# Lighter Association, Inc. — Hazardous Materials Safety Interpretation

- **operation:** document
- **citation:** 14-0034
- **title:** Lighter Association, Inc. — Hazardous Materials Safety Interpretation
- **source type:** guidance
- **agency:** Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
- **status:** guidance
- **official:** true
- **published on:** 2014-03-25
- **effective on:** Not available
- **summary:** 14-0034 response to Lighter Association, Inc. concerning 173.308.
- **machine formats:** - **json:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-14-0034.json
- **markdown:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-14-0034.md
- **app url:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-14-0034
- **source url:** https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretation%20Files/2014/140034.pdf
**body:**

<<<PAGE 1>>>

1. 2. 3. U.S. Department
of Transportation
Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety
Administration
I 200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
Washington. 0 C 20590
MAR 2 5 2014
David H. Baker, Esq.
General Counsel
Lighter Association, Inc.
1701 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Suite 300
Washington, D.C. 20006
Ref. No.: 14-0034
Dear Mr. Baker:
This responds to your February 19, 2014letter and previous conversations with members of
my staff requesting clarification ofthe Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR; 49 CFR
Parts 171-180) applicable to lighters. In your letter, you describe a difficulty in attempting to
comply with the shipping paper and marking requirements in§§ 173.308(d) and (e).
According to your letter, you state that:
A lighter company must place each and every lighter design report identifier on the outer
package for the shipment. In the case of many companies, this means that they must place
20 or more LAAs on the outer packaging. This is extremely cumbersome as there is only so
much room on the corrugated box used for these shipments. In addition, companies are
routinely adding new lighters to their product line, and, therefore, new LAA numbers must
be added regularly to the packaging. Hence, boxes must be thrown out and new boxes
ordered, with the new LAA number added.
Additionally, you summarize three alternatives informally discussed with the Pipeline and
Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) staff that could satisfy these
requirements for lighters. These alternatives are paraphrased below:
Place all of the LAA numbers for the company on each box and simply place whatever
lighter was being shipped in the box.
Place every LAA number on the box with little boxes (squares) next to the approval number
and check off exactly what lighters are in the box by manually putting a check mark in the
applicable square.
Place the predominant approval numbers on the outer packaging. If a lighter company sold
twenty lighters, they could place the approval number for the five predominant lighters on
the outer packaging.

<<<PAGE 2>>>

Finally, you ask PHMSA to allow the outer packaging and shipping papers for approved
lighters to be marked as follows (in lieu of the current HMR requirements provided in
§§ 173.308(d) and (e)):
LIGHTERS: In compliance with 49 Part 173.308
Paragraph (d) of§ 173.308 prescribes the shipping paper and package marking requirements
for lighters. Prior to publication on January 23,2006 [71 FR 3418] ofthe final rule entitled
"Hazardous Materials: Requirements for Lighters and Lighter Refills," under Docket No.
RSPA-2004-18795 (HM-237), the previous shipping paper and marking requirements
required packages of lighters to be marked and shipping papers to be annotated with the
approval numbers assigned by PHMSA. ·After the January 1, 2007 effective date of the
HM-237 final rule, we instead require the identification code and test report identifier to be
annotated on a shipping paper, in association with the basic description, and marked on a
package, for all designs contained therein.
The consistency in pertinent information is important, as the shipping paper notation and
package marking requirements enable enforcement personnel to identify the person who
tested and approved the lighters for transportation should they identify a problem with the
shipment.
In paragraph (e) of§ 1 73 .3 08, we continue to allow the exception from Subparts C through
H of Part 172, and Part 177, for no more than 1,500 lighters carried aboard a transport
vehicle by highway. This exception allows for the use of non-specification outer packaging
meeting the general requirements of Subpart B of Part 1 73. This paragraph does not,
however, contain an exception from marking the test report identifier on the outer package
because of the potential for transportation by common or contract carriage. In all cases, the
test report identifier marking is the only information available to enforcement personnel and
carriers to identify the types of lighters that are contained in a package and to ascertain
whether the lighters have been examined in accordance with the HMR. Distributors should
be aware of the test report identifiers for each design type in their inventory.
We agree that marking the outside of the packaging may impose a burden on distributors. At
the same time, we maintain our belief that some record of the test report identifiers for
lighters transported in a package must be available to enforcement personnel and carriers
during transportation. Therefore, we cannot authorize the fourth alternative you requested.
Nonetheless, to alleviate the possible burden on distributors, we do allow a list of test report
identifiers to be included inside, or attached to the outside of a package as a means of
complying with the requirement.
If you believe a rulemaking change, such as a revision, addition, or deletion is warranted, we
invite you to file a petition in accordance with§§ 106.95, 106.100 and 106.105 of the HMR,
including all information needed to support your petition. Your request will be further
evaluated for merit to address in an upcoming rulemaking. For regulations in 49 CFR Parts
171 through 180, please submit the petition to: Standards and Rulemaking Division, Pipeline
and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, PHH-10, U.S. Department of
2

