# Truck Trailer Manufactures Association (TTMA) — Hazardous Materials Safety Interpretation

- **operation:** document
- **citation:** 16-0082
- **title:** Truck Trailer Manufactures Association (TTMA) — Hazardous Materials Safety Interpretation
- **source type:** guidance
- **agency:** Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
- **status:** guidance
- **official:** true
- **published on:** 2017-05-31
- **effective on:** Not available
- **summary:** 16-0082 response to Truck Trailer Manufactures Association (TTMA) concerning 178.345.
- **machine formats:** - **json:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-16-0082.json
- **markdown:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-16-0082.md
- **app url:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-16-0082
- **source url:** https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretation%20Files/2017/160082.pdf
**body:**

<<<PAGE 1>>>

Engineering Manager
Truck Trailer Manufacturers Association (TTMA)
7001 Heritage Village Plaza, Suite 220
Gainesville, VA 20155
Reference No. 16-0082
Dear Mr. Freiler:
This letter is in response to your May 11, 2016, email requesting clarification of the Hazardous
Materials Regulations (HMR; 49 CFR Parts 171-180) applicable to the accident damage
protection requirements for certain specification DOT cargo tank motor vehicles (CTMVs) found
in § 178.345-8. Specifically, you ask about the requirement for protecting piping, or any device,
that if damaged in an accident could result in loss of lading.
We have paraphrased and answered your questions as follows:
Q1.
You seek confirmation of your understanding that the requirement to provide protection
of 'piping, or any device, that if damaged in an accident could result in the loss of lading'
in § 178.345-8(a)(2) extends to components such as the dust cap, which do not carry
lading during transit but could transfer significant forces to areas that do contain lading.
Al. Your understanding is correct.
Q2. You seek confirmation of your understanding that the 6-inch horizontal set-back design,
required as part of the rear-end protection provision in § 178.345-8(d)(1), also applies to
the dust cap, arms, and hand valves even if these elements do not normally carry lading
during transit.
A2.
Your understanding is correct. The dust cover and hand valve must be included in the 6-
inch horizontal set-back design as they are part of the piping system. However, if the
piping includes a stop valve and a sacrificial device such as a shear section, then the
piping is considered protected.
Q3.
You ask whether the requirement in § 178.345-8(a)(2) concerning protection against loss
of lading as mentioned in Q1 applies to other cargo tank piping that is attached but not
associated with an outlet valve. You also ask whether § 178.345-8(a)(2) applies to air or
vapor lines installed according to good industry practice (e.g., TTMA RP 102).

<<<PAGE 2>>>

§ 178.345-8(d)(1) do not apply to piping that if damaged in an accident could result in a
loss of lading from the cargo tank but is not required by the applicable specification.
I hope this information is helpful. Please contact us if we can be of further assistance.
Sincerely,
Chief, Standards Development
Standards and Rulemaking Division

<<<PAGE 3>>>

Please enter this letter of interpretation request, and assign it to Matt Nickels.
Thanks,
M
From: John Freiler [mailto:john@ttmanet.org]
Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2016 10:42 AM
To: Nickels, Matthew (PHMSA)
Cc: Carrie Renuart; Jeff Sims; Nancy Livingston
Subject: Re: Request for interpretation re: piping setback.
Hi Matt,
See the attached letter and RP. It should address your concerns; if not, let me know.
Thanks!
John Freiler - Engineering Manager
Truck Trailer Manufacturers Association
7001 Heritage Village Plaza
Suite 220
Gainesville, VA 20155-3094
703-549-3010 - Phone

