# Joseph Tsiyoni — Hazardous Materials Safety Interpretation

- **operation:** document
- **citation:** 19-0054
- **title:** Joseph Tsiyoni — Hazardous Materials Safety Interpretation
- **source type:** guidance
- **agency:** Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
- **status:** guidance
- **official:** true
- **published on:** 2019-09-20
- **effective on:** Not available
- **summary:** 19-0054 concerning 175.10.
- **machine formats:** - **json:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-19-0054.json
- **markdown:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-19-0054.md
- **app url:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-19-0054
- **source url:** https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/docs/standards-rulemaking/hazmat/interpretations/72466/190054.pdf
**body:**

<<<PAGE 1>>>

U.S. Department
of Transportation
Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety
Administration
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
Washington, DC 20590
SEP 2 0 2019
Joseph Tsiyoni
1415 N. Rose Street
Tempe, AZ 85281
Reference No. 19-0054
Dear Mr. Tsiyoni:
This letter is in response to your April 19, 2019, letter and subsequent phone conversations
requesting clarification of the Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR; 49 CFR Parts 171-180)
applicable to the transportation of battery-powered mobility aid equipment. Specifically, you ask
for clarification of requirements in § 175.10 for battery-powered mobility aid equipment.
We have paraphrased and answered your questions as follows:
Q 1. You ask whether lithium batteries may be used to operate a scooter "on the ground" that
have not been tested according to Part III, Sub-section 38.3 of the UN Manual of Tests
and Criteria.
Al. The HMR do not govern the personal (non-commercial) use of lithium batteries.
However, batteries that have not been tested in accordance with the UN Manual of Tests
and Criteria are generally not acceptable for transportation in commerce in the United
States. Therefore, it is unlikely that a person will have access to a lithium battery that has
not been appropriately tested due to transport restrictions.
Q2. You state that the requirements in § 175.1 0(a)(l 5)(v)(B) to fully enclose batteries in a
rigid housing is impracticable for "scooters" as the batteries must be available for
removal by the user and ask whether these requireµients apply to a wheelchair or other
mobility aid equipped with a lithium ion battery carried as carry-on baggage.
A2. The requirements in § 175.1 0(a)(l 5)(v)(B) are for wheelchairs or other battery-powered
mobility aids equipped with nonspillable batteries. The requirements for wheelchairs or
other battery-powered mobility aids equipped with lithium ion batteries are prescribed in
§ 175.1 0(a)(l 7). Section 175.1 0(a)(l 7)(ii)(A-D), (iii) and (iv) prescribe the requirements
for a lithium ion battery-powered mobility aid designed with a nonremovable battery and

<<<PAGE 2>>>

Q3. A3. § 175.1 0(a)(l 7)(v)(A-E) prescribe the requirements for a lithium ion battery-powered
mobility aid specifically designed to allow its battery to be removed ( e.g., collapsible).
You ask for an increase in the "size" limit for a lithium ion battery that powers a
wheelchair or other mobility aid that is specifically designed to allow the battery to be
removed by the user when carried in checked or carry-on baggage.
Under current HMR, lithium ion batteries designed to be removed from mobility aids
may not exceed 300 watt-hours (Wh); a maximum of one spare lithium ion battery not
exceeding 300 Wh or two spares each not exceeding 160 Wh each may be carried in
carry-on baggage only (see§ 175.10(a)(l 7)(v)). You may petition PHMSA for
rulemaking to obtain the requested relief from the § 175.1 0(a)(l 7)(v) requirements. An
applicant may request PHMSA add, amend, or delete a regulation in the HMR by
submitting a petition for rulemaking (See 49 CPR § 106.95- 106.130). You may obtain
information on the petition for rulemaking application process by contacting PHMSA's
Standards and Rulemaking Division at (202) 366-8553. For additional information
regarding the transportation of mobility aids aboard aircraft, please visit the FAA Pack
Safe Web site (see http://www.faa.gov/Go/PackSafe).
I hope this information is helpful. Please contact us if we can be of further assistance.
Sincerely,

<<<PAGE 3>>>

=============~============JOSEPHTSIYONi= ====~========~=-= ===-==
1415 N. Rose Street Phone: (4 0) 949-0894
Tempe, Arizona 85281 Tsiyoni@Cox.Net
April 19, 20'19
Mr. T. Glenn Foster
Chief, Regulatory Review & Reinvention Branch
Standards & Rulemaking Division. US DOT,
Pipeline & Hazardous Material Saft.~ty Administration
1200 New Jersey Ave., SE, Washington DC 20590
Re: Ref No. 18-0156: FOLLOW UP and SUGGESTED CH NGES
Dear Mr. Foster:
Thank you Sir for taking the time to address rr,y concern, which helped to full foliow the laws
regarding the use or !ithiurn r ✓ atte : · i es in scoc-ter~:; fm handicap.
Sir, two smali issuc:·s, ac;::; rn~= idea me left Viet", anJ I wcuid aµpic dalc your quick help.
A. USING A SCOOTER ON THE GROUND I THE United 0 tates with lithium battery
which DID NOT went through U.N. 38.3 certifica te for batteries and/or cells:
It is my understanding that such is NOT AL.LOWE , me3ns the use of every scooter must
be with a lithium battery that has U.N. 38.8 certificates for both, battery and cells.
However, some don't think so.
8. I got confused about your last sentence in last par• graph in page one:
"The exception in§ 175.10 apply to shipment of hazardous materials by
aircraft only".
1. The exception f 175.10 means no limit to battery size while the battery is non-
spillable batteries and "Unless fully enclosed in a rigid housing". (175.10-a-15-V-B).
However, if the battery is removable, it must be taken to the cabin (with proper
notice) BUT MUST BE UNDER 300 WH (about 7.8 Ah) .
So, Sir, what did you mean by that sentence quoted in "8"?
B 1. The limitation that the battery must be "fully enclosed in a rigid hous ·ng" (175.1 O-a-
15-V-B): IS NOT PRACTICABLE: Only wheelchair have that, but for other scooters, it is
impossible for the manufacturer to seal the battery as required, because battery
must be available for removal by the user, when he or she needs to change, or
replace, or to remove before loading the scooter in a car trunk.
IN MY OPINION, dot SHOULD change the law to reflect that "or it must be well
secured on the scooter which it cannot be removed without special
tool used by the user~ and all electric connection ere removed
and outlets properly c vered" (so that n one else can remove, or it wont
be removed by mistake.
That way, it will be much easier for the person vith cfr ... ability to use the scooter without
carryiw· it to t~:e cabin.

