# Inmark, Inc. — Hazardous Materials Safety Interpretation

- **operation:** document
- **citation:** 06-0269
- **title:** Inmark, Inc. — Hazardous Materials Safety Interpretation
- **source type:** guidance
- **agency:** Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
- **status:** guidance
- **official:** true
- **published on:** 2007-02-23
- **effective on:** Not available
- **summary:** 06-0269 response to Inmark, Inc. concerning 173.199, 173.4, 178.601.
- **machine formats:** - **json:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-06-0269.json
- **markdown:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-06-0269.md
- **app url:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-06-0269
- **source url:** https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretation%20Files/2006/060269.pdf
**body:**

<<<PAGE 1>>>

or resortion
Washington, D.C. 20590
400 Seventh Street, S.W.
Hazardous Materials Safety
Pipeline and
FEB 23 2007
Administration
Mr. Junius "Jay" Johnson
Ref. No. 06-0269
Inmark, Inc.
Regulatory Compliance Manager
675 Hartman Rd.
Austell, GA 30168
Dear Mr. Johnson:
This is in response to your electronic transmission requesting clarification of the
exceptions under the Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR; 49 CFR Parts 171-180)
applicable to the transportation of small quantities (§ 173.4) and biological substances,
Category B (§ 173.199). Specifically, you ask whether the HMR provide exceptions,
similar to the variations in § 178.601(g), from testing every package configuration when
in accordance with § 173.4 or § 173.199.
performing drop tests involving glass inner packages containing materials to be packaged
The answer is yes. The exception in § 173.4 for small quantities requires the completed
package, as demonstrated by prototype testing, to be capable of sustaining the drop test
and compressive load test in § 173.4(a)(6). A non-bulk packaging that differs in only
minor respects from a successfully tested prototype may be used without further testing
provided the differences would not affect the capability of the package to sustain the drop
and compressive load tests specified for small quantity packagings. The selective testing
used as examples of the types of packaging variations that would not require additional
variations in § 178.601(g), although not applicable to non-specification packages, may be
prototype testing under § 173.4.
Packagings intended for the transportation of Category B infectious substances must be
Capable of suce be demonsane he drop nests in paragrapod, inciding an a 23500,
previous handling and transportation experience, or design specification. Thus, you need
not test packagings that differ in only minor respects from a tested packaging if you can
173.4
173.199
060269
178.601

<<<PAGE 2>>>

required drop tests.
demonstrate that the new packaging configuration is capable of successfully passing the
contact this office.
I hope this information is helpful. If you have further questions, please do not hesitate to
Sincerely,
Hattie L. Mitchell
Chief, Regulatory Review and Reinvention
Office of Hazardous Materials Standards

<<<PAGE 3>>>

Page 1 of 1
M03 tyre
§173.199
Drakeford, Carolyn <PHMSA>
§178.601
From: Gorsky, Susan <PHMSA>
Sent: Monday, November 27, 2006 12:08 PM
Testing
To:
Drakeford, Carolyn <PHMSA>
06-0269
Subject: FW: Packaging question
Could you make this an interpretation please? Thanks.
Sent: Monday, November 27, 2006 11:42 AM
From: Jay Johnson [mailto:jayj@inmarkinc.com]
Subject: RE: Packaging question
To: Gorsky, Susan <PHMSA>
I have question that I hope you will be able to shed some light on.
Dear Susan Gorsky,
We have a customer that has asked us to design and test a packaging system to be used in
the laboratory for shipping small volumes of hazardous chemical samples under 173.4 and
biological substances, category B under 173.199.
Is there a link similar to Variation Testing that allows me to do drop tests using fragile glass
that would then give me flexibility in the primaries without having to test every configuration?
Best regards,
Thanks for all your help.
Jay
Junius "Jay" Johnson
Regulatory Compliance Manager
Inmark Inc.
675 Hartman Rd • Austell, GA 30168
main: 770.373.3300 ext.113 /fax: 770.373.3301
jayj@inmarkinc.com www.inmarkinc.com
11/27/2006
- **truncated:** false
- **body characters:** 3472