<<<PAGE 4>>>

PHMSA-Office of Hazardous Materials Standards
Attn: PHH-10
East Building
1200 New Jersey Ave, SE
Washington, DC 20590
Phmsa.hm-infocenter@dot.gov
Subject: Request for Interpretation
Dear Sirs;
The Truck Trailer Manufacturers Association (TTMA) is an international trade association representing approximately
90% of the trailers manufactured in the United States. This request for interpretation concerns §178.345-8 Accident
Damage Protection and the interactions between paragraphs (a)(2) and (d) of that section.
It has come to TTMA's attention that the agency is considering that the requirement for protecting "piping, or any
device that if damaged in an accident could result in loss of lading" in §178.345-8(a)(2) includes the dust cap and its
arms when evaluating the 6" horizontal set-back rule in $178.345-8(d)(1) even if such are not normally carrying
lading. The rationale is that the dust cap and other components are substantial and could transfer significant forces
through to areas that do contain lading in transit. See the following photo:
Our concern is if PHMSA views the hand valve and dust
cap to be an extension of the piping. which, despite not
containing lading during transit, could damage the lading
containing portions of the cargo tank; such thinking could
be used expansively for other cargo tank piping not
associated with the bottom outlet valve shown in the
picture.
Compressed air and vapor lines are often run to the top of
the cargo tank to provide ground level access points for
operators as a safer alternative to ascending the ladder of
the cargo tank with hoses to either inject air or remove
vapors. A common industry practice is shown in the
accompanying illustration:

<<<PAGE 5>>>

-SIDE OF LANK HE RUM
LAFOR LEE TO RUNN
TO FEAR DF THALER
THA RP NO. 102, FIGURE TWO
As can be seen in the drawing, the piping involved does not pose a risk of tank puncture in a rear end collision: it is
both too long and narrow to transfer significant accident damage loads into the shell of the tank, and it is protected by a
sacrificial segment as it enters the overturn protection.
We would like you to clarify that the "piping or any devices that if damaged in an accident could result in a loss of
lading" referred to in §178.345-8(a)(2) does not include air or vapor lines installed according to good industry practice
such as that described in TTMA RP 102. (copy attached) Further, that the 6" set-back provisions contained in
§178.345-8(d)(1) also do not apply to these air or vapor lines.
not hesitate to contact the undersigned.
Thank you for considering our request for interpretation. If you have any questions concerning this letter, please do
Sincerely,
John Freiler
Engineering Manager
Enc.

<<<PAGE 6>>>

www.ttmanet.org
Title: Vapor Recovery Line Configurations for DOT 407 and DOT 412 Cargo Tanks
Previous Editions:
Originally Issued April 2002; Reissued May 2008, April 2013.
1.0
Preface:
1.1
No part of this document may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or
written permission from the Truck Trailer Manufacturers Association.
nechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage or retrieval system withou
1.2
Recommended Practices and Technical Bulletins are furnished by the TTMA as a guide to general practices in
the manufacture, use, and repair of truck trailers. However, the scope of the TTMA's Recommended Practices
and Technical Bulletins is not exhaustive of all general practices in the manufacture, use, and repair of truck
trailers and there may exist such general practices which do not appear in either the Recommended Practices or
Technical Bulletins.
1.3
Recommended Practices and Technical Bulletins represent the state-of-the-art that existed at the time of its
preparation. Users of Recommended Practices and Technical Bulletins should familiarize themselves with
advancements in practices that have occurred subsequent to the Recommended Practice's or Technical
Bulletin's publication date.
1.4
The TTMA has not undertaken any evaluation of all the conceivable ways in which Recommended Practices
or Technical Bulletins may be used by manufacturers, users, or repairers of truck trailers nor the consequences
of such uses. Everyone who uses Recommended Practices or Technical Bulletins must first satisfy himself or
herself that his or her safety, the safety of others, or the safety of the truck trailer and any other equipment will
not be jeopardized by their use of information contained within the Recommended Practices or Technical
1.5
The Recommended Practices and Technical Bulletins may contain terms or words with specialized meanings.
Nomenclature or TTMA RP No. 66 - Trailer Nomenclature.
Definitions for such terms or words may be found in TTMA RP No. 36 - Tank Trailer and Tank Container
1.6
Within the Recommended Practices and Technical Bulletins, "shall" is used wherever conformance with the
TTMA publication requires that there be no deviation from the specific recommendation. "Should" is used
publication.
wherever deviation from the specific recommendation is permissible in complying with the TTMA
Conformity with TTMA publications by manufacturers, users and repairers of truck trailers is voluntary and
any non-conformity with such publications is not indicative of the non-conforming practice being deficient.
Any inclusion of Recommended Practices or Technical Bulletins within any contract, document or standard is
voluntary, and any such inclusion shall not imply any endorsement or approval by the TTMA due to the
multitude of ways in which the Recommended Practices or Technical Bulletins may conceivably be used.

