# Spec Ops Company — Hazardous Materials Safety Interpretation

- **operation:** document
- **citation:** 11-0226
- **title:** Spec Ops Company — Hazardous Materials Safety Interpretation
- **source type:** guidance
- **agency:** Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
- **status:** guidance
- **official:** true
- **published on:** 2012-01-30
- **effective on:** Not available
- **summary:** 11-0226 response to Spec Ops Company concerning 171.8, 172.101, 173.219, 173.22.
- **machine formats:** - **json:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-11-0226.json
- **markdown:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-11-0226.md
- **app url:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-11-0226
- **source url:** https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretations/2011/110226.pdf
**body:**

<<<PAGE 1>>>

u.s. Department
of Transportation
Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety
Administration
JAN 30 l012
':::CO New Jersey Avenue SE
Washington. DC 20590
Mr. Jason Romero
Spec Ops Company
Bristow Bayou Road
Broussard, Louisiana 70518
Ref. No.: 11-0226
Dear Mr. Romero:
This responds to your e-mail to Mr. Shawn Wolsey ofPHMSA's Officeofthe Chief Counsel
regarding "Orange Smoke" used as a signaling device under the Hazardous Materials
Regulations (HMR; 49 CFR Parts 171-180). You enclosed a photograph of the device.
Based on a previous letter to another company concerning a life saving kit containing flares or
orange smoke bombs, in addition to other life saving devices, you believe that your product is the
same and should be described as "Life saving appliances, not self-inflating," in Class 9.
Specifically, you ask whether a material described as "Signal devices, hand, lAG, UNO191,
PGlI," is the correct shipping description for your orange smoke bombs, and if they may be
rec1assed and renamed as "Consumer Commodity, ORM-D", and shipped as such for purposes
of transportation in commerce.
You did not provide any detailed or specific information on the constituents or the hazard
characteristics of your product. Under 49 CFR §173.22, it is the shipper's responsibility to
properly classify and describe a hazardous material in accordance with Parts 172 and 173 of the
HMR. Such determinations are not required to be verified by this Office.
In your e-mail (6/20111), you described your product (orange smoke) as "Signal devices, hand,
lAG, UN0191, PGII." In accordance with the HMR, a material described as "Signal devices,
hand, lAG, UN0191, PGlI" must be offered and transported as such. In order to reclass and
rename your product as a "Consumer commodity, ORM-D," it must meet the definition of a
consumer commodity in § 171.8, and there must be a limited quantity packaging exception in
Column 8A ofthe § 172.1 01 Hazardous Materials Table (§ 172.101 HMT) for that entry that also
contains a provision allowing reclassification to consumer commodity. Therefore, since there
are no limited quantity packaging exceptions for the description "Signal devices, hand, lAG,
UN0191, PGlI," you may not reciass, rename or ship this product as a "Consumer Commodity,
ORM-D" in transportation in commerce.
For your information, a life-saving appiiance, self-inflating or not-self-inflating, in Class 9,
containing small quantities of hazardous materials that are required as part ofthe life-saving
appliance must conform to the requirements of § 173.219 (a) and (b). Such products may also not

<<<PAGE 2>>>

be shipped as a "Consumer commodity, ORM-D" in transportation in commerce because there
are no limited quantity packaging exceptions for that entry in the §172.1 01 HMT, and thus, no
consumer commodity provisions.
I hope this information is helpful. Ifwe can be of further assistance, please contact us.
Sincerely,
~S~
Ben Supko
Acting Chief, Standards Development Branch
Office of Hazardous Materials Standards