<<<PAGE 3>>>

Transportation, East Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
Please contact Mr. Steven Andrews in the Regulatory Review and Reinvention Branch of the
Standards and Rulernaking Division at 202-366-8553 for more information.
I trust this satisfies your inquiry. Please contact us if we can be of further assistance.
Sincerely,
T. Glenn Foster
Chief, Regulatory Review and Reinvention Branch
Standards and Rulernaking Division
3

<<<PAGE 4>>>

LIGHTER ASSOCIATION, INC.
1701 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Suite 300
Washington, D.C. 20006
~,li£ht~rll~f>Q~~!f!1!9!1.Qr.g
(202) 253 4347
david.baker@lighterassociation.org
VIA EMAIL AND HAND DELIVERY
December 5, 2012
Mr. Michael Stevens
Office of Hazardous Materials Standards
Pipeline & Hazardous Materials Administration
U.S. Department of Transportation
1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E
Washington, D.C. 20590
Re: Request for Interpretation Regarding Placement of Approval Numbers for
Lighters on Outer Packagings and Shipping Papers
Dear Mr. Stevens:
We are writing to you about an issue which has been particularly difficult for the lighter
industry.
As you know, under the "new" PHMSA lighter regulation (71 Fed. Reg. 3427, January
23, 2006; as amended at 73 Fed. Reg. 57006, October 1, 2008), individual approvals are
issued for each lighter design reviewed for "gas escapage" and a specific approval
number is designated for that lighter. 49 CFR Part 173.308(b)(4)(i)(C). Under 49 CFR
Part 173.308(d)(2), these approval numbers must then be set forth on the outer packaging
for the lighter. This framework worked perfectly fine, under the old regulation, when a
single T number was issued to a company for all of its lighters. The company simply
placed the T number on its outer packaging and used it for all lighter shipments.
However, under the new regulation, it appears that companies have to place every LAA
number on the outer packaging. As stated in the new lighter regulation:
" ... a lighter design test report identifier ... must be marked on a paekaging containing
lighters."' 49 CFR Part 173.308( d)(2).
While the language speaks in the singular, "a lighter design report identifier", it has been
generally interpreted to mean all identifiers must be marked on the: outer packaging.