<<<PAGE 4>>>

Page Two/ Mr. Foster
FOR ME SIR, IT IS IMPORTANT, and too complicated to carry to the cabin, as
otherwise! can check in the scooter like a luggage!!!
DOT has taken that from rne, AND I THINK IT IS NOT RIGHT. Every time I want to
check in the scooter, I must remove the battery and carry to the cabin.
I would like to ask for an exemption for me until and if the law is changed, of course
pending making it secured, and covering outlet , etc. lt is too difficult otherwise.
C. CHANGE OF LlM iTATl()N OF BATTERY 0. i .A.,RCRAFT frun 300 W H:
Due to power issue and usin9 l3rger motor, like 350 VV or even, in the future 400W:
The limitation of 300 W limits the bc:~ttery to 8 h which is too week and is 900d for short
range. At least the law should allow Hie use of battery up to 10 Ah and 36W , i.e.=
360WH instead ot · nder 300.
The last two issues will make a huge dtfferent in life o-f people with disability.
I would appreciate your direction and also con, ideration of the last two sugge tions. I think
the DOT was caught up with the issue of battery to be secured to the ccooter by the
manufacturer, which CAN ONLY BE APPLIED 01\! ELECTRIC WHEELCHAIR, AS THAT IS
TRADITIONALLY.
Thus, all other scooter with removable battery mak s the life of the person with disability
difficult.
I hope you can initiate changes and I hope I can be updated.
Thank you very much.

<<<PAGE 5>>>

U.S. Department
of Transportation
Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety
Administration
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
Washington, DC 20590
April 10, 2019
Mr. Joseph Tsiyoni
1415 North Rose Street
Tempe, AZ 85281
Reference No. 18-0156
- - ~c, .. ~, - - • ·- ~ - -----
.
Dear Mr. Tsiyoni:
This letter is in response to your December 6, 2018, phone conversations and emails requesting
clarification of the Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR; 49 CFR Parts 171-180) applicable
to United Nations (UN) testing oflithium ion batteries.
We have paraphrased and answered your questions as follows:
QI. You seek confirmation of your understanding that the criteria in Part III, Sub-section 38.3
of the UN Manual of Tests and Criteria, along ·with the provisions in§§ 173.185 and
175.10 of the HMR, are applicable to the transport of any lithium battery by any mode of
transport.
A 1. ..
Your understanding is correct. Shippers of lithium ion batteries or lithium metal batteries
must comply with the packaging instructions in § 173 .185 of the HMR, which states in
paragraph (a) that each lithium cell or battery must be of the type proven to meet the
criteria in Part III, Sub-section 38.3 of the UN Manual of Tests and Criteria. Section
173.185(a) further states that lithium cells and batteries are subject to these tests
regardless of whether the cells used to construct the battery are of a tested type. Section·
173.1(a)(2) states that P-attl73 of the HMR includes the requirements to be observed in
preparing hazardous materials for shipment by air, highway, rail, or water, or any
combination thereof. Therefore, the requirements of§ 173 .185-more specifically the .
requirement that all batteries be tested to meet the criteria in Part III, Sub-:-section 38.3 of
the UN Manual of Tests and Criteria-are applicable to all lithium batteries shipped by
. any mode of transportation.
Section 175.10 provides exceptions for passengers, crewmembers, and air operators
transporting lithium batteries aboard aircraft as part of a wheelchair or mobility aid.
These lithium batteries are excepted from the requirements of the HMR provided they
meet the criteria in Part III, Sub-section 38.3 of the UN Manual of Tests and Criteria,
unless approved by the Associate Administrator of Hazardous Materials Safety (See
§ 175.IO(a)(l 7)(i)). The exceptions in§ 175.10 apply to shipments of hazardous
materials by aircraft only.

<<<PAGE 6>>>

Q2. You ask whether lithium batteries may be used on the ground if they have not been tested
according to Part III, Sub-section 38.3 of the UN Manual of Tests and Criteria
A2. The HMR do not govern the use of lithium batteries. However, batteries that have not
been tested according to the UN Mru:1.ual of Tests and Criteria are generally not
acceptable for transport in th, e United States according to the HMR
.I hope this information is helpful. Please contact us if we can be of further assistance.
Sincerely,
.,,
-A/"/ ,ZS ::;----~
-r-y'~~U0--v~.
-- --:
T. Glenn Foster
Chief, Regulatory Review and Reinvention Branch
Standards and Rnlemaking Division
- **truncated:** false
- **body characters:** 10419