<<<PAGE 7>>>

standardization controls equipment cost by precluding the development of several unique
devices and line designs, and preventing the need for each carrier to create line
specifications.
2.3
The configurations established may not work for all applications. Therefore, the personnel
employed by companies using these configurations must determine if a tank trailer's vapor
recovery line meets essential criteria for the loading/unloading of particular products at
specific sites.
2.4
This RP is not intended to address the retrofit of vapor recovery systems on existing cargo
tanks. Such an activity requires the involvement of a design certifying engineer to satisfy
the requirements of 49 CFR 180.413.
2.5
Similarly, this RP is not intended to cover the proper methodology for cleaning vapor
recovery lines. Such methodology is the responsibility of the cleaning facility and the
operators of the cargo tank.
3.0
Background
Increasingly, the recovery of potentially harmful vapors associated with certain hazardous materials
has become mandated by Federal, state and local governments, and by shippers. Accordingly, DOT
407 and DOT 412 cargo tanks are commonly specified with a line to recover vapors during loading
and unloading.
4.0
Tee Style Hydraulically Actuated Vapor Recovery Valve (hereinafter, VR-valve)
4.1
Dimensions
4.1.1
The over-all height of the VR-valve when closed shall not exceed eight and one-half
(8.5) inches. Where possible, the CTMV manufacturer should provide adequate top
accident damage protection clearance to facilitate the use of a VR-valve with a
height of 8.5 inches even if the original equipment VR-valve has a lesser height.
4.1.2
The over-all width of the VR-valve, measured from outlet to outlet, shall be seven
(7) inches.
4.1.3
The measurement from the tank seal face to the centerline of the VR-valve outlets
shall be three and three-sixteenths (3.1875) inches.

<<<PAGE 8>>>

attact pressure of the cargo
tank's self-closing stop-valve is at least 50 psi greater than the VR-valve fitted on the
cargo tank.
4.2.3
In some cases, operating personnel may need to open the VR-valve without opening
the cargo tank's self-closing stop-valve: One such case is the application of pressure
to the tank through the VR-valve after the tank is loaded. The plumbing schematic
in Figure Five illustrates how to accomplish this isolated valve opening. By using a
manual control valve with an internal check valve in the hydraulic line to the self-
closing stop-valve, the VR-valve can be isolated. The internal check valve allows
free flow back to the pump or remote control device in case the control valve is
inadvertently closed after opening the self-closing stop-valve. The check valve
feature must be present to satisfy the requirements of 49 CFR 178.345-11(b)(1).
4.3
Positive indication of opening
4.3.1
The VR-valve shall have a visual means to provide positive indication of its
actuation. If the indication cannot reasonably be made visible, another means of
positive indication should be provided. This other means of indication may be
audible or electronic.
4.3.2 The VR-valve shall be designed and manufactured to preclude the possibility of a
false indication of opening.
4.4
Flow
4.4.1
The VR-valve shall be marked with its minimum through area in square inches when
fully open.
4.4.2 When loading or unloading, the pressure drop through the vapor recovery system
includes losses at the VR-valve, the piping on the cargo tank and any hoses, piping
and valves at the shipper's or consignee's facility. The absolute pressure in both
tanks and the piping further affects these losses. All of these losses (if known)
should be accounted for by the design certifying engineer when establishing the
maximum allowable loading and unloading rates for the cargo tank.

<<<PAGE 9>>>

4./
Vutlet Ports
4.7.1
The outlet ports of the VR-valve shall be 2" male NPT connections.
4.8
Isolation of Hydraulics
4.8.1
The hydraulics of the VR-valve shall be isolated from any space that may come in
contact with products transported in the cargo tank.
5.0
Top Configuration
5.1
Pressure Gauge
5.1.1
A pressure gauge shall be provided in the spilldam to allow operators to read tank
pressure.
5.1.2 Another gauge to read line pressure may be provided if specified by the end user.
Because of the limited volume of air contained within the top vapor recovery line,
this gauge is not mandatory.
5.2 Placement of VR-valve
5.2.1 The VR-valve shall be located as close as practicable to the transverse and
longitudinal centerline of the spilldam.
5.2.2 When possible, the top unload outlet port of the VR-valve should be located above
the respective spilldam side to facilitate ease of connecting the plant vapor line.
5.2.3 If a ladder is attached adjacent to the spilldam, the VR-valve should be placed in a
location on the longitudinal axis of the tank to allow an operator to connect the plant
vapor line while supported on the top platform of the ladder.
5.3 Top Vapor Recovery Line
5.3.1 The top vapor recovery line shall extend off the ladder side of the VR-valve and
consist of a 2" ball valve followed by a 2" camlock adapter and dust cap.
5.3.2 This line shall be braced by a support attached to the respective spilldam side (and
not the spilldam floor).