<<<PAGE 3>>>

Qrakeford. Carol
From: Supko, Ben (PHMSA) w .. Sa."''?j /tyf''''~
Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2011 8:26 AIIII
To: Drakeford, Carolyn (PHMSA) 11- DZ 'Z(, .
Subject: FW: Orange smoke Interpretation Letter request
Attachments: Re: Orange smoke; Re: Orange smoke; Re: Orange smoke; Re: Orange smoke; FW: Smoke
Signal; Untitled; Velocity Operations dismissal.pdf
Carolyn,
Please log as an interp. Please request that the specialist work with Shawn. The section is 173.219. The letter is for
Jason Romero, from Spec Ops company.
Thanks,
Ben
From: Wolsey, Shawn (PHMSA)
Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2011 9:45 AM
To: Supko, Ben (PHMSA)
Subject: Orange smoke Interpretation Letter request
Hi Ben,
I had seen that letter. This is the same concept. I suppose I need to ask for an official interpretation letter.
As background, he asked based on a letter that we had written to Velocity Operations that he found on our
website. The third paragraph addressing violations 3 and 4 is what he is basing his request on. I am attaching that
letter. We said that they had to be shipped as class 9.
In his June 22, 2011 email, he sent a picture of the flare in its screw cap container. He has 850 of them in his
garage to sell. He thinks that they are not regulated. UPS told him they are UN0191, signal devices, hand, 1.4G, PG II.
He wants to know how to ship them. He is hoping that they are ORM-D. I think they are Class 9, ifthey are in a kit or
something, otherwise, I think that UPS is correct.
I also sent him a picture of the Commercial Orange Smoke Bor:nbs that were involved in the Velocity case,
however, they were packaged in a life saving kit.
Thanks,
Shawn
Shawn C. Wolsey
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
Attorney-Advisor
Hazardous Materials Safety Law Division
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
PHC-10, Room E24-320
Washington, D.C. 20590
(202) 366-0299 (Phone)
(202) 366-7041 (Fax)
shawn .wolsey@dot.gov
1

<<<PAGE 4>>>

This transmission may contain material that is confidential, privileged, and/or attorney work product for the sole use ofthe intended
recipient. Any review. reliance, or distribution by others or forwarding without express permission is strictly prohibited. Public
availability is to be determined pursuant to the Freedom ofInformation Act, 5 USC 552.
From: Supko, Ben (PHMSA)
Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2011 9:09 AM
To: Wolsey, Shawn (PHMSA)
Subject: RE: Orange smoke
Here is a link to the letter that I signed on 8/30/11:
http://www.phmsa.dot.gov/portal/site/PHMSA/menuitem.ebdc7a8a7e39f2eSScf20310S0248aOc!?vgnextoid=ac6aacf9
9fb1231OVgnVCMlOOOOOlecb7898RCRD
From: Wolsey, Shawn (PHMSA)
Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2011 8:40 AM
To: Supko, Ben (PHMSA)
Subject: FW: Orange smoke
Hi Ben,
Shawn
Actually, this is what he is selling. The other picture was from my past case of the item in the kit.
Shawn C. Wolsey
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
Attorney-Advisor
Hazardous Materials Safety Law Division
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
PHC-10, Room E24-320
Washington, D.C. 20590
(202) 366-0299 (phone)
(202) 366-7041 (Fax)
shawn. wOlsey@dot.gov
This transmission may contain material that is conjidential, privileged, and/or attorney work productfor the sole lise ofthe intended
recipient. Any review, reliance, or distribution by others or forwarding without express permission is strictly prohibited. Public
availability is to be determined pursuant to the freedom ofInformation Act, 5 USC 552.
From: Jason Romero [mailto:southernjumper@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 3:41 PM
To: Wolsey, Shawn (PHMSA)
Subject: Re: Orange smoke
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 3:52 PM, Jason Romero <southemjumper@gmaiLcom>wrote:
Any time you would like
337-519-7826 you can call anytime if you would like
2

<<<PAGE 5>>>

·On Tue, lun 21,2011 at 3:51 PM, <shawn.wolsey@dot.gov> wrote:
M~·. Romero,
tomorrow?
I have been in meetings all day and I have not had the opportunity to return your call. What is a good time
Thanks,
Shawn
3
- **truncated:** false
- **body characters:** 7033
