# Delta Air Lines, Inc. — Hazardous Materials Safety Interpretation - **operation:** document - **citation:** 11-0110 - **title:** Delta Air Lines, Inc. — Hazardous Materials Safety Interpretation - **source type:** guidance - **agency:** Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration - **status:** guidance - **official:** true - **published on:** 2011-06-22 - **effective on:** Not available - **summary:** 11-0110 response to Delta Air Lines, Inc. concerning 173.185, 175.30. - **machine formats:** - **json:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-11-0110.json - **markdown:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-11-0110.md - **app url:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-11-0110 - **source url:** https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretations/2011/110110.pdf **body:** <<>> U.S. Department 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE of Transportation Washington. DC 20590 Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration JUN 2 2 2011 Mr. Rick Blenkush Manager, Corporate Dangerous Goods Delta Air Lines, Inc. 1020 Delta Blvd Dept 043 Atlanta, Georgia 30320-6001 Ref. No. 11-0110 Dear Mr. Blenkush: This responds to your letter requesting clarification of the air shipment inspection requirements under the Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR; 49 CFR Parts 171-180). Specifically, you ask whether an air carrier, as specified in § 175.30, is obligated to inspect individual packages of hazardous materials conditionally excepted from any other requirements ofthe subchapter that are placed in a unit load device loaded by the shipper and offered to an air carrier for transportation. In your letter, you cite as an example the § 172.1 02( c)( 1) Special provision 188, which excepts packages of small lithium cells and batteries from any other requirements of the subchapter if certain conditions are met. Our response assumes all applicable conditions have been met. The answer is no. An air carrier is not obligated to inspect individual packages of hazardous materials conditionally excepted from the HMR that are placed in a unit load device loaded by the shipper and offered to an air carrier for transportation. Under § 175.30(b), an air carrier's responsibility in the scenario you describe would be to inspect the unit load device itself and not the contents contained therein, provided the shipper has produced any documentation required by Special provision 188, if applicable, and the unit load device is otherwise in an airworthy condition. I trust this satisfies your inquiry. Please contact us if we can be of further assistance. Sincerely, T. Glenn Foster Chief, Regulatory Review and Reinvention Branch Standards and Rulemaking Division <<>> stevens ~ nz .I()2 ~p IZ> ~ ~ 115·30 ~.DE LTA;~ L%'um Ba.~ries ll-OllO Delta Air Lines, Inc. 1020 Delta Blvd Dept 043 Atlanta, Georgia 30320-6001 June 1. 2011 Magdy EI-Sibaie, PhD Associate Administrator, Hazardous Materials Safety Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration US Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE East Bldg. Second Floor Washington, DC 20590-0001 SUBJECT: Request for Interpretation Dear Dr. EI-Sibaie: The purpose of this letter is to seek clarification on the interpretation of 49CFR 175.30 and its relationship to Special Provision 1 as. Multiple places in 49CFR the statement" ... are not subject to any other requirements of this subchapter if they meet the following:". What follows this statement is usually the provisions for emergency reporting, packaging requirements and shipping paper entries. The question posed is; if not specifically listed in the requirements that follow the above statement, is the carrier for an air shipment required to comply with all aspects of 49CFR 175.30, Inspecting Shipments? If the carrier is able to verify all the carrier's responsibilities of the requirements listed after "are not subject to any other requirements", then does the shipment need to be inspected per 175.30? As an example, this statement is used in 49CFR 172.102. Special Provision 1 aa. For shipper-prepared unit load devices that the shipper states are in compliance with the requirements listed in SP 188. is an air carrier allowed to transport these shipper prepared unit load devices without inspecting the packages in the shipper unit load device containing the lithium batteries in or with equipment? The unit load device itself would be inspected per 49CFR 175.30, but the individual packages inside of the unit load device would not be inspected per this regulation. We appreciate your assistance with this interpretation. If you have any additional questions or comments, then please contact me at 404-714-5634. Sincerely, ~ Rick Blenkush Manager - Corporate Dangerous Goods cc: Helen Howes. Managing Director - Safety, Health and Environment Brad Matheny, Manager - Cargo Field Support Jon-Peter Kelly, Senior Attorney - Law Department - **truncated:** false - **body characters:** 4103