# S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc. — Hazardous Materials Safety Interpretation

- **operation:** document
- **citation:** 14-0194
- **title:** S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc. — Hazardous Materials Safety Interpretation
- **source type:** guidance
- **agency:** Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
- **status:** guidance
- **official:** true
- **published on:** 2015-03-13
- **effective on:** Not available
- **summary:** 14-0194 response to S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc. concerning 178.33b.
- **machine formats:** - **json:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-14-0194.json
- **markdown:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-14-0194.md
- **app url:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-14-0194
- **source url:** https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretation%20Files/2015/140194.pdf
**body:**

<<<PAGE 1>>>

of Transportation
U.S. Department
Washington DC 20590
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
MAR 1 3 2015
Mr. Chris Kubicek
S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc.
1525 Howe Street - MS 042
Racine, WI 53403
Ref. No. 14-0194
Dear Mr. Kubicek:
This responds to your October 14, 2014 email requesting clarification on the design
qualification requirements for DOT-2S containers under the Hazardous Materials
Regulations (HMR; 49 CFR Parts 171-180). You state that some manufacturers of 2S
containers interpret that the drop test must be performed on a filled container with only the
valve cup installed - reflecting the product configuration of the container during the
manufacturing process immediately after filling. Additionally, you attached photographs of
examples of the containers with the valve only configurations and with the actuator overcap
configuration. Specifically, you ask that when the container (i.e., the aerosol) is drop tested
in accordance with § 178.33b-7, should the test be conducted with the actuator overcap
removed or should the container be tested in its assembled configuration for consumer use?
The container should not be tested in its assembled configuration. The drop test must be
performed with the valve only, i.e., without any covers/overcaps attached.
I hope this answers your inquiry. If you need additional assistance, please contact this
Office at 202-366-8553.
Acting Chief, Standards Development Branch
Standards and Rulemaking Division

<<<PAGE 2>>>

Boothe
178.336-7
Desion Qualification
Dodd, Alice (PHMSA)
1-0194
From:
Sent:
Betts, Charles (PHMSA)
Tuesday, October 14, 2014 11:06 AM
To:
Dodd, Alice (PHMSA)
Cc:
Subject:
Goodall, Shante CTR (PHMSA)
Fw: Interpretation of 178.33b-7
Attachments:
consumer 1.jpg; consumer 2.jpg; consumer 3.jpg; valve only 1.jpg; valve only 2.jpg; valve
only 3.jpg
Alice-
Please log and assigned to a specialist.
Thanks,
Charles
From: Kubicek, Chris A. [mailto:CAKubice@scj.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2014 09:30 AM Eastern Standard Time
To: Betts, Charles (PHMSA)
Cc: Freeman, Cheryl (PHMSA); shane.kelly@dot.gov<shane.kelly@dot.gov>; Doug Fratz (dfratz@cspa.org)
<dfratz@cspa.org>; Steve Engler (sengler@aerofil.com) <sengler@aerofil.com>
Subject: FW: Interpretation of 178.33b-7
Charles, thank you for your clarification to Mr. Fratz on the 49CFR178.33b-7 (DOT-2S) drop test protocol. We
understand the aerosol product should be tested without it's shipping container.
We do need more clarification on the aerosol itself. Some of our CSPA members interpret the drop testing to be
performed on a filled container with only the valve cup installed (the product configuration of the aerosol during the
manufacturing process immediately after filling).
When the individual aerosol is drop tested, should that aerosol container with the actuator overcap removed? Or
should the aerosol container be tested in the assembled configuration as the consumer would be using?
• I am attaching three examples of 'valve only configurations, and 3 examples of the assembled aerosols for consumer
use.
Thank you for your help on this, we look forward to your response.
Chris
COLAS RATE
SCIENCES
CHRIS KUBICEK | Principal | ph 262.260.5419 txt 262.374.2089 | cakubice@scj.com
S. C. Johnson & Son, Inc. | 1525 Howe Street - MS 042 - Racine, WI 53403
1

