# Daniel Training Services — Hazardous Materials Safety Interpretation

- **operation:** document
- **citation:** 16-0026
- **title:** Daniel Training Services — Hazardous Materials Safety Interpretation
- **source type:** guidance
- **agency:** Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
- **status:** guidance
- **official:** true
- **published on:** 2016-07-21
- **effective on:** Not available
- **summary:** 16-0026 response to Daniel Training Services concerning 172.334.
- **machine formats:** - **json:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-16-0026.json
- **markdown:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-16-0026.md
- **app url:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-16-0026
- **source url:** https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretation%20Files/2016/160026.pdf
**body:**

<<<PAGE 1>>>

U.S. Department
of Transportation
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
Washington, D.C. 20590
Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety
Administration
JUL 2 1 2016
Mr. Daniel Stoehr
Daniels Training Services
P.O. Box 1232
Freeport, IL 61032
Ref. No.: 16-0026
Dear Mr. Stoehr:
This responds to your February 17, 2016 letter requesting clarification of the Hazardous
Materials Regulations (HMR; 49 CFR Parts 171-180) applicable to the display of identification
numbers on placards on a closed transport vehicle that contains materials with different
identification numbers. Specifically you seek clarification on § 172.334(d) that states a placard
bearing an identification number may not be used to satisfy the placarding requirements under
Subpart F of Part 172 unless it is the correct identification number for all hazardous materials of
the same class in the transport vehicle or freight container on which it is displayed.
You also enclosed two illustrations that show a transport vehicle displaying two placards each
displaying different identification numbers. In the first illustration the transport vehicle displays
two Class 8 Corrosive placards with different identification numbers. The second illustration
shows a transport vehicle displaying two Class 3 Flammable liquid placards with two different
identification numbers. Your questions are paraphrased and answered below:
Q1. As provided in § 172.334(d) can the identification number be displayed on a placard only if
the identification number represents all of the hazardous material in the transport vehicle or
freight container?
A1. If an identification number is displayed on a placard that identification number must
represent all of the hazardous material of the same class on the transport vehicle or freight
container. An identification number may be displayed on a placard even if a transport vehicle or
freight container contains multiple hazardous materials. However, the transport vehicle or
freight container must display additional placards as required, communicating the hazards of the
other material in the transport vehicle or freight container.
Q2. It is your understanding that the intent of § 172.334(d) is to prohibit the display of an
identification number on a placard when the hazardous material corresponding to the
identification number does not meet the definition of the hazard class on the placard.

<<<PAGE 2>>>

A2. Your understanding is not entirely correct. It is correct that any placard used for display of
the identification number must correspond to the hazard class of the material. However, this
requirement is outlined in § 172.334(b).
Q3. Is the display of the identification numbers on the placards in the two illustrations compliant
with § 172.334(d)?
A3. The display of the identification numbers on separate placards complies with § 172.334(d)
if the identification numbers displayed on the freight container or transport vehicle represent all
of the hazardous materials in the transport vehicle or freight container.
I hope this answers your inquiry. If you need additional assistance, please contact the Standards
and Rulemaking Division at (202) 366-8553.
Sincerely,
Duane A. Pfund
International Standards Coordinator
Standards and Rulemaking Division

<<<PAGE 3>>>

811L.
hearsald)
Placarding
Dodd, Alice (PHMSA)
16-0026
From:
Geller, Shelby CTR (PHMSA)
Sent:
Wednesday, February 17, 2016 10:05 AM
To:
Hazmat Interps
Subject:
FW: Request for Letter of Interpretation of 49 CFR 172.334(d)
Attachments:
Request for LOI - ID # on Placards.pdf
Dear Shante and Alice,
Forwarded is a request for a letter of interpretation. Mr. Stoehr spoke with Jonathon on his question.
Thanks,
Shelby
From: Daniel Stoehr [mailto:info@danielstraining.com]
To: INFOCNTR (PHMSA)
Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2016 7:38 PM
Subject: Request for Letter of Interpretation of 49 CFR 172.334(d)
Please see attached for a request for a letter of interpretation of a particular regulation of the HMR.
Please don't hesitate to contact me with any questions.
Daniel Stoehr
Daniels Training Services
815.821.1550
www.DanielsTraining.com

<<<PAGE 4>>>

Daniels Training Services
A different kind of training
DANIELS
TRAINING SERVICES
February 17, 2016
U.S Department of Transportation
PHMSA Office of Hazardous Materials Standards
Attn:PHH-10
East Building
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
Washington, DC 20590-0001
RE:
Display of More than one Identification Number on Placards of the Same Hazard
Class on a Transport Vehicle or Freight Container
After review of the Hazardous Material Regulations and discussion with the staff of the
Hazardous Materials Information Center I submit this request for a letter of interpretation to
clarify a specific regulation of the HMR. The regulation in question is 49 CFR 172.334
Identification numbers; prohibited display; specifically, paragraph (d) which as of the date of
this letter reads:
"Except as provided in $172.336, a placard bearing an identification number may not be used
to meet the requirements of subpart F of this part unless it is the correct identification number
for all hazardous materials of the same class in the transport vehicle or freight container on
which it is displayed."
Read literally, "...for all hazardous materials..." could be interpreted to mean that the
identification number may only be displayed on a placard if the identification number represents
all of the hazardous materials within the transport vehicle or freight container. This would mean
that a transport vehicle or freight container with two HazMat of the same hazard class with
different identification numbers could not display those identification numbers on two placards
of the same hazard class. I don't believe this is the intent of the regulation.
I believe the intent of §172.334(d) is to prohibit the display of an identification number on a
placard when the hazardous material with that identification number does not meet the definition
of the hazard class of the placard displayed.
Question 1: Is my literal interpretation of $172.334(d) correct?
Question 2: Is my interpretation of the intent of §172.334(d) correct?
Question 3: Is the display of the identification number and placard combination in either of the
following two images a violation of 49 CFR 172.334(d)?
PO Box 1232
Info@DanielsTraining.com
Freeport, IL 61032
815.821.1550
www.DanielsTraining.com

<<<PAGE 5>>>

Image 1 - Two Class 8 Corrosive placards on a transport vehicle each displaying a
different identification number (3265 & 2922):
3265
2922)
eat Uare
8
Image 2 - Two Class 3 Flammable Liquid placards on a transport vehicle each displaying a
different identification number (1210 & 1866):
1210
1866
Thank you for your time and I look forward to your response.
Sincerely,
Daniel Stoehr
Daniels Training Services
815.821.1550
nfo@DanielsTraining.co
ww.DanielsTraining.co
- **truncated:** false
- **body characters:** 6869
