# Mr. Edwin Van Schoick — Hazardous Materials Safety Interpretation

- **operation:** document
- **citation:** 15-0136
- **title:** Mr. Edwin Van Schoick — Hazardous Materials Safety Interpretation
- **source type:** guidance
- **agency:** Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
- **status:** guidance
- **official:** true
- **published on:** 2016-03-29
- **effective on:** Not available
- **summary:** 15-0136 concerning 177.848.
- **machine formats:** - **json:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-15-0136.json
- **markdown:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-15-0136.md
- **app url:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-15-0136
- **source url:** https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretation%20Files/2016/150136.pdf
**body:**

<<<PAGE 1>>>

of Transportation
U.S. Department
Washington, D.C. 20590
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
Pipeline and Hazardous
Administration
Materials Safety
MAR 2 9 2016
Mr. Edwin Van Schoick
18213 Bittern Avenue
Lutz, FL 33558
Reference No. 15-0136
Dear Mr. Van Schoick:
This is in response to your recent letter requesting clarification of the Hazardous Materials
Regulations (HMR; 49 CFR Parts 171-180) applicable to transporting five Division 2.3
(poisonous) gases and one Division 2.2 (non-flammable) gas, all with subsidiary hazards. We
have listed the gases you described in the table below. Specifically, you ask if these gases are
segregated in the manner prescribed in § 177.848(e)(6) may they be transported on the same
vehicle. We have paraphrased your questions and answered them in the order you provided.
No.
ID No.
Hazardous Material
Primary
Hazard
Subsidiary
| Hazard
Hazard
Zone
2
UN 2188
3
UN 2199
Arsine
2.3
2.1
2.3
2.1
A
UN 1953
Phosphine
4
5
UN 2418
Sulfur tetrafluoride
Compressed gas, toxic, flammable, n.o.s.
2.3
2.3
2.1
C
8
UN 2190
2.3
2.2
5.1, 8
A
UN 1070
Oxygen difluoride, compressed
5.1
A
Nitrous oxide
None
Q1.
Do my Division 2.3 hazardous materials that have a Class 8 (corrosive) subsidiary
hazard need to be segregated from other Division 2.3 hazardous materials when the
Class 8 material is not in a liquid state since the segregation table in § 177.848
requires that Division 2.3 materials must be segregated from "8 liquids only"?
Al. The answer is no. Division 2.3 hazardous materials with a Class 8 subsidiary hazard
are not subject to the segregation requirements prescribed in § 177.848 for
transportation in commerce by motor vehicle when no corrosive liquid is present. In
addition, § 177.848(e)(6) waives the segregation requirements for subsidiary
"secondary" hazards in hazardous materials with the same primary hazard class
provided these materials will not react dangerously with each other.
Q2.
By segregating in a motor vehicle the materials meeting the Division 2.1 (flammable
gas) subsidiary hazard class from the materials meeting the Division 5.1 (oxidizer)
subsidiary hazard class, in my opinion a dangerous reaction between them would be
eliminated by virtue of the fact that if there were simultaneous leaking containers of

<<<PAGE 2>>>

these materials, both gases would be sufficiently diluted in concentration by the air
in the transport vehicle. The hazard of a dangerous reaction is posed by the air in the
transport vehicle in the event of a leaking Division 2.1 subsidiary hazard
material. Can these materials be transported on the same transport vehicle if
properly segregated?
A2.
The segregation requirements in § 177.848(d) and (e) permit Division 2.1 materials
to be placed in the same motor vehicle with Division 5.1 materials, but prohibit
Division 2.3, Zone A, materials from being placed in the same motor vehicle with
Division S.1 materials. However, § 177.848(e)(6) provides segregation reliet by
permitting materials with the same primary hazard regardless of their subsidiary
hazards to be placed on the same motor vehicle provided they are not capable of
reacting dangerously with each other and causing combustion or dangerous
evolution of heat, evolution of flammable, poisonous, or asphyxiant gases, or
formation of corrosive or unstable materials.
I hope this satisfies your request.
Sincerely,
Taken Faster
T. Glenn Foster
Chief, Regulatory Review and Reinvention Branch
Standards and Rulemaking Division
2

<<<PAGE 3>>>

Edmonson
§177.848(eXt)
segregation
15-0136
U.S. DOT
June 24, 2015
PHMSA: Office of Hazardous Materials Standards
Attn: PHH-10.
East Building
1200 New Jersey Ave., SE.
Washington, DC 20590-0001
Request for interpretation of 49CFR177.848(e)(6):
Can the following hazardous materials be transported on the same transport vehicle:
Hazardous
ID No.
Primary
Zone
Subsidiary
Material
Hazard
Hazard
Arsine
UN2188
A
2.1
Phosphine
UN2199
2.3
A
2.1
Compressed gas,
UN1953
2.3
2.1
toxic, flammable,
n.o.s., IHZ C
Sulfur tetrafluoride
UN2418
2.3
A
8
Oxygen difluoride,
UN2190
2.3
A
5:1/8
Compressed
Nitrous oxide
UN1070
2.2
none
5.1
Since all of the above materials are gases in hazard class 2, then if they meet the standard in
49CFR177.848(e)(6) they would be able to be transported on the same transport vehicle.
Questions:
1. Given that neither of the materials with a subsidiary hazard of class 8 are liquids, is it
necessary that they be segregated?
2. By segregating the materials with the division 2.1 subsidiary hazard from the materials
with the division 5.1 subsidiary hazard a dangerous reaction between them is eliminated
by virtue of the fact that if there were simultaneous leaking containers of these
materials, both of them would be diluted in concentration by the air in the transport
vehicle. The hazard of a dangerous reaction is posed by the air in the transport vehicle in
the event of a leaking division 2.1 subsidiary hazard material.
Can these materials be transported on the same transport vehicle if properly
segregated?
Thank you for your guidance in this matter.
Edwin Van Schoick
18213 Bittern Ave.:
Lutz, FL. 33558
(713)817-8033 daytime phone no.
- **truncated:** false
- **body characters:** 5166
