# Ingram Micro Inc. — Hazardous Materials Safety Interpretation

- **operation:** document
- **citation:** 15-0043
- **title:** Ingram Micro Inc. — Hazardous Materials Safety Interpretation
- **source type:** guidance
- **agency:** Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
- **status:** guidance
- **official:** true
- **published on:** 2015-10-20
- **effective on:** Not available
- **summary:** 15-0043 response to Ingram Micro Inc. concerning 173.185.
- **machine formats:** - **json:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-15-0043.json
- **markdown:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-15-0043.md
- **app url:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-15-0043
- **source url:** https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretation%20Files/2015/150043.pdf
**body:**

<<<PAGE 1>>>

of Transportation
U.S. Department
Washington. DC
1200 New Jersey Avenue 3E
20590
Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety
Administration
Mr. Glenn Williams
OCT 2 0 2015
Ingram Micro Inc.
1759 Wehrle Drive
Williamsville, NY 14221
Ref. No. 15-0043
Dear Mr. Williams:
This is a response to your March 4, 2015 email requesting clarification of the Hazardous
Materials Regulations (HMR; 49 CFR Parts 171-180) with regard to the transportation of
lithium batteries under § 173.185(c). Specifically, you request confirmation that electronic
manifests corresponding to your shipments are not required to be annotated with the
required language in § 173.185(c)(4)(ii), stating the package complies with that paragraph
((c)(4)), or the applicable ICAO Packing Instruction.
In accordance with § 173.185(c)(4)(ii), when an air waybill (AWB) is used, an indication on
the air waybill of compliance with paragraph (c)(4) (or the applicable ICAO Packing
Instruction) must be included. In your email and conversation with a member of my staff,
you state that you use an electronic manifest and not an AWB for shipments of lithium
batteries. This document includes information regarding the shipment, such as the number
of packages, but does not include an indication of the commodity. Additionally, you state
that the electronic manifest contains the information normally found on an AWB (i.e.,
contractual information between the shipper and carrier).
Although not defined in the HMR, we believe industry practice is for an AWB to include a
description of the nature of goods in the shipment. The freight forwarder or air carrier that
accepts your shipments are in the best position to inform you of whether an AWB (or
information contained within the AWB) is required with your shipments). If so, the AWB
annotation in § 173.185(c)(4)(ii) is required.
The required annotations (i.e., the marking on the box and the indication on AWB)
communicate to the air carrier that the package contains lithium batteries and is in
compliance with the HMR without more extensive paperwork. They are both important
hazard communications to air carriers. Air carriers cannot manage risks to their aircraft if
they cannot identify such risks. I encourage you to inquire with your freight forwarder
and/or air carrier to ensure that your shipments are offered in compliance.

<<<PAGE 2>>>

I hope this information is helpful. If you have any more questions, please do not hesitate to
contact this office.
Sincerely,
for Dirk Der Kinderen
Acting Chief, Standards Development
Standards and Rulemaking Division

<<<PAGE 3>>>

juchak
IN RAMI!
$173.185 X4(1)
upplicabilit
15-0043
Glenn K. Williams
Hazardous Materials Project Manager
Ingram Micro Inc.
1759 Wehrle Drive
Direct
Mobile
+1-585-746-7471
Williamsvile, NY 14221
+1-585-728-3232
Glenn.williams@ingrammicro.com
March 4, 2015
Mr. Charles E. Betts
Director, Standards and Rulemaking Division
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE East Building, 2nd Floor
U.S. DOT/PHMSA (PHH-10)
Washington, DC 20590
Subject: Request for Interpretation; 49 CFR 173.185(c) (4)(ii)
Dear Mr. Betts:
Please accept this letter as a request for formal interpretation and applicability of 49 CFR
173.185(c)(4)(ii).
When tendering consignments of lithium batteries to our air carriers Ingram Micro uses an
electronic manifest. We do not use an air waybill. It is our understanding since we do not use an
air waybill we are not required to annotate the electronic manifest with the required language
described in 173.185(c)(4)(ii) "the shipment is in compliance with this paragraph or the applicable
ICAO Packing instruction" when packages are required to bear lithium battery handling mark.
Ingram Micro respectfully request a formal written clarification on our understanding regarding
the requirement to annotate the electronic manifest with the language required when an air
waybill is used. Please contact me via email at glenn.williams@ingrammicro or at 585-746-7471.
Thank you in advance
Sincerely,
Glenn Wiliams
Glenn Williams
Hazardous Materials Project Manager
Ingram Micro Inc.
www.ingrammicro.com
- **truncated:** false
- **body characters:** 4105