<<<PAGE 10>>>

ana consist of a 2 union and 2" (minimum) inside diameter piping over the spilldam
side to the outlet area of the cargo tank.
6.1.2
Inside the spilldam area a vertical sacrificial device shall be provided. This device
must break under strain at no more than 70% of the strength of the weakest piping
element between the VR-valve and the sacrificial device.
6.1.3
This line shall be braced by a support attached to the respective spilldam side (and
not the spilldam floor) located inside of the sacrificial device specified in 6.1.2.
6.1.4 A minimum slope shall be provided in the entire bottom vapor recovery line to
assure complete drainage of any liquid.
6.1.5
Near the outlet of the cargo tank the following devices and fittings shall be provided:
6.1.5.1
A gauge to read line pressure,
6.1.5.2
A 2" ball valve, and
6.1.5.3
A 2" camlock adapter and dust cap.
6.2
References
6.2.1 For visual representation of the bottom configuration, see Figures Two and Three in
the Appendix.
7.0
Multi-Compartment Cargo Tanks
Multi-compartment cargo tanks manufactured to the DOT 407 or DOT 412 specifications may haul
dissimilar products in different compartments. Therefore, to preclude contamination the vapor
recovery lines on multi-compartment tanks should not be manifolded.
8.0
Appendix
8.1
Figure One: Top of Tank
8.2
Figure Two: Bottom of Straight Round Tank
8.3
Figure Three: Bottom of Double Conical Tank
8.4
Figure Four: VR-Valve Standard Dimensions
8.5
Figure Five: Optional Hydraulic Plumbing Schematic

<<<PAGE 11>>>

REF. 2"
BALL VAL
VAPOI
TANK TO
DETAIL "A"
TTMA RP NO. 102,
LOCATION
OF GAUGE
REF. 2" CAM STYLE
ADAPTER AND DUST CAP
SEE DETAIL "A"
VACUUM
BREAKER
PRESSURE
RELIEF VENT

<<<PAGE 12>>>

REF. 2" CAM
STYLE ADAPTER
AND DUST CAP
REF. 2" BALL VALVE
REF. GAUGE
TIMA RP NO. 102, FIC
VAPOR LINE TO RUN DOWN
- SIDE OF TANK THEN RUN
TO REAR OF TRAILER

<<<PAGE 13>>>

TIMA RP NO. 102, FIG
HYDRAULIC
HAND PUMP
VAPOR LINE TO RUN
DOWN SIDE TO BOTTOM
CENTERLINE OF TANK THEN
FORWARD TO OUTLET AREA

<<<PAGE 14>>>

8 1/2" MAX VALVE HEIGHT
TTMA RP ND. 102,
3.1875'
-TANK NIPPLE
3 1/2°
7°
VALVE ENVELOPE —
2' NPT
3* NPT SWIVEL CONNECTION

<<<PAGE 15>>>

TIMA RP NO. 102,
HYDRAULICALLY OPERATEL
SELF-CLOSING STOP-VALI
FUSIBLE/FRANGIBLE
REMOTÉ CONTROL
DEVICE
TEE STYLE HYDRAULICALLY ACTUATED
VAPOR RECOVERY VALVE
MANUAL SELECTOR
VALVE WITH INTERNAL
CHECK VALVE
WARNING!
CHECK VALVE MUST BE INSTALLED SO THAT HYDRAULIC
PRESSURE CAN BE RELIEVED FROM SELF-CLOSING STOP
VALVE BY ACTUATION OF FUSIBLE/ FRANGIBLE EMERGENCY
REMOTE CONTROL DEVICE, EVEN IF MANUAL SELECTOR
VALVE IS CLOSED.
HYDRAULIC
PUMP &
RESERVOIR
- **truncated:** false
- **body characters:** 16567
