# Railroad Commission of Texas — Hazardous Materials Safety Interpretation

- **operation:** document
- **citation:** 11-0055
- **title:** Railroad Commission of Texas — Hazardous Materials Safety Interpretation
- **source type:** guidance
- **agency:** Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
- **status:** guidance
- **official:** true
- **published on:** 2011-09-13
- **effective on:** Not available
- **summary:** 11-0055 response to Railroad Commission of Texas concerning 178.337, 180.413.
- **machine formats:** - **json:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-11-0055.json
- **markdown:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-11-0055.md
- **app url:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-11-0055
- **source url:** https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretations/2011/110055.pdf
**body:**

<<<PAGE 1>>>

U.S. Department of Transportation
Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety
Administration
S~p 1 3 2011
1200 New Jersey Ave" S.E.
Washington, DC 20590
Mr. James Osterhaus
Railroad Commission of Texas
1701 N. Congress
Austin, TX 78711
Ref. No.: 11-0055
Dear Mr. Osterhaus:
This responds to your March 3, 2011 letter requesting clarification of the Hazardous Materials
Regulations (HMR; 49 CFR Parts 171-180) applicable to M C 331 cargo tanks. Specifically,
you ask if the HMR permit the use of an excess flow valve and a manual shutoff valve instead
of an internal self-closing stop valve for MC 331 tanks with vapor or liquid discharge
openings greater than 1 '14 NPT, but have been modified using a bushing to reduce the
opening to less than 1 '14 NPT.
Under the HMR, an internal self-closing stop valve is not required for an MC 331 tank if the
vapor or liquid discharge opening is less than 1 '14 NPT (National Pipe Thread) and is
equipped with an excess flow valve together with a manually operated external stop valve
(§ 178.337-8(a)(5)(i». However, a change to the size ofthe opening on an MC 331 cargo
tank is considered a modification to the cargo tank and must satisfy all ofthe requirements of
the HMR that apply to cargo tank modification. Accordingly, the modification must be
performed by a repair facility holding a valld National Board Certificate of Authorization for
use of the National Board "R" stamp (§ 180.413(a)(I», and the design ofthe modified cargo
tank motor vehicle must be certified in writing by a Design Certifying Engineer as meeting
the structural integrity and accident damage protection requirements of the applicable
specification (§ 180.413( d)(1 ». Also, the person performing the modification must be
registered with the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration in accordance with Part 107,
Subpart F (§ 180.413(a)(3».
I trust this satisfies your inquiry. Please contact us if we can be of further assistance.
Ben Supko
Acting Chief, Standards Development Branch
Standards and Rulemaking Division

<<<PAGE 2>>>

Drakeford, Carolyn (PHMSA)
From: INFOCNTR (PHMSA) 1/-0055
Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2011 12:26 PM
To: Drakeford, Carolyn (PHMSA)
Subject: FW: Hazmat Information Center Feedback: Highway (Sections 177.800 &ndash; 177.870)
Hi Carolyn,
Mr. Osterhaus requested the below e-mail be submitted as a formal letter of interpretation.
He previously spoke with Chris Ludwa in the Info Center.
Thanks,
Victoria
Victoria Lehman
Hazmat Information Center (HMIC)
Pipeline & Hazardous Materials Safety Administration 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE,
E21-119 Washington, D.C. 20590
http://phmsa.dot.gov/hazmat/info-center
(202) 366-1035
-----Original Message----From:
PHMSA-Feedback [mailto:PHMSA-Feedback]
Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2011 3:05 PM
To: PHMSA HM InfoCenter; PHMSA Webmaster
Subject: Hazmat Information Center Feedback: Highway (Sections 177.800 &ndashj 177.870)
Secion 178.337-8(a)(5)(i)allows the use of an excess flow valve and a manual shutoff valve
instead of an internal self-closing stop valve for MC 331 container openings of less than
11/4 inch. If an MC331 container is manufactured with a 11/4 inch or larger opening and a
bushing is installed in the opening to reduce the opening to a size less than 11/4 inch, is
it acceptable to install an excess flow valve and a manual shutoff valve instead of an
internal self-closing stop valve?
Name: James Osterhaus
Organization: Railroad Commission of Texas
Email: james.osterhaus@rrc.state.tx.us
Address: 1701 N. Congress
City: Austin
Zip Code: 78711
Phone: 512-463-6692
FAX: 512-463-0649
1
- **truncated:** false
- **body characters:** 3601
