# City Machine and Welding, Inc. — Hazardous Materials Safety Interpretation - **operation:** document - **citation:** 13-0042 - **title:** City Machine and Welding, Inc. — Hazardous Materials Safety Interpretation - **source type:** guidance - **agency:** Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration - **status:** guidance - **official:** true - **published on:** 2013-05-22 - **effective on:** Not available - **summary:** 13-0042 response to City Machine and Welding, Inc. concerning 173.302a, 180.205. - **machine formats:** - **json:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-13-0042.json - **markdown:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-13-0042.md - **app url:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-13-0042 - **source url:** https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretation%20Files/2013/130042.pdf **body:** <<>> U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE Washington, D.C. 20590 MAY 2 22013 Mr. Kent Carroll City Machine and Welding, Inc. P.O. Box 51018 Amarillo, TX 79159 Ref. No.: 13-0042 Dear Mr. Carroll: This is in response to your February 7, 2013 email requesting clarification ofthe requirements for the marking of a plus(+) sign on DOT 3A, 3AX, 3AA, 3AAX, and 3T cylinders as specified in § 173.302a(b) of the Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR; 49 CFR Parts 171-180). Specifically, you ask if a cylinder that passed the permanent expansion requirement, but exceeded the elastic expansion rejection limit (REE) may be returned to service (1) at the same or a lower service pressure or (2) 10 % in excess of its marked service pressure. The + sign is added following the test date marking on a cylinder to indicate that a cylinder complies with§ 173.302a(b) and is permitted to be filled to a pressure 10% in excess of its marked service pressure. All of the conditions in§ 173.302a(b) must be met, including compliance with either the average wall stress or the maximum wall stress limitations shown in § 173.302a(b)(3). If a cylinder has less than 10 % permanent expansion as demonstrated by the volumetric expansion test(§ 180.205(i)(l )(iv)), but fails the REE examination, the+ sign may not be marked on the cylinder after the requalification test date marking since the cylinder did not comply with the average wall stress requirement. In this case, the cylinder may be returned to service at its marked service pressure. As specified in§ 180.205(c)(3), for DOT specification cylinders, the marked service pressure may only be changed upon approval from the Associate Administrator for Hazardous Materials Safety and in accordance with written procedures specified in that approval. I hope this information is helpful. If you have further questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office. [[~· . Delmer Billings ~ Senior Regulatory Advisor Standards and Rulemaking Division <<>> .E,rakeford, Carolyn (PHMSA) From: INFOCNTR (PHMSA) Sent: To: Subject: Friday, February 08, 2013 2:08 PM Drakeford, Carolyn (PHMSA) FW: Cylinder service pressure change Hi Carolyn, We received the following request for a formal letter of interpretation. Thanks, Victoria From: Kent carroll [mailto:kcarroll@cmwelding.com] Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2013 5:54 PM To: INFOCNTR (PHMSA) Subject: Cylinder service pressure change Mr. Betts, We are a requalification facility (RIN 8620) and as part of re-affirmation of our current process, we would like to seek interpretation with regards to disposition of a cylinder which has passed the permanent expansion requirements but failed the elastic expansion rejection limit. The chain of references & cross references is listed below for convenience. • As part ofhydrostatic testing of3T ,3A, 3AA & 3AAX cylinders, we follow 49 CFR 180.205 and 180.205 (c) (3) for service pressure changes. • 180.205 requires complying with relevant sections of part 173 & part 178. • 49CFR 173.302a, references CGA Pamphlet C5 • 49CFR 171.7 lists CGA pamphlet C5 -1991 edition as referenced version in CFR. • CGA pamphlet CS under appendix A has a flow chart for service life control. • For the scenario of a cylinder passing the permanent expansion requirements but failing the elastic expansion rejection limit, the flow chart references Section 2.5 • Section 2.5 refers to Section 2.2 The point we would like to confirm is that in the scenario stated earlier, we can ultrasonically measure the wall thickness per the cylinder manufacturer's supplied procedure for the purposes of returning the cylinder back in service with a lower service pressure a) b) same as marked service pressure or a lower pressure 10% in excess of marked service pressure. Thanking you in anticipation . Best regards, Kent Carroll City Machine & Welding, Inc. 1 <<>> (806)358-7293 phone (806)358-7906 fax kcarroll@cmwelding.com This e-mail, including any attachments, is intended solely for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential, proprietary and/or non-public material. Except as stated above, any review, re-transmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than an intended recipient is prohibited. If you receive this in error, please so notify the sender and delete the material from any media and destroy any printouts or copies. No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG- www.avg.com Version: 9.0.932 I Virus Database: 2639.1.1/5587- Release Date: 02/07/13 01:37:00 2 - **truncated:** false - **body characters:** 4708