# Industrial Packaging Alliance of North America — Hazardous Materials Safety Interpretation - **operation:** document - **citation:** 10-0033 - **title:** Industrial Packaging Alliance of North America — Hazardous Materials Safety Interpretation - **source type:** guidance - **agency:** Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration - **status:** guidance - **official:** true - **published on:** 2010-03-12 - **effective on:** Not available - **summary:** 10-0033 response to Industrial Packaging Alliance of North America concerning 178.503. - **machine formats:** - **json:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-10-0033.json - **markdown:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-10-0033.md - **app url:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-10-0033 - **source url:** https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretations/2010/100033.pdf **body:** <<>> U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration MAn 1 2 2010 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE Washington, D.C. 20590 Mr. John McQuaid Industrial Packaging Alliance ofNorth America P.O. Box 100907 Arlington, VA 22210 Ref. No.: 10-0033 Dear Mr. McQuaid: This is in response to your January 21, 2010 letter regarding display ofpackage markings in accordance with the Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR; 49 CFR Parts 171-180). Specifically, you ask whether a label containing the information required by § 178.503(c) meets the permanency requirements of § 178.3. A reusable metal drum liable to undergo a reconditioning process must bear the marks identified in § 178.503(a)(1) through (a)(6) and (a)(9)(i) in a permanent form that is able to withstand the reconditioning process. Although it may be possible to permanently apply these marks in some other fashion (e.g. stamping or etching), embossing is the most common method of permanently marking steel drums. A label generally would not insure permanency. For a new metal drum with a capacity greater than 100 L, the permanent marks described in § 178.503(a)(1) through (a)(6) and (a)(9)(i), must appear on the bottom. Other required marks need not be permanent and may appear as part of a complete marking on the side or top of the drum. Again, a label generally would not insure permanency. If the capacity of the drum is less than or equal to 100 L the markings may be anywhere on the drum. I hope this answers your inquiry. If you have further questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Charles E. Betts Chief, Standards Development lice of Hazardous Materials Standards <<>> Drakeford, Carol From: Mazzullo, Ed (PHMSA) flJat'tlnCf'S () fa el.tl (J/~ Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 20107:19 AM J U V To: Drakeford, Carolyn (PHMSA) I () ='" ()0 Subject: FW: Inquiry on Markings of Packagings Pursuant to Section 178.3 Importance: High Please assign for response. Ed From: John McQuaid [mailto:mcquaid@industrialpackaging.org] Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2010 1:03 PM To: Mazzullo, Ed (PHMSA) Subject: Inquiry on Markings of Packagings Pursuant to Section 178.3 Importance: High Ed, I hope this note finds you well!! I am writing on behalf of a filler that utilizes 55-gallon steel drums manufactured in accordance with POP requirements to facilitate the export of lubricants through three Houston-area ports. An issue has arisen at one of the three ports used to export the product whereby Coast Guard personnel have recently begun to reject drums for loading in ISO shipping containers for export because the drums are marked with labels (described to me as 1" x 3" in dimension) containing the information required by § 178.503 to conform to the UN standard. According to my contact who fills these drums, under contract, for export and manages the supply chain process, his firm purportedly has been shipping this product through three Houston ports for almost a decade with these labels containing the required marking information. To be clear, these are UN-rated drums for export. The Coast Guard, in recently rejecting the packagings at one Houston port of debarkation, informed the party filling and handhng the packagings for export that they are in violation of 49 CFR 178.3 in that the markings on the drum are not stamped, embossed, burned, printed or otherwise marked on the packaging to provide adequate accessibility, permanency, contracts, and legibility so as to be readily apparent and understood. My question is: Does the 1" x 3" label containing the required information afftxed to the drum satisfy the requirements of § 178.3? I am concerned as to whether, at a minimum, the label as described meets the "permanency" requirements of § 178.3. Any assistance you and your staff can provide in clarifying this issue would be appreciated. As I mentioned, these are products for export. The apparent lack of consistency by Coast Guard personnel in relation to the acceptability of a labeling practice that, reportedly, has been standard practice by the steel drum manufacturers providing packagings to this f11ler for use in exporting product at the Houston ports for a decade requires clarification as soon as possible. Thank you! 1 <<>> John A. McQuaid mcquaicl(£idndustrialpackaging.org Industrial Packaging Alliance of North America NEW CONTACT INFORMATION: IPANA/SSCI P.O. BOX 100907 ARLINGTON, VA 22210 PHONE: 571.527.0779 FAX: 571.527.0781 CELL: 703.629.6239 (unchanged) HELP PRESERVE THE ENVIRONMENT; PRINT THIS EMAIL ONLY IF NECESSARY. CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT This electronic message transmission contains information from IPANA and is confidential or privileged. this information is intended only for the person or persons named above. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of any other action based on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. 2 - **truncated:** false - **body characters:** 4968