# VEOLIA NORTH AMERICA — Hazardous Materials Safety Interpretation

- **operation:** document
- **citation:** 15-0103
- **title:** VEOLIA NORTH AMERICA — Hazardous Materials Safety Interpretation
- **source type:** guidance
- **agency:** Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
- **status:** guidance
- **official:** true
- **published on:** 2015-09-10
- **effective on:** Not available
- **summary:** 15-0103 response to VEOLIA NORTH AMERICA concerning 171.8, 172.302, 173.24, 173.240.
- **machine formats:** - **json:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-15-0103.json
- **markdown:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-15-0103.md
- **app url:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-15-0103
- **source url:** https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretation%20Files/2015/150103.pdf
**body:**

<<<PAGE 1>>>

U.S. Department
of Transportation
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE
Washington. DC 20590
Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety
Administration
SEP 1 0 2015
Ms. Jennifer Eberle
Manager, Transportation Compliance
Industrial Business
VEOLIA NORTH AMERICA
1 Eden Lane
Flanders, NJ 07836
Ref. No. 15-0103
Dear Ms. Eberle:
This responds to your letter dated October 31, 2014 requesting clarification of the Hazardous
Materials Regulations (HMR; 49 CFR Parts 171-180) applicable to the use of sift-proof,
closed bulk bins. In your letter, you describe a shipment of "Hazardous waste, solid, n.o.s.," a
Class 9, Packing Group III material, in a non-bulk quantity with an identification of
"NA3077" in a device that exceeds the physical dimensions of a non-bulk packaging. Your
questions are paraphrased and answered as follows:
• Q1. Is it permissible to transport this material in the device without any further outside
packaging as a sift-proof, closed bulk bin under the provisions of § 173.240(c)?
Al.
The answer is yes, provided the device is consistent with the provisions of the HMR
for a non-Department of Transportation (DOT) specification, sift-proof, closed bulk
bin. Under § 171.8, "siftproof packaging" is a "packaging impermeable to dry
contents, including fine solid material produced during transportation." The HMR
provides no definition for closed bulk bins, but it is the opinion of this Office that a
"closed bulk bin" can be described as an "enclosed packaging that is tough, firm, and
durable (i.e., strong), constructed so that its contents cannot pass through (i.e.,
completely enclosed), and which meets other applicable requirements of
§ 173.24." Please be aware that it is your responsibility to ensure that the packaging is
"designed, constructed, maintained, filled, its contents so limited, and closed, so that
under conditions normally incident to transportation" there will be no identifiable
release of hazardous material per the requirements of § 173.24(b).
A2.
Is the device required to comply with the marking requirements for a non-bulk or a
bulk packaging under Subpart D-Marking?
Q2.
The packaging is required to be marked in conformance with the marking
requirements for a bulk packaging under § 172.302. As you have described the

<<<PAGE 2>>>

this shipment must comply with the marking requirements for bulk packagings per §
amount.
172.302, regardless of whether the quantity of material transported is of a non-bulk
I hope this answers your inquiry. If you need additional assistance, please contact this Office
again:
Sincerely
Acting Chief, Standards Development Branch
Standards and Rulemaking Division

<<<PAGE 3>>>

Resto
•
171.8.173.213,173.24
Goodall, Shante CTR (PHMSA)
173.240(c)
From:
Rivera, Jordan CTR (PHMSA)
definitions
Sent:
Wednesday, May 27, 2015 3:45 PM
15-0103
To:
azmat Interp
Subject:
N: Request for Written Interpretati
Attachments:
Authorized Bulk Packaging Substituted for Non-Bulk Packages - Interp Request
(VES).pdf
Shante/Alice,
Please submit this for a formal letter of interpretation. It looks like it was never entered into the interps database.
Thanks,
Jordan
From: Ciccarone, Michael CTR (PHMSA)
To: Hazmat Interps
Sent: Friday, October 31, 2014 2:29 PM
Subject: FW: Request for Written Interpretation
Shante/Alice,
Please submit this for a formal letter of interpretation. Ms. Eberle spoke with Jordan Rivera in the HMIC.
Thanks,
Mike
From: Eberle, Jennifer [mailto:jennifer.eberle@veolia.com]
sent: Friday, October 31, 2014 1:53 PM
To: PHMSA HM InfoCenter
Subject: Request for Written Interpretation
Jennifer Eberle
Manager, Transportation Compliance
Industrial Business
VEOLIA NORTH AMERICA
tel
+1 973 691 7331
/ cell

<<<PAGE 4>>>

+1 862 432 9778
1 Eden Lane, Flanders NJ 07836
jennifer.eberle@veolia.com
www.veolianorthamerica.com

<<<PAGE 5>>>

•
@VEOLIA
October 31, 2014
USDOT
Attn: PHH-10
PHMSA Office of Hazardous Materials Standards
East Building
Washington DC 20590-0001
1200 New Jersey Avenue S.E.
RE: Request for Interpretation Regarding the Use of Sift-Proof Closed Bulk Bins for Packagings
Meeting the Definition But Exceeding the Physical Dimensions of a Non-Bulk Packaging
To Whom It May Concern:
Please accept this letter as a request for a formal written interpretation from your office. Recently, Veolia
against the use of a non-specification bulk packaging authorization when the capacity of the package is
obtained guidance from a PHMSA Hazmat Regulatory Specialist who clarified that there is no restriction
defined as non-bulk.
following:
Based on this recent guidance, Veolia is requesting a written interpretation from PHMSA to clarify the
1) Example: A device containing a Class 9 hazardous waste solid material meets the definition of non-
bulk under §171.8 however, the outside dimensions of the device are too large to be packaged in any
container meeting the general packaging requirements in §173.24, is it permissible to be shipped
non-bulk packaging currently authorized under §173.213. Since the device itself is a sift-proof
$173.240(c)?
without any further outside packaging as a sift-proof closed bulk bin under the provisions of
2) If the answer to question 1 is "yes" is the device required to meet the marking requirements for a
non-bulk or bulk packaging under Subpart D-Marking?
this request please feel free to contact me at jennifer.eberle@veolia.com / 973-691-7331 or Tom Baker at
Your written response to this request is greatly appreciated. If you require any further information regarding
tom.baker@veolia.com / 973-691-7330.
Thank you,
Jexsefer Eberle
Jennifer Eberle
Industrial Business
Manager, Transportation Compliance
VEOLIA NORTH AMERICA
1 Eden Lane
Veolia North America
tel 973-691-7331 fax 973-691-3978
Flanders, NJ 07836
www.veolianorthamerica.com
- **truncated:** false
- **body characters:** 5783
