# Roadrunner Rocketry, Inc. — Hazardous Materials Safety Interpretation - **operation:** document - **citation:** 09-0088 - **title:** Roadrunner Rocketry, Inc. — Hazardous Materials Safety Interpretation - **source type:** guidance - **agency:** Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration - **status:** guidance - **official:** true - **published on:** 2010-06-03 - **effective on:** Not available - **summary:** 09-0088 response to Roadrunner Rocketry, Inc. concerning 178.602. - **machine formats:** - **json:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-09-0088.json - **markdown:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-09-0088.md - **app url:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-09-0088 - **source url:** https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretations/2009/090088.pdf **body:** <<>> U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE Washington, D.C. 20590 JUN 2 5 2010 Mr. Bob Korman President Roadrunner Rocketry, Inc. 116 Cascade Way Coppell, TX 75019 Ref. No. 09-0088 Dear Mr. Korman: This responds to your letter requesting clarification of the preparation requirements for testing non-bulk combination packaging and package designs under Subpart M of Part 178 of the Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR; 49 CFR Parts 171-180). Specifically, you ask whether a combination packaging design (e.g., UN 40), originally tested with inner packagings containing liquids, may be used to package solid materials without further testing. I apologize for the delay in responding to your letter and any inconvenience it may have caused. The HMR, at § 178.602, require each packaging and package to be closed in preparation for testing and tests to be carried out in the same manner as if prepared for transportation, including inner packagings in the case of combination packagings. Therefore, a combination packaging design originally tested with inner packagings containing liquids may not be used to package solid materials, as a single package or otherwise, without further testing. I trust this satisfies your inquiry. Please contact us if we can be of further assistance. Sincerely, ~~ Hattie L. Mitchell Chief, Regulatory Review and Reinvention Office of Hazardous Materials Standards <<>> Road Runner 5tevU'\~ c3 113 .S~ p~plos'l till Rocketry, Inc. Dq-O()~Q" 116 Cascade Way Coppell, TX 75019, 972-462-9220 Fax 1-866-280-6582 www.RoadrunnerRocketry.com April 8, 2009 Office of Hazardous Materials Standards Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration U.S. Department of Transportation East Building 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE Washington, DC 20590-0001 Attention: PHH-10 Sent via email to infocntr@DOT.gov Dear sirs: Roadrunner Rocketry, Inc. is writing to determine if a particular UN4G rated package is acceptable for shipping certain hazardous solids. Background Uline Corporation sells a line of UN4G boxes designed primarily for shipping liquids in gallon and quart containers. They can be seen online at www.uline.com/BL 5304/Hazardous-Materials-Box-Shippers. The boxes have a packaging code of Y, indicating their acceptability for Packing Group II and III materials. They are also marked S, indicating they are certified for use as combination packaging, or for single packaging intended to contain solids. However, a flap on the Uline boxes indicate that the box is "UN4G compliant only when all parts of combination package are used and assembled properly." Another flap lists those components: gallon (or quart) cans, locking rings, and foam inserts - components obviously used for shipping liquids. <<>> Roadrunner ships model rocket motors classified as 1.4C or 1.4S explosives, Packing Group II, instruction 134. These model rocket motors are solids and are packaged in inner packages as specified in instruction 134. Question Can Roadrunner use these Uline boxes as outer packaging to ship its solid products (in appropriate inner packaging as specified in instruction 134) without using the components specified on the flap of the boxes (cans, locking rings and foam inserts)? Another way of stating this is to ask whether it is correct to say that the statement on the box that it is "UN4G compliant only when all parts of the combination package are used ... " is only applicable to shipping liquids and that the box is compliant for shipping appropriate solids without the indicated components. I appreciate your prompt attention to this request as Roadrunner will shortly need to purchase additional UN4G packaging. Should you need clarification or additional information in order to answer my questions, please call me at 972-462-9220. Thank you. Sincerely, Bob Korman President Roadrunner Rocketry, Inc. - **truncated:** false - **body characters:** 3948