# Energy Solutions — Hazardous Materials Safety Interpretation

- **operation:** document
- **citation:** 08-0021
- **title:** Energy Solutions — Hazardous Materials Safety Interpretation
- **source type:** guidance
- **agency:** Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
- **status:** guidance
- **official:** true
- **published on:** 2009-01-14
- **effective on:** Not available
- **summary:** 08-0021 response to Energy Solutions concerning 172.704, 177.816.
- **machine formats:** - **json:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-08-0021.json
- **markdown:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-08-0021.md
- **app url:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-08-0021
- **source url:** https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretation%20Files/2008/080021.pdf
**body:**

<<<PAGE 1>>>

U.S. Department
of Transportation
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
JAN 1 4 2@9
1200 New Jersey Ave., SE
Washington, DC 20590
Mr. James H. Portsmouth
Manager
TrafficIRegulatory Compliance
Energy Solutions
2345 Stevens Drive Suite 240
Richland, WA 99354
Ref. No.: 08-0021
Dear Mr. Portsmouth:
This responds to your letter regarding clarification of the driver training requirements in
8 177.8 16 of the Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR; 49 CFR Parts 17 1 - 180), as they
apply to the frequency and recordkeeping of drivers transporting hazardous materials. We
apologize for the delay in responding and hope that it has not caused any inconvenience.
You cite two previously written interpretations (611 8/99 and 10/11/02) which you assert
conflict with a preamble discussion of the driver training requirements with respect to
frequency and recordkeeping provisions contained in the final rule, titled "Training for Safe
Transportation of Hazardous Materials; Revisions and Response to Petitions for
Reconsideration," published in the Federal Register January 22, 1993 [58 FR 58501.
Specifically, you ask if the training frequency and recordkeeping requirements in 4 172.704
apply to drivers trained in accordance with 49 CFR Parts 390 through 397.
The answer is yes. A carrier may not transport a hazardous material by motor vehicle unless
each hazmat employee, including a driver, is trained as prescribed by Subpart H of Part 172
of the HMR. A carrier may not transport a hazardous material unless each hazmat driver
trained as required by Subpart H of Part 172 is also trained in the applicable requirements of
the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations (FMCSR; 49 CFR Parts 390 through 397). The
training prescribed in Subpart H of Part 172 must initially be completed within 90 days after
employment or a change in job function and recurrent training at least once every three years.
Both written interpretations are correct. The preamble discussion in the final rule in Docket
HM-126F (58 FR 5851) was intended to clarify that compliance with current requirements
for a Commercial Driver's License (CDL) with a tank vehicle or hazmat endorsement mav
satisfv the training provisions of paragraphs (a) and (b) of 8 177.8 16. Additional training,
such as operation of emergency control features of cargo tanks and portable tanks, as
prescribed in paragraph (b), with respect to frequency and recordkeeping must be conducted

<<<PAGE 2>>>

in accordance with the requirements of $172.704, for both initial and recurrent training.
Preamble discussion, although intended to be informative and helpful, is not used to
determine compliance with the regulations.
I hope this information is helpful. If we can be of M h e r assistance, please contact us.
Sincerely, fhd
Charles. E. Betts
Chief, Standards Development
of Hazardous Materials Standards

<<<PAGE 3>>>

January 4,2008
Ms. Hattie L. itch ell
U.S. Department of Transportation
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
Office of Hazardous Materials, Standards
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE East Building, 2"d Floor
Washington, DC 20590
Subject: Drivers' Training Clarification
Dear Ms. Mitchell,
I am requesting clarification on an issue that U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) has
presented conflicting positions concerning frequency and recordkeeping of drivers' training that
transport hazardous material. 49 CFR 177.8 16(a) requires drivers that transport hazardous
material to be trained to 49 CFRParts 390 through 397. The Federal RegisterIVol. 58,
No. 13/Friday, January 22, 1993Rules and RegulationsIPage 5851 (see Attachment 1) declares
that frequency and recordkeeping requirements for this does not have to meet frequency and
recordkeeping requirements of 49 CFR 172.704. However, in two letters of interpretations (see
Attachments 2 and 3) dated June 18, 1999 and October 11, 2002, respectively, asserts that the
frequency and recordkeeping must follow 49 CFR 172.704.
Question: Does 49 CFR 172.704 apply to drivers' training to 49 CFR Parts 390 through 397
concerning frequency and recordkeeping?
If you have any questions regarding this request, you can contact me at (509) 376-7164 or
(509) 591-2932. Your clarification in this matter is appreciated.
Sincerely,
James H. Portsmouth, Manager
Trafficrnegulatory Compliance
jmt
Attachments
EnergySolutions - JHP File/LB
2345 Stevens Drive, Suite 240 Richland, WA 99354
509.371.8006 Fax: 509.371.1906 1.888.532.1330 www.cnergysolulions.com
- **truncated:** false
- **body characters:** 4511