<<<PAGE 3>>>

"The information herein contains the Confidential and Proprietary Information of S.C. Johnson.
Neither receipt nor possession thereof confers any right to reproduce, use, or disclose, in whole
or in part, any of this information, except in accordance with a written agreement with S.C. Johnson."
From: Doug Fratz [mailto:dfratz@cspa.org]
To: Kubicek, Chris A.
Sent: Friday, October 03, 2014 12:22 PM
Subject: Fwd: Interpretation of 178.33b-7
See response below.
D. Douglas Fratz
Senior Science Fellow and
Aerosol Division Staff Executive
Consumer Specialty Products Association
1667 K Street NW, Suite 300
Washington, DC 20006
Direct: 202-833-7304
Office: 202-872-8110
email dfratz@cspa.org | www.cspa.org
This e-mail, including any attachments, contains information from the Consumer Specialty Products Association (SPA)
and is intended solely for the use of the named recipient or recipients and CSPA member companies. This email,
including any attachments or hyperlinks within it, may contain information that is confidential, legally privileged or
otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you are not entitled to use,
disclose, distribute, copy, print, disseminate or rely on this email in any way. Even if you are the intended recipient or a
CSPA member company, you may not distribute, disclose or otherwise disseminate this email or its attachments outside
the membership of CSPA, without CSPA's prior written consent. Sent from my iPad
Begin forwarded message:
From: <charles.betts@dot.gov>
Date: October 3, 2014 at 8:37:02 AM EDT
To: <dfratz@cspa.org>
Cc: <cheryl.freeman@dot.gov>,<shane.kelley@dot.gov>
Subject: RE: Interpretation of 178.33b-7
Good morning Mr. Fratz-
After speaking with several staff members, it is our understanding that the drop test must be performed
on the filled DOT 25 container without the outer shipping container.
We hope that this helps.
Regards,
2

<<<PAGE 4>>>

Charles
From: Doug Fratz [mailto: dfratz@cspa.org]
To: Kelley, Shane (PHMSA); Betts, Charles (PHMSA)
Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2014 9:15 AM
Subject: Interpretation of 178.33b-7
Shane, Charles:
We have a question regarding the requirement in 49CFR178.33b-7 that, "The closure, or sealing
component of the container, must not be protected during the test." (This relates to the design
qualification drop test for 2S plastic aerosol containers.) Does this simply mean that the test is
conducted on the filled aerosol product without the outer shipping container (usually a
cardboard box)?
Thanks in advance.
D. Douglas Fratz
Senior Science Fellow and
Aerosol Products Division Staff Executive
1667 K Street NW, Suite 300
Consumer Specialty Products Association
Washington, DC 20006
Direct: 202-833-7304
Office: 202-872-8110
email dfratz@cspa.org | www.cspa.org
This e-mail, including any attachments, contains information from the Consumer Specialty Products Association (SPA) and is
intended solely for the use of the named recipient or recipients and CSPA member companies. This email, including any attachments or
the intended recipient of this email, you are not entitled to use, disclose, distribute, copy. print, disseminate or rely on this email in any
hyperlinks within it, may contain information that is confidential, legally privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not
email or its attachments outside the membership of CSPA, without SPA's prior written consent.
way. Even if you are the intended recipient or a SPA member company, you may not distribute, disclose or otherwise disseminate this
3

<<<PAGE 5>>>

ble
AIR

<<<PAGE 6>>>

Geringerer CO, Ausstoß währene
des Produktionsprozesses im
Vergleich zur Aluminium Dose
SANFTE PFLEGE
BESONDERS
Baleá
nature
THER
NUNi
OHNE
• blikone
Parabene
Mineralele

<<<PAGE 7>>>

glade
премин
Starte: */t
fujiape
cordai
spice
ASTAN:
ALPHE CORCHAIT
DER PRESSURE
TIL 702(198 g)

<<<PAGE 8>>>

Expresine
1165.
Instructions
,elp stop inhalation abuss
3. top 1200
www.inhalant.org•
information, visit
reguinture
Federdi
prohiba Of
in cetosols
propollan's
COMMENIS?
QUESTIONS?
*pate Helen Joterali
1 at: 600 558-5252
(32011
4303 2736 0SA
brit
it Righas Reserves?

<<<PAGE 9>>>

Bales
nature
195%
RASIER
OHNE
• Parabene
• Sikone

<<<PAGE 10>>>

AIR
PACK
- **truncated:** false
- **body characters:** 7640
