# Thompson Tank Inc. — Hazardous Materials Safety Interpretation

- **operation:** document
- **citation:** 14-0042
- **title:** Thompson Tank Inc. — Hazardous Materials Safety Interpretation
- **source type:** guidance
- **agency:** Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
- **status:** guidance
- **official:** true
- **published on:** 2014-08-22
- **effective on:** Not available
- **summary:** 14-0042 response to Thompson Tank Inc. concerning 178.348.
- **machine formats:** - **json:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-14-0042.json
- **markdown:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-14-0042.md
- **app url:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-14-0042
- **source url:** https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretation%20Files/2014/140042.pdf
**body:**

<<<PAGE 1>>>

of Transportation
U.S. Department
Materials Safet
ipeline and Hazardou:
Washington, D.C. 20590
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
Administration
AUG 2 2 2014
Mr. David L. Thompson
Thompson Tank, Inc.
P.O. Box 790
Lakewood, CA 90714-0790
Ref. No. 14-0042
Dear Mr. Thompson:
This is a response to your February 26, 2014 letter requesting clarification of the Hazardous
Materials Regulations (HMR; 49 CFR Parts 171-180) with regard to the manufacture of
DOT specification cargo tanks. This letter requests further clarification of a previous
interpretation (Reference No. 13-0207R; see enclosed). Specifically, you seek clarification
on the design, construction and certification of DOT 412 cargo tanks designed to be loaded
by vacuum. You ask if a vacuum loaded DOT 412 cargo tank having a 15 psig external
maximum allowable working pressure (MAWP) must be designed, constructed and certified
in accordance with the ASME Code and stamped on the ASME name plate.
Specification DOT 412 cargo tanks designed to be loaded by vacuum must have a minimum
external MAWP of 15 psig and a minimum internal MAWP of 25 psig in accordance with
be constructed and certified in accordance with Section VIII of the ASME Code, in
§ 178.348-1(c). A DOT 412 cargo tank designed to be vacuum loaded would be required to
accordance with § 178.348-1(e)(1) and the name plate must be stamped accordingly. This
requirement does not distinguish between internal and external MAWP, therefore a DOT 412
than 15 psig must be constructed and certified in accordance with the ASME Code,
cargo tank designed to be vacuum loaded and manufactured with an internal MAWP greater
irrespective of the external MAWP.
I hope this information is helpful. If you have any more questions, please do not hesitate to
contact this office.
Sincerely,
Rht Sulat
Robert Benedict
Chief, Standards Development
Standards and Rulemaking Division

<<<PAGE 2>>>

ASME - D.O.T CERTIFICATION
THOMPSON TANK, INC.
D.O.T. INSPECTION - TESTING
DESIGN ENGINEERING • CONSTRUCTION
THOMPSON VACUUM-PRESSURE UNITS
Suchak
$178.345-1
$178.348-1
february 26, 2014
8118.347-1
U.S. DOT
PHMSA Office of Hazardous Material
Cargo Tanks
Standards
Attn: PHH-10
14-0042
East building
1200 New Jersey Ave., SE.
Washington, DC 20590-0001
Gentlemen,
Subject: Vacuum Loading Reference No. 13-0207
We received your interpretation Ref No.: 13-0207 and find your statements
directed at a DOT 412 Cargo Tank to be very confusing.
The DOT 412 Vacuum-Loaded Cargo Tank is typically designed, constructed
and 15 PSI External MAWP.
and certified in accordance with the ASME Code for 50 PSI Internal MAWP
Item No. 1.
Must the 15 PSI External MAWP be designed, constructed,
and certified in accordance with the ASME Code and stamped
on the ASME Specification Plate.
Item No. 2.
Must the 15 PSI External MAWP be designed and
certified.
constructed in accordance with the ASME Code, but not
Note: If the DOT-412 Vacuum-Loaded Cargo Tank is really designed and
constructed in accordance with the ASME Code for 15 PSI External
MAWP the additional cost for Certification is "ZERO." It is already
being ASME Code Certified for the internal pressure condition. A
very small inconvenience for such a large degree of safety.
MAILING: POST OFFICE BOX 790, LAKEWOOD, CA 90714-0790
SHIPPING: 8029 PHLOX STREET, DOWNEY, CA 90241
PHONE: (562) 869-7711 • FAX: (562) 869-7214 • OUT OF STATE: (800) 421-7545

<<<PAGE 3>>>

Please consider that a DOT 407 Specification Vacuum-Loaded Cargo Tank
must comply with Item No. 1 and is in a less severe service.
Also that a DOT 412 cannot haul flammable products without the
temperature actuated shut-off system required for a DOT 407.
Enclosed for your evaluation is an email from Truck Trailer Manufacturer
Association (TTMA) regarding regulation proposals to PHSMA and e-mail
sent by Danny Shelton.
Sincerely,
David L. Thompson
Thompson Tank, Inc.
DLT: rb
Encl (1 - email from TTMA
2- email from Danny Shelton)

