: This is in response to your October 24, 2005 letter requesting clarification of the Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR; 49 CFR Parts 171-180). Specifically, you ask for clarification of § 176.400(c), which requires Division 1.5 and Class 5 (oxidizers and organic peroxides) materials to be stowed in a separate compartment or hold from any readily combustible material during transportation by vessel. You ask if that section applies to materials transported in a closed transport unit (CTU), as break-bulk cargo, or The stowage restriction in § 176.400(c) applies to any Division 1.5 or Class 5 material, regardless of whether it is transported inside a CTU or as break-bulk cargo. Thus, under the HMR, any Division 1.5 or Class 5 material transported by vessel must be stowed in a separate compartment or cargo hold from any readily combustible material. You are correct that paragraph 7.1.11.1 of the International Maritime Dangerous Goods Code (IMDG Code) includes an exception from this stowage restriction for Division 5.1 materials in CTUs. Note, however, that in accordance with paragraph 7.1.11.4, precautions must be taken to avoid the penetration of oxidizing substances into other cargo spaces, bilges, or other areas that may contain combustible material. It is the opinion of this Office and the United States Coast Guard that the exception in paragraph 7.1.11.1 of the IMDG Code would apply to Division 5.1 materials in a CTU stowed in the same compartment or cargo hold as combustible materials in a CTU; however, under the IMDG Code Division 5.1 materials, whether in a CTU or transported as break-bulk cargo, may not be stowed in the same compartment or cargo hold with break-bulk 176.83 (f) 176:400 050275 <<>> combustible material. Further, Division 1.5 materials are generally required to be stowed in a separate compartment or hold from other cargo that is readily combustible in accordance with paragraph 7.1.7.4.1.1. I hope this information is helpful. Please contact us if you require additional assistance. Sincerely <<>> ZHONZON Fichenlaub October 24, 2005 $176.83(f) §116.400 Mr. Ed Mazzullo Director Office of Hazardous Materials Vessel Hazardous Materials Standards USDOT / PRMSA / DHM10 05-0275 400 7 Street S.W. Washington, DC 20590 Re: 49CFR176.400( c) Detailed Requirements for class 4, Class 5 and division 1.5 materials Dear Mr. Mazzullo, We, Horizon Lines, LLC, are a domestic containerized ocean transportation company. I am 49CFR176.400(c)" which states: seeking understanding on the applicability to container shipments of the statement in "No division 1.5 or class 5 )oxidizers and organic peroxides) material being transported by vessel may be stowed in the same hold or compartment with any readily combustible material such as a combustible, a textile product, or with a finely divided substance, such as a organic powder." My question is does this statement apply to containerized shipments? Container stowage and segregation is generally done in conjunction with the tables of 175.83(b) and 176.83(f) combined with the considerations of the detailed stowage requirements. In the case of a class 5 and a class 8, the segregation is listed as "Separated from" which allows for a minimum of 20 feet distance between the two incompatible classes but there is no indication that the cargo must be stowed in separate hatches. It seems that the statement in 49CFR176.400(c) was targeted towards break bulk cargo rather than containerized cargo. The parallel detailed stowage reference in the International Maritime Dangerous Goods Code in section 7.1.11.1 - 4 specifically excludes container shipment from the restriction. Section 7.1.11.1 of the IMDG code states: "Except for cargo spaces for the stowage of cargo transport units, cargo spaces shall be cleaned before oxidizing substances are loaded into them. Attention shall be paid to the removal of all combustible materials which are not necessary for the stowage of such cargoes." In discussing this matter with the U.S. Coast Guard, they seem to agree that this section does not apply to containers. 1 Horizon Lines • Blount Island • 5800-1 William Mills Street • Jacksonville. FL 32226 • 904.757.8266 • www.horizon-lines.com <<>> CLINES" • HORIZON Please provide guidance on the interpretation of 49CFR176.400(c). Thank you for your consideration of my question. Sincerely, Cliff Badly Cliff Bartley, Manager Hazardous Materials 2 Horizon Lines • Blount Island • 5800-1 William Mills Street • Jacksonville, FL 32226 • 904.757.8266 • www.horizon-lines.com - **truncated:** false - **body characters:** 4883