# North Carolina State Highway Patrol — Hazardous Materials Safety Interpretation - **operation:** document - **citation:** 09-0115 - **title:** North Carolina State Highway Patrol — Hazardous Materials Safety Interpretation - **source type:** guidance - **agency:** Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration - **status:** guidance - **official:** true - **published on:** 2009-07-06 - **effective on:** Not available - **summary:** 09-0115 response to North Carolina State Highway Patrol concerning 173.159, 177.834. - **machine formats:** - **json:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-09-0115.json - **markdown:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-09-0115.md - **app url:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-09-0115 - **source url:** https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretations/2009/090115.pdf **body:** <<>> U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration 1200 New Jersey Ave, S.E Washington, D.C. 20590 Trooper K.S. Herring North Carolina State Highway Patrol 2820 E. 10th Street Greenville, NC 27858 Ref. No. 09-0 1 15 Dear Trooper Herring: This responds to your April 28, 2009 letter requesting clarification of requirements applicable to the transportation of wet batteries under the Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR; 49 CFR Parts 1 7 1-1 80). Specifically, you ask for clarificatioil regarding our letter dated June 3, 2008 (Ref. No. 08-0067) to Mr. Dan Lane, of the Interstate Battery System of America, Inc., concerning loading and bracing of wet batteries in so-called "Mickey Body" trucks. In accordance with Cj 173.159(e)(2), wet electric storage batteries must be loaded or braced so as to prevent damage and short circuits in transit. A Mickey Body truck is designed so that the shelves in the compartments of the truck slope downward from the exterior toward the interior of the vehicle, and the shelves are covered with a slip-resistant surface. Our June 3, 2008 letter was intended to clarify that the loading methods described by Mr. Lane (i.e., the batteries are not stacked and, if the compartmeilt in which the batteries are loaded is not full, the batteries are placed tightly to the front and interior of the compartment) combined with the slip-resistant surface and the downward slope of the shelving used in the trucks sufficiently provides for the achievement of the performance standard in Cj 173.159(e)(2). The slip- resistant surface installed in a Mickey Body truck need not meet the definition of "friction mat" in 49 CFR Cj 393.5. Please be aware that transportation in Mickey Body trucks using the loading method addressed in our June 3, 2008 letter is one way to satisfy the performance standard in Cj 173.1 59(e)(2). There are a number of other loading methods that will satisfy the performance standard, including the use of non-conductive caps that entirely cover the terminals; utilizing cardboard, paper, wood, or similar materials to separate the batteries and cover the terminals; the use of friction mats or wooden pallets to secure the batteries against movement; or a combination of measures that will prevent damage and short circuits in transit. Batteries may be stacked provided they are secured in a manner that prevents damage and short circuits in transit. <<>> If evidence indicates that batteries are damaged or short circuited or turn over and leak while in transport, then the performance standard of tj 173.159(e)(2) is not achieved no matter what vehicle or loading method is used. If such evidence is found, the shipper or carrier may be subject to appropriate enforcement action. Note that shipments transported by highway or rail that fully comply with the requirements in tj 173.159(e) are not subject to ally other requirements of the HMR. I trust this satisfies your inquiry. Please contact us if we call be of further assistance. Hattie L. Mitchell Chief, Regulatory Review and Reinvention Office of Hazardous Materials Standards <<>> Beverly Eaves Perdue Governor R uben F. Young Sec f, tary Walter J. Wilson, Jr. Colonel North Carolina Department of Crime Control and Public Safety State Highway Patrol Location: 5 12 N. Salisbury Street Raleigh, NC 27604 (919) 733-7952 Mailing Address: 4702 Mail service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-4702 PHMSA Office of Hazardous Materials Standards East Building 1200 New Jersey Avenue. SE Washington, D.C. 20590-000 1 & He i;eg 28 April 2009 Associate Administrator, This letter is in response to your June 3, 2008 letter (Ref. No. 08-0067) concerning the requirements of Title 49 CFR 173.159(e) (1-4). Specifically our enforcement personnel have questions regarding the use of the "Mickey Body" trucks to transport wet batteries. For the purpose of this letter all questions posed are pertaining to the transportation of wet batteries in the "Mickey Body7' truck. The letter states that the batteries are required to be placed on a "slip- resistant7' covered surface. The definition of a slip-resistant surface can vary. Does the slip- resistant surface used have to be a manufactured "friction mat" as defined in FMCSR 393.5, or does a wooden fork-lift pallet suffice? The second issue is that the letter states that compliance is achieved if the majority of the batteries are wrapped in plastic, placed tightly to the fiont and interior of each compartment that is less-than-full, and the batteries are not stacked. The term "majority7' leaves a gray area as to whether the carrier is in compliance or not. Many new wet batteries come from the factory with and without plastic wrapping for protection. For roadside inspection purposes, would a majority be defined as more than one half? It is understood that the batteries must be placed tightly to the front and interior of each compartment that is less-than-full and not stacked. However, if the batteries are not placed tightly to the fiont and interior (visible space between each) or are stacked, does the carrier lose the CFR 173.159 exception? If stacked, does the top stack have to comply with CFR 177.834, or do both the bottom and top stack have to conform to CFR 177.834? CFR 173.159(e) (2) states: "The batteries must be loaded or braced so as to prevent damage and short circuits in transit (e.g. by the use of nopz-conductive caps that entirely cover the terminals) ". Does a carrier that utilizes cardboard, paper, wood, or similar material placed between the stacks of batteries with no other form of battery terminal protection meet the requirement of CFR 173.159(e)(2)? Does CFR 173.159(e) (2) require each individual battery terminal to be covered to prevent short circuits during transit? Thank you for your time and assistance in this matter. On my honor, I will never betray my badge, my integrity, my character, or the public trust. I will ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ a l l ~ always have the courage to hold myself and others accountable for our actions. I will always ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ d i ~ ~ d A~~~~~ uphold the constitution, my community, and the agency I serve. <<>> @& Trp. K.S. Herring North Carolina State Highway Patrol Troop "A" MCSAP 2820 E. loth St. Greenville, N.C. 27858 252.917.7309 - **truncated:** false - **body characters:** 6337