# Intertek — Hazardous Materials Safety Interpretation

- **operation:** document
- **citation:** 10-0173
- **title:** Intertek — Hazardous Materials Safety Interpretation
- **source type:** guidance
- **agency:** Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
- **status:** guidance
- **official:** true
- **published on:** 2010-10-13
- **effective on:** Not available
- **summary:** 10-0173 response to Intertek concerning 173.185.
- **machine formats:** - **json:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-10-0173.json
- **markdown:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-10-0173.md
- **app url:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-10-0173
- **source url:** https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretations/2010/100173.pdf
**body:**

<<<PAGE 1>>>

U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materia~s
Safety Administration
1200 New Jersey Ave, SE
Washington, D.C. 20590
OCT 1 3 2010
Mr. Rich Byczek
Site Manager
Intertek
13200 Levan Road
Livonia, MI 48150
Ref. No.: 10-0173
Dear Mr. Byczek:
This is in response to your August 17,2010, email requesting clarification ofrequirements in the
Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR; 49 CFR Parts 171-180) applicable to design-type testing
of lithium ion batteries. In your email, you describe a lithium ion battery module comprised of
electrically connected cells that serves as a component of a larger lithium battery pack. You state
this lithium ion battery module is transported between manufacturing facilities and thus is subject to
testing in accordance with the United Nations (l1N) Manual ofTests and Criteria. In your email,
you note this module is equipped with a protective insulator that prevents external access to the
battery terminals. You ask ifyou must remove the protective insulator to conduct the appropriate
tests or note that the terminals are inaccessible.
The specific requirements you address are contained in Section 38.3 ofthe UN Manual ofTests and
Criteria and are implemented through the provisions of § 173.185 ofthe HMR. Prior to
transportation in commerce, the lithium ion battery module must successfully pass all ofthe
applicable tests in Section 38.3 ofthe UN Manual of Tests and Criteria, including the T.5 (short
circuit test) and the T.7 (overcharge test). The lithium battery module must be subjected to all of
the appropriate design type tests in the same configuration as when it will be installed in the larger
battery pack. In this case if a physical barrier such as a cover must be removed prior to installation
in the larger battery pack, it must be removed for design type testing.
I hope this information is helpful. Ifyou have further questions, please contact this office.
Sincerely,
~.5~
Ben Supko
Acting Chief, Standards Development
Office of Hazardous Materials Standards

<<<PAGE 2>>>

Drakeford. Carolyn (PHMSA)
Learv{
§li3·-t~5
~+h iu m ]!:a.tJert'e.s
From: Betts, Charles (PHMSA) ID-O",~
Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2010 9:53 AM
To: Drakeford, Carolyn (PHMSA)
Subject: FW: Interpretation requested regarding test applicability for Lithium -Ion Batteries
Attachments: SN200241.jpg
From: Rich Byczek Intertek [mailto:rich.byczek@intertek.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 20109:46 AM
To: Betts, Charles (PHMSA)
Cc: Dawoomi Hong; Tom O'Hara Interteki Fadi Alawi Intertek
Subject: Interpretation requested regarding test applicability for Lithium -Ion Batteries
Charles,
My name is Rich Byczek, and I am the site manager for Intertek's Safety and Performance lab in Detroit Michigan.
I am writing you on behalf of our client, who had some questions related the UN Manual of Tests and Criteria, applicability
of tests.
Specifically, this client has a battery (rack of cells), which utilizes a protective insulator to prevent external access to the
battery terminals (photo attached).
It should be noted that this is an interim module-level part, the cells are electrically connected internal to the module, that
is later connected as part of a full battery pack.
This level does undergo transport between manufacturing facilities.
As a test lab performing the testing, how should we treat this sample for the short circuit (T5) and overcharge (T7) tests.
As the terminals are physically blocked, do I just note that the terminals are inaccessible, preventing an external short
circuit or overcharge condition? Or, do I remove/bypass the protective cover to gain access to the terminals.
Per client review, this feature is specifically added to prevent a short circuit or inadvertent voltage applied to the
terminals. Therefore they consider it to be a protective device. The concern is validity of removing this device to perform
the test, as this would be similar to bypassing a diode, fuse or other protective device.
I can be contacted via email or Mobile phone. My contact information is listed below.
Also, if there is a different contact I should use, please let me know.
Thank you,
Rich Byczek
Site Manager
Phone: 734-591-9161
Intertek
13200 Levan Road
Livonia, MI48150
Fax: 734-432-0555
Mobile: 248-219-1099
Rich. Byczek@intertek.com
www.intertek.com
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
1

<<<PAGE 3>>>
- **truncated:** false
- **body characters:** 4366
