# Altair Nanotechnologies, Inc. — Hazardous Materials Safety Interpretation

- **operation:** document
- **citation:** 08-0186
- **title:** Altair Nanotechnologies, Inc. — Hazardous Materials Safety Interpretation
- **source type:** guidance
- **agency:** Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
- **status:** guidance
- **official:** true
- **published on:** 2008-07-31
- **effective on:** Not available
- **summary:** 08-0186 response to Altair Nanotechnologies, Inc. concerning 173.185.
- **machine formats:** - **json:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-08-0186.json
- **markdown:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-08-0186.md
- **app url:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-08-0186
- **source url:** https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretation%20Files/2008/080186.pdf
**body:**

<<<PAGE 1>>>

U.S. Department
of Transportation
Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety
Administration
1200 New Jersey Ave., S.E.
Washington. DC 20590
Mr. Jeffiey A. McKinney
Vice President and Chief Patent Counsel
Altair Nanotechnologies, Inc.
204 Edison Way
Reno, NV 89502
Ref. No. 08-01 86
Dear Mr. McKinney:
This responds to your July 1 1,2008 letter requesting clarification of the requirements for
shipment of lithium batteries under the Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR; 49 CFR Parts
171 - 180). Specifically, you ask whether § 173.1 85(e), Shipments for testing (prototypes),
applies to shipments of prototype lithium cells or batteries transported for purposes of product
performance and field demonstration testing.
The answer is yes. Section 173.185(e) is not limited to transportation of prototype lithium
cells or batteries for the purpose of UN testing in accordance with § 173.185(a). Prototype
lithium cells or batteries may also be transported under the provisions of 173.185(e) for
product performance testing or field demonstration testing in connection with product
development programs.
I hope this information is helpful. Please contact us if you require additional assistance.
Sincerely,
Regulations 0ff;cer
Office of Hazardous Materials Standards

<<<PAGE 2>>>

Altairnanb
i n n o v a t i o n a t w o r k
July 1 1,2008
Edward Mazzullo
Director
Office of Hazardous Materials Standards
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA)
PHH- 1 0
U.S. Department of Transportation, East Building
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
Washington, DC 20590400 1
Dear Mr. Mazzullo:
Altair Nanotechnologies, Inc. ("Altaimano") is a nanotechnology company based
in Reno, Nevada, that specializes in the production of lithium ion cells and batteries. As such,
Altairnano is subject to the federal laws regulating the shipment of hazardous materials,
specifically 49 C.F.R. 8 173.185, Lithium cells and batteries. We have received what appear to
be different explanations from PHMSA officials as to the circumstances under which a
manufacturer can ship prototype cells or batteries via motor vehicle without prior PHMSA
approval.
Accordingly, we are requesting PHMSA's views on the proper interpretation of
the term "testing", as that term is used in 49 C.F.R. 5 173.185(e). Section 173.185(e) states in
relevant part: "Shipments for Testing @rototypes). A lithium cell or battery is excepted from the
requirements of [§ 173.1851 (a)(l) of this section when transported by motor vehicle for purposes
of testingm(Emphasis added) This section is important because it governs the circumstances in
which prototype cells or batteries can be shipped via motor vehicle without prior approval from
PHMSA.
One possible interpretation of this section is that the only circumstances in which
the cell or battery can be shipped by motor vehicle without prior approval from PHMSA is if the
shipment is to a location where some or all of the UN tests referenced in section (a)(l) will be
performed. Under this construction, the purpose of section (e) would be to permit a
manufacturer to ship its product by motor vehicle to a testing facility for the purpose of
performing UN testing and, in this circumstance, the manufacturer would not be required to
apply for a Competent Authority Approval ("CAW) under 49 C.F.R. 5173.185 (f). The
Competent Authority in this instance would be PHMSA.
Altairnano, Inc.
2 0 4 Edison Way. Reno, NV 8 9 5 0 2 - 2 3 0 6
altairnano.com
phone 775.856.2500 1 fax 775.856.161 9

<<<PAGE 3>>>

An equally plausible interpretation of section (e) is that it covers not only
shipments made for the purpose of LTN testing, but also prototype shipments made by motor
vehicle exclusivelv for the purpose of conducting non-UN performance and field demonstration
tests of the product. Under this interpretation, PHMSA's prior approval would not be required
for prototype shipments made only for the purpose of product performance and demonstration
testing (i.e. non-UN testing).
We want to make certain that we are in full compliance with the Department of
Transportation's lithium battery shipping requirements. In light of the ostensibly differing
explanations we have received about the scope of the testing regulation, your prompt response to
this inquiry would be appreciated.
Please feel free to contact me at (775) 856-2500 or Kenneth Mead, our outside
counsel with Baker Botts, LLP, at 202-639-7744, if you have any questions. Thank you in
advance for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Vice President and chief ~ a t e x o u n s e l
Altair Nanotechnologies, Inc.
204 Edison Way
Reno, Nevada 89502
(775) 856-2500
Alta~rnano, Inc.
204 Edison Way, Reno, NV 89502-2306
alta~rnano.coni
phone 775 856,2500 1 fax 775.856.161 9
- **truncated:** false
- **body characters:** 4749
