# HMT Associates L.L.C. — Hazardous Materials Safety Interpretation - **operation:** document - **citation:** 07-0132 - **title:** HMT Associates L.L.C. — Hazardous Materials Safety Interpretation - **source type:** guidance - **agency:** Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration - **status:** guidance - **official:** true - **published on:** 2008-04-30 - **effective on:** Not available - **summary:** 07-0132 response to HMT Associates L.L.C. concerning 178.700, 178.707. - **machine formats:** - **json:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-07-0132.json - **markdown:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-07-0132.md - **app url:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-07-0132 - **source url:** https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretation%20Files/2007/070132.pdf **body:** <<>> U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration APR 3 0 2008 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, D.C. 20590 Mr. E. A. Altemos HMT Associates, L.L.C. Suite 300 603 King Street Alexandria, Virginia 223 14-3 105 Ref. No.: 07-0132 Dear Mr. Altemos: This responds to your June 15,2007 letter, requesting clarification of requirements applicable to intermediate bulk containers (IBCs) under the Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR; 49 CFR Parts 171 -1 80). Specifically, you ask if a composite IBC may be fitted with more than one inner receptacle. A composite packaging, including a composite IBC, is a packaging that consists of an outer packaging and an inner receptacle constructed so that they form an integral packaging that is filled, stored, shipped, and emptied as an integrated single unit. Standards for composite IBCs are set forth in 5 178.707 of the HMR. In accordance with 5 178.707(b)(l), a composite IBC consists of a rigid outer packaging enclosing a plastic inner receptacle, together with any service or structural equipment. An IBC must have a volumetric capacity between 0.45 cubic meters (450 L, 11 9 gallons, or 15.9 cubic feet) and not more than three cubic meters (3,000 L, 793 gallons, or 106 cubic feet) or a maximum net mass of not less than 400 kg (882 pounds) (see, 6 178.700(~)(1)). Although not specifically prohibited under the HMR, the plain language of the regulatory text applicable to composite IBCs suggests that we did not intend to permit an IBC to be fitted with two or more inner receptacles. In addition to the definition in 5 178.707(b)(l), the specification references "the inner receptacle" in a number of places (see, for example, 5 178.707(~)(1), (c)(2), (c)(3), (c)(3)(ii) and (c)(3)(iii)). Taken together, these references indicate that a composite IBC may contain only a single inner receptacle. Similarly, the capacity requirements specified in 9 178.700(~)(1), which define the "body" of an IBC in terms of the "receptacle proper," indicate that IBCs of all types including composite IBCs, consist of a single receptacle, including openings and closures. Moreover, the capacity limitations specified in 5 178.700(~)(1) are specified in terms of a composite IBC with a single inner receptacle and can not be applied directly to a packaging with multiple inner receptacles. For the reasons outlined above, it is the opinion of this office that a composite IBC may not be fitted with more than one inner receptacle. A composite IBC fitted with two or more inner <<>> receptacles may be authorized for the transportation of hazardous materials only under the terms of an approval or a special permit. I hope this information is helpful. If you have further questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Sincerely, tur- dward T. Mazzullo Director, Office of Hazardous Materials Standards <<>> S c t h c ~ ? daite 3176.707 TbCs HMT ASSOCIATES, L-L-C. 07- 0 132 803 KING ST. SUITE 300 ALEXANDRIA, VA 2231 4-31 05 €.A. ALTEMOS PATRICIA A. QUlNN - FACSIMILE: 703-549-0728 WRITER'S DIRECT DIAL NUMBER (703) 549-0727, Ext. 11 June 1 5,2007 Mr. Edward T. Mazzullo Director, Office of IIazardous Materials Standards (PI-111-1 0) Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE East Building, 2nd Floor Washington, D.C. 20590-0001 Dear Mr. Mazzullo: This is to request your confinnation of my understanding of the provisions ofthe Department of Transportation's Hazardous Materials Regulations ("the H M R ; 49 CFR Parts 17 1 - 1 80) as they relate to composite intermediate bulk containers (IBCs). Specifically, it is my understanding from reviewing thc applicable regulations that a composite IBC, for example, a type 3 1HA1 IBC (a composite IBC consisting of a plastic inner receptacle within a metal outer packaging), may be constructed with more than one inner receptacle. 'I'hat is, a composite IBC may be fitted with o& one inner receptacle. While this issue is not explicitly addressed in thc l-IMR, 1 believe it is implicit from a number of provisions that a composite IBC may be fitted with on& one inner receptacle. For example, the definition for "composite IBC" in 5 178.707(b)(l) of the HMR states in pertinent part that a composite IBC "is an IBC which consists of a rigid outer packaging enclosing 3 plastic inner receptacle ..." (emphasis added). In addition, in the description provided in fj 178.707(a) of the various IBC type designations, each IBC type designation is described as a type of IBC with either "a - rigid plastic inner receptacle" or "_a flexible plastic inner receptacle" (emphasis added). Moreover, in the construction requirements for composite IBCs, in 5 178.707(~)(3) the inner receptacle is referred to in the singular, for example ''W inner receptacle must be manufactured from plastic material of known specifications ..." and ''U inner receptacle of 3 1HZ2 composite 1BCs must consist of at least three plies of film" (emphasis added). Finally, in describing the required periodic inspection of composite IRCs, it states in 5 180.352(b)(2)(iii) that ''U inncr receptacle of a <<>> HMT ASSO(.?IATEG, T~.L.C:. Mr. Edward T. Mazzullo June 15,2007 Page 2 composite IBC must be removed from the outer IBC body for inspection unless the inner receptacle is bonded to the outer body or unless the outer body is constructed in such a way (e.g., a welded or riveted cage) that removal of & inner receptacle is not possible without impairing the integrity of the outer body" (emphasis added). Thus, in each of the above provisions reference to the inner receptacle is in the singular. On the other hand, if it were intended that more than one inner receptacle may be placed in thc rigid outer packaging of a composite IBC, in each of the provisions cited above references to the inner receptacle presumably would have been in the plural (i.e., "inner receptacles" or "inner receptacle(s)"). This would be consistent with terminology used throughout the HMR, for example, the references to inner packagings in the definitions for "combination packaging" and "large packaging" in 4 17 1.8, where it is intended that an outer packaging may contain more than one inncr packaging or inner receptacle. In summary, for the reasons outlined above, it is my understanding that implicit in the HMR provisions prescribing the definition, and construction and inspection requirements, for composite IBCs, is that a composite IBC may be fitted with o& one inner receptacle. Your confirmation that my understanding in this regard is correct will be most appreciated. Thank you for your consideration of this matter, and please do not hesitate to contact me if you have questions concerning this request, or if you require additional information. Sincerely, E. A. Altemos cc: Mr. Charlcs Hochrnan (PHH-20) Mr. Don Burger (PHH-22) <<>> T KEEP THIS END UP 1 <<>> PRODUCE ICALADAINC BEFORE VENT TANK ACAUTION CLOSED AS A STANDARD STEM VALVE THIS VALVE OPERATES OPEN - **truncated:** false - **body characters:** 7098