<<<PAGE 5>>>

Moreover, this point is clarified further in Part 173.308(e), Exceptions, stating:
"In addition, the package must include the test report identifier for each lighter design ... "
So under the new regulation, a lighter company must place each and every lighter design
report identifier on the outer package for the shipment. In the case of many companies,
this means that they must place 20 or more LAAs on the outer packaging. This is
extremely cumbersome as there is only so much room on the corrugated box used for
these shipments. In addition, companies are routinely adding new lighters to their
product line, and, therefore, new LAA numbers must be added regularly to the
packaging. Hence, boxes must be thrown out and new boxes ordered, with the new LAA
number added.
The cost of modifying packaging each time a new LAA number has to be added is
enormous. New packaging costs tens of thousands of dollars (because it is much more
cost effective to purchase large quantities) and testing of a packaging is expensive
(ranging from $800 to $2000 or more).
The same situation applies to printing all of the LAA numbers on the shipping papers.
Large retailers are complaining to Lighter Association members that it could hundreds of
thousands of dollars to change their computer programs to print fifteen, twenty or thirty
LAA numbers on the shipping paper.
And the logistics of keeping track of what lighters are in the box (outer packaging) are
extraordinary. Because each box may contain a different assortment of lighters, under
the new system, each box shipped must be manually examined by an employee to be
certain that the lighters in the box match the LAA numbers on the box. As a result, lighter
companies with many different models, have been forced to hire additional employees
simply to ensure that the lighters that go in the box meet exactly the particular LAA
numbers pre-printed on the box.
Lighter Association representatives have raised this issue informally with PHMSA staff
and have received varying guidance on how to respond to this problem.
One suggestion was to place all of the LAA numbers for the company on each box and
simply place whatever lighter was being shipped in the box. In this manner, the box
always contained the LAA number for a lighter being shipped.
Another suggestion was to place every LAA number on the box with little boxes
(squares) next to the approval number and check off exactly what lighters are in the box
by manually putting a check mark in the applicable square.
Yet another discussion was to follow the example of the interpretation issued many years
ago to the fireworks industry for assortment packages and place the predominant
approval numbers on the outer packaging. This process was codified at 49 CFR Part

<<<PAGE 6>>>

172.320( c), so today an explosives company shipping more than five products in the
same box, can place five approval numbers on the box and ship any number of Division 1
items. Similarly, the logic followed that if a lighter company sold twenty lighters, they
could place the approval number for five lighters on the outer packaging. This concept
was discussed at our November 2011 meeting at PHMSA.
The Lighter Association believes that this is a problem that falls under the "no harm- no
foul" aphorism. All outer packagings utilized by Association members contain the
following information:
Division 2.1 Lighters
Company Name or Brand
Flammable
Flammable Symbol
Approval Number
So there is absolutely no doubt for the first responder what is in the packaging - it
contains lighters with a tiny amount of butane fuel (50 to 80 mg). In the unlikely event of
an issue with the transportation of the lighters, the first responder would immediately
know the Hazardous Materials Classification for the product and the safety risk. The
addition of a long listing of LAA numbers does not add any relevant information to the
situation. Moreover, there has not been an issue involving the transportation oflighters
in at least 25 Y'~ars. So there is no safety risk, regardless of what resolution is settled
upon here.
Frankly, even though the Association actively participated in the rulemaking on the
revision to Part 173.308 from 2004 to 2006, we suspect that no one considered this point
when adding the requirement of individual LAA numbers for each lighter. So now we
have a situation where some of our members must place 20 or more approval numbers on
an outer packaging, then discard it when a new lighter is added. This is certainly not
consistent with the overall national and state policy to recycle and to reduce energy
consumption.
The Lighter Association respectfully requests that PHMSA stay all enforcement activity
related to this issue, since 100% technical compliance with this requirement serves no
apparent purpose and is virtually impossible given the large variety of lighters shipped.
We are not aware of any enforcement activity on this precise issue, but it is a concern of
our members since, like all offerors, they are subject to periodic PHMSA inspections.
More importantly, the Lighter Association respectfully requests that an interpretation be
issued stating that the outer packaging and shipping papers for approved lighters can be
marked as follows:

<<<PAGE 7>>>

LIGHTERS: In compliance with 49 Part 173.308
This would eliminate manual checking off of boxes and would be more comprehensive
than the exception for the explosives industry. Moreover, it would meet the needs of
PHMSA and first responders as they would know exactly what is in the box. There really
is no reason for them to know the various approval numbers. Accordingly, we would
respectfully request that an interpretation letter to this effect be issued.
Thank you for your consideration of our concerns.
Very truly yours,
David H. Baker
General Counsel
DHB:bd
- **truncated:** false
- **body characters:** 13483