<<<PAGE 4>>>

ompson Tank Inc
Sent:
rom:
To:
Wednesday, December 03, 2008 7:55 AM
Attachments:
Subject:
W: Vacuum tank
hompson Tank Ir
vac tanks Recommendation for 218.doc
Mr. Dave
And the saga continues
From: Jeff Sims [mailto:Jeff@ttmanet.org]
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2008 6:11 AM
To: Andre Bourgault; Anthony Van Houdt; Bruce Yakley; Bryan Van De Vyvere; Bryan Yielding ; cfoshe@acrotrailer.com;
Girard ; David Perry; David Wagoner; Don Lang; Donnie Alford; Duane Plumski ; Ed Mansell ; Gary Christen; Gary
Chad Betts; Chris Budniak; Daniel Tremblay ; Dave Adams; Dave Shannon; David Bailey; David Ball; David Burke; David
Spoelstra; Harvey Wallenstein; Jack Mueliner; Jack Rademacher ; Jim Lawler; Jim Pflum; Joe Calonge; Joe House ; Lee
Hancock ; Leona Busse; Loy McGee ; Mike Barker; Nathan Roe ; Nick Paulick; Pascal Thibault ; Peter Weis; Ray Heelan;
Raymond Schaffer; Rick Connelly; Rick Fahl; Robert Lane; Rosemary Muellner; Russ Hamilton; Scott Hevelone; Sean
Wayne Roderick
Andersen; Steven McWilliams ; Thomas Ballon ; Thomas Determan; Timothy Rabe; Tom Hitchcock; Vaughn DeVorse ;
Subject: Vacuum tanks
Good Morning to all,
vacuum" clearer in the regulations.
The attached wording is being proposed to PHMSA in an attempt to make "loaded by vacuum" and "built to withstand full
They are attempting to get this into 218f a non-significant regulation that will not have a comment period, so if we have
any heartburn with the wording now is time to discuss it.
Have a great day!
Jeff Sims
TTMA - Engineering Manager
703-549-3014 Fax
703-549-3010 phone
www.ttmanet.org

<<<PAGE 5>>>

178.347-1 (c) states that "Any cargo tank built to this specification with a MAWP greater
than 35 psig and each tank designed to be loaded by vacuum must be constructed and
certified in conformance with Section VIII of the ASME Code (IBR, see §171.7 of this
least 15 psi."
subchapter). The external design pressure for a cargo tank loaded by vacuum must be at
178.347-4(b) goes on to say that vacuum relief devices are not required for cargo tanks
designed to be loaded by vacuum or built to withstand full vacuum.
This wording is confusing and creates the appearance that a cargo tank motor vehicle
designed to be loaded by vacuum referenced in 178.347-1(c) and cargo tank motor
vehicles built to withstand full vacuum referenced in 178.347-4(b) are not required to
have vacuum relief devices because they are required to be constructed and certified in
accordance with the ASME Code. One can reach this conclusion because in both cases
the "loaded by vacuum and built to withstand full vacuum" mean that the cargo tank wall
psi.
must meet the structural integrity requirements to withstand an external pressure of 15
There is a clear distinction and intent between the phrase "designed to be loaded by
vacuum" and "built to withstand full vacuum". We believe that if a cargo tank
manufacturer designs a cargo tank "to withstand full vacuum" that this tank is not
required to be certified in conformance with Section VIII of the ASME Code but we also
believe that a cargo tank that is loaded by vacuum is required to be constructed and
certified in accordance with Section VIII of the ASME Code. The intent of the final user
of the equipment will determine whether a tank will be vacuum loaded and required to be
a "U" stamped vessel versus a cargo tank that is designed to withstand full vacuum to
ensure the tank is not sucked in because of product cooling or during unloading and as a
products being transported.
result of the cooling of the product suck in moisture from the air and contaminate the
We believe it was also the intent of the Department to allow for cargo tanks that are
designed to withstand full vacuum but are not "U" stamped vessels to be able to take
advantage of the exception in 178.347-4(b). The enforcement community can easily
determine by inspecting the accessory equipment installed on the cargo tank motor
vehicle and determine if this cargo tank motor vehicle is being loaded by vacuum. Once
that has been determined simply verify that the cargo tank motor vehicle has a "U" stamp
and compliance with the requirements have been verified. If, however the cargo tank
and the intent of the Department is also clear and concise.
motor vehicle is not a "U" stamped vessel then non-compliance has also been verified
follows.
Because of the confusion we intend to clarify section 178.347-1(c) and 178.347-4(b) as
§178.347-1 General Requirements

<<<PAGE 6>>>

178.347-1 (c) Any cargo tank motor vehicle built to this specification with a MAWP
greater than 35 psig or each tank motor vehicle designed be loaded by vacuum must be
constructed and certified in conformance with Section VIII of the ASME Code (IBR, see
§171.7 of this subchapter). The external design pressure for a cargo tank loaded by
vacuum must be at least 15 psi.
(d) Each cargo tank motor vehicle built to this specification with MAWP of 35 psig or
less or designed to withstand full vacuum but not be loaded by vacuum must be
"constructed in accordance with Section VIII of the ASME Code" except as modified.
§178.347-4 Pressure Relief
(b) Type and construction. Vacuum relief devices are not required for cargo tank motor
withstand full vacuum in accordance with 178.347-1(d).
vehicles designed to be loaded by vacuum in accordance with 178.347-1 (c) or built to

<<<PAGE 7>>>

D.L. Thompson
From:
Sent:
Danny Shelton <shelton10104@gmail.com>
To:
Wednesday, February 26, 2014 11:24 AM
'Peter Weis'; Duane Plumski; John Cannon; anthony.vanhoudt@bealltrailers.com; Jack
Cc:
Rademacher
Subject:
Tom A. Rogers (Work); Mike Pitts; D. L. Thompson
Attachments:
Cargo tanks Designed to be loaded by Vacuum
Certified ASME Vacuum 13-0207 2.18.2014 pdf
Please see the attached interpretation from PHMSA dated February 18, 2014 in response to Dave Thompson's
inquiry. Based on this interpretation it is my professional opinion that a cargo tank motor vehicle that is designed to
loaded by vacuum must be constructed and certified in accordance with the ASME Code. I believe that also means that
and if it is a design consideration then the ASME Data Plate must be marked.
the ASME Data Plate must be marked with a minimum external pressure of 15 because that is a design consideration
Regards
- **truncated:** false
- **body characters:** 10229
