# Public Utilities Commission of Ohio Transportation Department — Hazardous Materials Safety Interpretation

- **operation:** document
- **citation:** 13-0127
- **title:** Public Utilities Commission of Ohio Transportation Department — Hazardous Materials Safety Interpretation
- **source type:** guidance
- **agency:** Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
- **status:** guidance
- **official:** true
- **published on:** 2013-08-07
- **effective on:** Not available
- **summary:** 13-0127 response to Public Utilities Commission of Ohio Transportation Department concerning 172.205, 172.328, 173.22.
- **machine formats:** - **json:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-13-0127.json
- **markdown:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-13-0127.md
- **app url:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-13-0127
- **source url:** https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretation%20Files/2013/130127.pdf
**body:**

<<<PAGE 1>>>

U.S. Department of Transportation
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Adminisfl'atlon
1200 New Jersey Ave, S.E.
Washington, D.C. 20590
Mr. Tom Forbes
Hazardous Materials Specialist
Public Utilities Commission of Ohio
Transportation Department
180 E Broad Street, 4th Floor
Columbus, OH 43215
Ref. No. 13-0127
Dear Mr. Forbes:
This responds to your June 12, 2013 email seeking clarification of the shipping paper and
placarding requirements for waste hazardous materials under the Hazardous Materials
Regulations (HMR; 49 CFR Parts 171-180). Specifically, in your email you indicate that a
mixture of bulk waste hazardous materials (1,270 gallons ofUN1263, RQ, Waste Paint Related
Material, 3, PGII, and 150 gallons ofUN1992, RQ, Waste Flammable Liquid, Toxic, n.o.s., 3
(6.1), PG II (Methanol/Acetnitrile)) is vacuum loaded in a single compartment DOT 412 cargo
tank.
You indicate that during a roadside inspection of this single compartment DOT 412 cargo tank,
it was noted that the truck was displaying flammable placards with ID Number UN 1263 on all
four sides. In addition the driver provided the inspector with six hazardous waste manifests for
material in the cargo tank. Five of the waste manifests identified the material as UN1263, with
a total of 1,270 gallons. The other manifest identified the material as UN1992 with a total of
150 gallons. Your questions are paraphrased and answered below.
Ql. Is the UN1263 marking inside the flammable liquid placard the proper hazard
communication for the mixture contained in the cargo tank?
AI. No. Section 172.334(d) requires that a placard bearing an identification number
may not be used to meet the requirements of subpart F of part 172 unless it is the correct
identification number for all hazardous materials of the same class in the transport
vehicle or freight container on which it is displayed. Since the cargo tank contained a
new material consisting of a mixture of two hazardous materials, waste paint related
material and waste flammable liquid, toxic, n.o.s., the identification number UN1263
displayed on the cargo tank did not accurately communicate the new material in the tank
and, consequently, did not comply with§ 172.334(d). If the cargo tank contained only
the UN1263, waste paint related material, then the UN1263 identification number
marking on the flammable hazard warning placard would be in compliance with the

<<<PAGE 2>>>

identification marking requirements specific to cargo tanks in § 172.328, and the
marking on placards specifications in§ 172.332(c).
Q2. Is it permissible to use the original waste manifests for the mixture of materials
loaded into the cargo tank as the shipping paper, or is the shipping paper for the mixture
required?
A2. Yes. A shipping paper for the mixture is required. Section 172.205(a) specifies
that no person may transport a hazardous waste unless a hazardous waste manifest is
prepared in accordance with 40 CFR 262.20 and is signed, carried and given as required
of that person. Section 172.200(a) requires each person who offers a hazardous material
for transportation to describe the hazardous material on a shipping paper. Commingling
and subsequent transportation of separately manifested hazardous wastes must be
reflected on a shipping paper that accurately describes the hazardous material in its
revised state. By mixing the materials together, the driver has created a different
material, with potentially different hazard properties than the properties the materials
exhibited separately. The hazard class is determined through analysis of the chemical
composition and hazard properties ofthe combined material. Section 172.200(a) further
requires that the total quantity and type of packaging be indicated on the shipping paper
(e.g., 1 cargo tank, 1,420 gallons vs. 5 IBCs 1,270 gallons and 3 drums 150 gallons).
The shipper is responsible for properly classifying, packaging, marking and labeling a
hazardous material for transportation in commerce. In this instance, the driver has
assumed functions of the shipper by mixing these materials. As such, as provided in
§ 173.22, the driver is responsible for complying with all applicable shipper functions.
I hope this answers your inquiry. If you need additional assistance, please contact this office at
202-366-8553.
Sincerely,
fOr Robert Benedict
Chief, Standards Development Branch
Standards and Rulemaking Division

<<<PAGE 3>>>

0' Donne{/
~ 172-· 10/
5 l{fy J.Pv
Drakeford, Carolyn (PHMSA)
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
INFOCNTR (PHMSA)
Wednesday, June 12, 2013 2:50PM
Drakeford, Carolyn (PHMSA)
FW: PHMSA Interpretation Request
Hi Carolyn,
This caller requested we submit this e-mail as a formal letter of interpretation.
Thanks,
Victoria
From: Forbes, Tom [mailto:Tom.Forbes@puc.state.oh.us]
Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2013 9:39AM
To: PHMSA HM InfoCenter
Subject: PHMSA Interpretation Request
Dear Sir or Madame:
I am requesting a written interpretation/clarification on the Hazardous Materials Regulatory Requirements for the
following situation an Ohio Inspector encountered during a roadside inspection.
A single compartment DOT 412 vacuum loaded Cargo Tank was stopped for inspection. The truck was displaying
flammable placards with ID Number 1263 in the placard on all four sides. The driver provided the inspector six hazardous
waste manifests for materials he had picked up from other packages at several stops and vacuum loaded on this cargo
tank. Five of the Waste Manifests identified the material as UN1263, RQ, Waste Paint Related Material, 3,PGII (No name
or code listed for hazardous substance as required), 1 TT with a total of 1270 gallons the other manifests identified the
material as UN1992, RQ, Waste Flammable liquid, Toxic, NOS, 3(6.1), PGII (Methanol/Acetonitrile), 1 TT, 150 Gallons.
I have two basic questions.
1. Is the cargo tank properly marked and placarded while displaying the flammable placards with 1263 ID number inside
the placard? IF not how should have it been placarded/marked?
2. Is it permissible to use the original waste manifests for the material loaded as the shipping paper or is a shipping paper
for the mixture required?
Thanks you for your assistance on this matter.
Tom Forbes
Public Utilities Commission of Ohio
Transportation Department
180 E Broad Street, 4th Floor
Columbus, Ohio 43215
Hazardous Materials Specialist
(614) 644-0296
PUCO.ohio.gov
llc
1
- **truncated:** false
- **body characters:** 6413
